Case law

Commonwealth v. Galadyna

248 Pa. Super. 226 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1977

See Terry v. Ohio, supra. … Brown, 232 Pa.Super. 463 , 335 A.2d 782 (1975); Commonwealth v. Nastari, 232 Pa.Super. 405, 335 A.2d 468 (1975). 3 . Appellees argue that they were “seized” when the police officers parked their car. We disagree.

Donaldson v. Fortna

76 Pa. Super. 403 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1921

In Insurance Company v. Vitale, 10 Pa. … In Buehler v.

Commonwealth v. Dickinson

62 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1916

The court, under authority of Commonwealth v. Shaffer, 52 Pa. … This was followed in Allen v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Shroad v. Smith

180 Pa. Super. 445 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1956

Harry v. Eastridge, 374 Pa. 172, 177 , 97 A. 2d 350 (1953). … Shamenek v. Allen, 179 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Ryan

306 Pa. Super. 159 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1983

He would testify also that there is one case currently on my board and that comes before this case and that as soon as I try the, I believe, it is the Haley and Mitchell, I would be available to try Mr. … Your Honor, we would consent, if Your Honor is so disposed to have this case ordered to be tried immediately following the one I have on the board now.” (N.T. Sept. 11, 1980, pp. 8, 9, 22).

Kotovsky v. Ski Liberty Operating Corp.

412 Pa. Super. 442 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1992

Groff v. Pete Kingsley, 374 Pa.Super. 377 , 543 A.2d 128 (1988); Vogel v. Berkley, 354 Pa.Super. 291 , 511 *446 A.2d 878, 880 (1986), citing Dudash v. … The fact that the release specifically referred to and included possible liability for acts of negligence distinguishes the release in this case from that in Brown v.

Mattern v. Decker

59 Pa. Super. 186 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1915

In Bauschard Co. v. Fidelity, etc., Co., 21 Pa. Superior Ct. 370 , this court, speaking by Judge W. W. … There were no superior officers and there was no board of directors to supervise his work.

Commonwealth v. Phelps

220 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1971

Brown v. Rundle, 417 F. 2d 282 (3rd Cir. 1969); Verdugo v. United States, 402 F. 2d 599 (9th Cir. 1968); Baker v. United States, 388 F. 2d 931 (4th Cir. 1968) ; State v. … State v. Kunz, 55 N.J. 138 , 259 A. 2d at 900 .

Commonwealth v. Wilson

2003 Pa. Super. 205 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2003

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 438 , 648 *714 A.2d 1177, 1191 (1994). Such a claim is more properly characterized as a weight of the evidence challenge. Commonwealth v.

Schlott v. Stefanosicz

167 Pa. Super. 164 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

Dez elan v. Duquesne Light Co., 334 Pa. 246 , 5 A. 2d 552 ; Szanborsky v. Armour & Co., 306 Pa. 525 , 160 A. 219 ; Valente v. Lindner, 340 Pa. 508 , 17 A. 2d 371 . … Cf. also, Hunter v. Pope, 289 Pa. 560 , 137 A. 731 ; Tan Winckler v. Morris (No. 1), 46 Pa. Superior Ct. 142 .

Mancine v. CONCORD-LIB. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N

299 Pa. Super. 260 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1982

Bowen, 6 Watts & S. 504 (1843); Springer v. Brown, 9 Pa. 305 (1848); Wilson v. McCullough, 19 Pa. 77 (1852); Evans v. Meylert, 19 Pa. 402 (1852); Gibson v. Winslow, 38 Pa. 49 (1861); Kinter v. … wrongfully sold by appellee at sheriff's sale; for damages she incurred because she had to vacate her home; for causing her to give up her belongings and furnishings; for loss of income by way of having to pay room and board

Myers v. Myers

16 Pa. Super. 511 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1901

Shortly after the North Market street building was remodeled the decedent caused to be erected across the lot a substantial board fence, and the lot used in connection with the building fronting on North Queen street, testator … Superior Ct. 305 ; Willard’s Estate, 68 Pa. 327 ; Best v. Hammond, 55 Pa. 410 ; Wursthoff v. Dracourt, 3 Watts, 243 ; Asay v. Hoover, 5 Pa. 21 ; Root’s Estate, 187 Pa. 118 .

Weitzel v. Traders' National Bank

18 Pa. Super. 615 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1902

required to give bond conditioned for the faithful accounting for and payment of all moneys, property and funds of every description that might come into his hands “ by virtue of his office as teller,” to the order of the board … Bank v. Bache, 71 Pa. 213 ; Farmers’, etc., Nat. Bank v. King, 57 Pa. 202 .

Nasdaq Omx Phlx, Inc. v. Pennmont Securities

2012 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2012

In Dooner v. … Corp. v.

Gilbert v. Stipa

157 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1944

Dennis v. Munyan, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 310, 312 , 11 A. 2d 566 . … Hutchinson v. Follmer Trucking Co., 333 Pa. 424, 428 , 5 A. 2d 182 ; Weibel v. Ferguson, 342 Pa. 113 , 19 A. 2d 357 . Judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Smith v. Sandt

694 A.2d 1099 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1997

Titusville Trust Co. v. Johnson, 375 Pa. 493, 499 , 100 A.2d 93, 97 (1953). The facts of the instant case support a finding of a gift causa mortis. … Titusville Trust Co. v. Johnson, at 497-498, 100 A.2d at 96 . See, In re Brown’s Estate, 489 Pa. 199 , 413 A.2d 1083 (1980).

Heinrich v. Conemaugh Valley Memorial Hospital

436 Pa. Super. 465 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 1994

Appellants cite to Brown v. … See also Thomas v.

Com. v. Disco, R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2025

See Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. … Commonwealth v. Burton, 121 A.3d 1063, 1071 (Pa. Super. 2015) (en banc); see also Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Smith v. Smith

260 Pa. Super. 203 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1978

In Leedom v. … Hawkins, 416 Pa. 180 , 205 A.2d 429 (1964); Brodt v. Brown, 404 Pa. 391 , 172 A.2d 152 (1961). The question of laches is factual and is determined by examining the circumstances of each case. Siegel v.

In re Street

10 Pa. Super. 332 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 1899

Porter, That which is now called Cresson street between Shur’s lane and Cedar street was put on the plan of the city of Philadelphia by the approval of the board of surveyors and confirmation of the court of quarter sessions … Such plotting does not acquire for the public any right of use for travel: Commonwealth v. The Railroad, 135 Pa. 256, 271 .