Case law

Commonwealth v. Hobson

286 Pa. Super. 271 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1981

Commonwealth v. Minnick, supra; see Commonwealth v. … Brown, 261 Pa.Super. 240 , 396 A.2d 377 (1978); Commonwealth v. Irons, 254 Pa.Super. 251 , 385 A.2d 1004 (1978); Commonwealth v. Bostic, 251 Pa.Super. 224 , 380 A.2d 459 (1977); see generally Commonwealth v.

Hancock Bank v. Orlando

220 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 1971

Plaintiff, The Hancock Bank, through its Board of Directors at a regular meeting in March of 1967, approved a Line of Credit for Little Miss Tomatoes, Inc., to be secured by guarantee of certain principal shareholders. “2 … Johnston v. Patterson, 114 Pa. 398 , 6 A. 746 (1886); Donaldson v.

Commonwealth v. Nicholson

308 Pa. Super. 370 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1982

On February 2, 1978, three men armed with guns entered the B & D Variety Store at 51st and Brown Streets in Philadelphia and robbed eight persons of money, watches, wallets and other personal possessions. … Parker v. Randolph, 442 U.S. 62 , 75 n. 7, 99 S.Ct. 2132 , 2140 n. 7, 60 L.Ed.2d 713 (1979); Commonwealth v. Brown, 444 Pa. 318 , 282 A.2d 364 (1971). .

Com. v. Cassell, III, C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2024

Cassell urges this Court to follow the rationale of Commonwealth v. Brown, 798 WDA 2022, 2023 WL - 11 - J-A15023-24 3222860 (Pa. Super. … Brown, 2023 WL 3222860 at *2.

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

429 Pa. Super. 435 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1993

In support of this contention, the Commonwealth cites Common *438 wealth v. Tuladziecki, 513 Pa. 508 , 522 A.2d 17 (1987), Commonwealth v. Gambal, 522 Pa. 280 , 561 A.2d 710 (1989), and Commonwealth v. … The power of the court after a finding of violation of parole in cases not under the control of the State Board of Parole is “to recommit to jail____” See Commonwealth v.

In the Interest of: J.R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2024

On 7/30, GPS PO Brown contacted [Petitioner’s] grandmother in regard to these violations. GPS PO Brown stated to grandmother that [Petitioner] no longer has a curfew and is now house restricted. … See Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); Commonwealth. v. Johnson, 33 A.3d 122, 126 (Pa.

Phillips v. Selig

2008 Pa. Super. 244 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2008

As a result, at the June 30, 1999 meeting of the Board of Directors of the MLUA, Phillips and the MLUA board members discussed the possibility of taking a strike vote at the upcoming all-star break in July. … Glenn v.

Commonwealth v. Garaffa

440 Pa. Super. 484 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1995

Commonwealth v. John Wesley Brown, 538 Pa. 410 , 648 A.2d 1177 (1994), Commonwealth v. Thompson, 538 Pa. 297 , 648 A.2d 315 (1994). … The complainant in Commonwealth v.

McFeeley v. Brownsville School District

159 Pa. Super. 432 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1946

See also Good v. Pa. Dept. of Property & Supplies, 346 Pa. 151 , 30 A. 2d 434 ; Crispin v. Leedom and Worrall Co., 341 Pa. 325 , 19 A. 2d 400 ; Monahan v. Seeds & Durham, 336 Pa. 67 , 6 A. 2d 889 ; Parks v. … In Rathmell v.

Commonwealth v. Galletta

2004 Pa. Super. 463 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2004

The power of the court after a finding of violation of parole in cases not under the control of the State Board of Parole is “to recommit to jail....” See Commonwealth v. … See also Commonwealth v.

Dunbeker v. Duquesne Brew. Co. (Et Al.)

141 Pa. Super. 80 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1940

The referee made an award which was affirmed by the board; the court below entered judgment thereon and this appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier followed. … This case seems to us to be ruled by the opinion of our Supreme Court in McCarthy v. General Electric Co., 293 Pa. 448, 452 , 143 A. 116 , followed by us in Horn v. Fitler Co., 115 Pa.

Shawkey v. City of Pittsburgh

79 Pa. Super. 31 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1922

The assessment of benefits, for the expense and construction of the sewer, was conclusive, and from it the plaintiff had no right of appeal: Brackney v. Crafton Boro., 31 Pa. Superior Ct. 413 ; Murdoch v. … He has no right of action against the municipality therefor”: McDevitt v. Gas Co., 160 Pa. 374 .

Commonwealth v. Diamond

225 Pa. Super. 53 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 1973

To bolster this argument, the prosecution cites Commonwealth v. … In People v. Thiel, 29 App. Div. 913, 289 N.Y.S. 2d 879 (Sup.

Montgomery's Estate

63 Pa. Super. 318 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1916

In Brown’s Est., 208 Pa. 16 .1; Penn-Gaskell’s Est. (No. 1), 208 Pa. 342 ; and in Burkhart’s Est., 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 514 , both .the life estates and remainders were liable *323 for the tax and separately assessed. … This is of no aid in the interpretation of statutes: Com. v. Gilkeson, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 516 (522); Gyger’s Est., 65 Pa. 311 .

Kirby v. Kirby

455 Pa. Super. 96 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1997

French v. United Parcel Service, 377 Pa.Super. 366, 371 , 547 A.2d 411, 414 (1988). … As the trial court noted, Dudley v.

Ronan v. Eddy, Admr., (Et Al.)

136 Pa. Super. 436 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1939

The referee and the board granted compensation for total disability, and their action was sustained by the learned court below. These appeals were taken from the judgments entered on the awards. … In Blake v.

Graham v. Mt. Airy Building & Loan Ass'n

102 Pa. Super. 116 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1930

He parted with his title thereto entirely and thereby ceased to be a member of the association: Stoddard v. Thomas, 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 177 , and Stoddart v. Myers, 52 Pa. Superior Ct. 179 . … Assn. v. Shipley, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 232, 237 .

Com. v. Elvin, E.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2023

Commonwealth v. Mulkin, 228 A.3d 913, 917 (Pa. Super. 2020). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 249 A.3d 1206, 1216 (Pa. Super. 2021) (citation omitted). For the above reasons, we discern no abuse of the trial court’s sentencing discretion.

Russell v. Westmoreland County

26 Pa. Super. 425 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1904

One who, in a sudden emergency, acts according to his best judgment, or who, because" of want of time in which to form a judgment, fails to act in the most judicious manner, is not chargeable with negligence : Brown v. … In Rigony v.

Commonwealth v. McCutchen

274 Pa. Super. 96 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1979

In [Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.