Case law

Bonner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

156 Pa. Super. 367 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1944

The Board made the following findings of facts, which, being supported by the evidence, will be conclusive on us; §510 of the Unemployment Compensation Act; Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa. … The order of the Board of Review is reversed and the order of the Referee is sustained.

Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

164 Pa. Super. 36 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1948

Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case (Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review), 358 Pa. 224, 235 , 56 A. 2d 254 ; Barclay White Co. v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 356 Pa. 43, 48 , 50 A. 2d 336 ; Loerlein Unemployment Compensation Case (Duquesne Brewing Co. of Pittsburgh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) supra, 162 Pa.

MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

158 Pa. Super. 418 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1945

The board relies mainly upon Dept. of Labor and Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 148 Pa. … Bonner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 367 , 40 A. 2d 106 . A similar controversy will probably not again arise.

Guede v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Super. 479 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1948

The decision of the Board of Review will be sustained. The findings of the Board when supported by the evidence are conclusive on appeal to this Court. Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 160 Pa. … The decision of the Board of Review is based on the following finding of fact: “2.

Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

163 Pa. Super. 66 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

In a workmen’s compensation case, Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. … Carville v. Bornot & Co., 288 Pa. 104 , 135 A. 652 ; Wahs v. Wolf, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 181 , 42 A. 2d 166 .

Prentice v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

161 Pa. Super. 630 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1947

“The board’s findings of fact, when supported by evidence, are conclusive upon appeal, which is confined to questions of law”: MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board, 158 Pa. … As said in Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board, 356 Pa. 43, 50 , 50 A. 2d 336 : “By what stretch of the imagination could it be said that such a person is involuntarily unemployed?

Hoffstot v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

164 Pa. Super. 43 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1948

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review), 158 Pa. … For example, in Pusey Unemployment Compensation Case (Department of Labor and Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review), 159 Pa.

Hassey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Super. 14 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1947

L. 1145, §9, 43 PS §802. *16 , The board after taking additional testimony, affirmed the findings of fact of the referee. … But consideration of this and of other factors is for the board; and determination of suitability of work is largely a question of fact and ordinarily our review is limited to ascertaining whether the board’s findings are

Bily v. Board of Property Assessment

157 Pa. Super. 252 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1945

Neubert v. Armstrong Water Co., 26 Pa. Superior Ct. 608 . Jurisdiction of the appeal is therefore in the Supreme Court. Ribblet v. Westrick, 341 Pa. 484 , 19 A. 2d 394 . … After appellant’s standing has been established, and the board has acted upon the assessment, an appeal might lie to this Court, depending upon the amount of money then in controversy.

Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

164 Pa. Super. 9 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1948

L. 1019, § 51, 46 PS § 551; Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 356 Pa. 43, 48 , 50 A. 2d 336 . … Baigis Unemployment Compensation Case (Cien Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review), 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 379, 383 , 51 A. 2d 518 .

Kovacs v. Ross Township Board of Adjustment

173 Pa. Super. 66 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1953

Exley et al., 358 Pa. 555, 558 , 57 A. 2d 878 ; Floersheim Appeal, 348 Pa. 98, 100 , 34 A. 2d 62 ), or where the Board’s action discloses a “manifest and flagrant abuse of discretion” (Perelman et al. v. … There is, however, the case of Vogt v. Port Vue Borough, 170 Pa.

Turner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

163 Pa. Super. 168 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

See Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256, 260 , 198 A. 154 ; Tuttle Unemployment Compensation Case, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 46 , 49 A. 2d 847 ; Commonwealth v. Schneiderman, 162 Pa. Superior Ct. 461 , 58 A. 2d 196 ; Pittsburgh v. … A claimant’s illness (Marcus v. Cohen, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 383 ), or the neglect of an attorney (Wise v.

Haug v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1947

The board of review *3 concluded: “Inasmuch as the claimant had been unemployed approximately ten months at the time the work was offered to her, it is the opinion of this Board that she had been given ample opportunity to … Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 356 Pa. 43, 48 , 50 A. 2d 336 .

Jones v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

163 Pa. Super. 271 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

Palumbo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 289, 292 , 25 A. 2d 80; MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 158 Pa. … MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 418, 422 , 45 A. 2d 423 . Decision is affirmed.

Kassarich v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

139 Pa. Super. 599 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1940

him that his experience as set forth in his application did not meet the minimum requirements prescribed by the Secretary of Labor and Industry, as the new board construed them; and after a hearing, the board notified the … Any errors in; the selection of the list of eligibles, not arising from fraud, misrepresentation or misconduct, is cured by the appointment, and neither the Board, which certified him, nor a subsequent Board, *605 is given

Morgan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

174 Pa. Super. 59 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

The Board affirmed the referee in his decision that claimant was ineligible for benefits under the act, but on grounds that his unemployment was due to discharge for willful misconduct connected with his work, under the provisions … Viewed in the light of the Board’s final order, this evidence is significant and should have been admitted.

Gollier v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Super. 136 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1947

Why a new claim was filed under a new number and Without *139 any reference to the prior decision does not appear from the record, but claimant was not represented by counsel and, as stated by this court in Layton v. … Unemployment Compensation Board, 156 Pa.

Seroskie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

169 Pa. Super. 470 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

Opinion by Gunther, J., This is an unemployment compensation case in which the bureau, the referee and the Unemployment *471 Compensation Board of Review disallowed compensation on tlie ground that the claimant voluntarily … The Board found -as - a fact: “4. Claimant abandonéd his employunent- because he .wanted to retain Joe-Kramlick: as a laborer.

Thurston v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

140 Pa. Super. 254 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1940

See Kassarich v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 599 , 12 A. 2d 823 ; Gangewer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 137 Pa. … The testimony of the appellant on the hearing before the board fully supports its order or decision. Affirmed.

Force v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

143 Pa. Super. 20 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1940

See Thurston v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 254 , 13 A. 2d 890 ; Morrison v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 256 , 15 A. 2d 391 . … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; Cangewer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 453 , 9 A. 2d 490 . The appeal is dismissed.