Case law

Brown v. Sunbury & Selinsgrove Electric Street Railway Co.

43 Pa. Super. 61 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1910

They testified that she had boarded the car in company with a man, not her husband, who paid her fare, sat in the seat and conversed with her and tried to persuade her to continue her journey. … An examination of the recent cases of Holden v. Penna. R. R. Co., 169 Pa. 1 ; Saxton v. Pittsburg Rys. Co., 219 Pa. 492 ; Freeman v. Traction Co., 36 Pa.

George, P. v. George, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2016

Regions Mortgage, Inc. v. Muthler, 889 A.2d 39 (Pa. 2005). … Nebesho v. Brown, 846 A.2d 721, 725 (Pa. Super. 2004). -4- J-A23006-16 mistake).

Limestone Products & Supply Co. v. Tom Brown, Inc.

198 Pa. Super. 375 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1962

National Bedding Co., 276 Pa. 467, 471 , 120 A. 471 ; Smithers v. Light, 305 Pa. 141, 145 , 157 A. 489 ; Com. v. Prezioso, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 80, 85 , 41 A. 2d 350 ; Kobierowski v. … This invoice No. 1980 was made out to Tom Brown, Inc., the defendant, and it clearly showed that the concrete had been delivered to “Mall Bros. Job, Santa Fe Dr. Bethel.”

Shumake v. Philadelphia Board of Education

454 Pa. Super. 556 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1996

Scranton Fed’n of Teachers v. Scranton Sch. Dist., 498 Pa. 58, 65 , 444 A.2d 1144, 1147 (1982). … Cohen v. Temple Univ., 299 Pa.Super. 124 , 445 A.2d 179 (1982).

Brown v. Home Insurance

119 Pa. Super. 105 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1935

Brown brought an action of assumpsit in the County Court of Allegheny County, against The Home Insurance Company, New York, to recover the sum of one thousand dollars with interest from August 9, 1933, upon a policy of fire … To same effect, Beck v. Ins. Co., 163 Pa. 443 , 30 A. 205 ; Frick v. Ins. Co., 218 Pa. 409 , 67 A. 743 ; Mellon v. Ins. Co., 40 Pa. Superior Ct. 623 .

Commonwealth v. Ligon

206 A.3d 1196 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2019

Commonwealth v. Brown, 159 A.3d 531, 532 (Pa.Super. 2017) (citation omitted). … Appellant relies on Songster v.

Brown, B. v. Brown, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2023

BROWN : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. … Biese v. Biese, 979 A.2d 892, 895 (Pa. Super. 2009).

MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

158 Pa. Super. 418 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1945

The board relies mainly upon Dept. of Labor and Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 148 Pa. … Bonner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 367 , 40 A. 2d 106 . A similar controversy will probably not again arise.

Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

163 Pa. Super. 66 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

In a workmen’s compensation case, Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. … Carville v. Bornot & Co., 288 Pa. 104 , 135 A. 652 ; Wahs v. Wolf, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 181 , 42 A. 2d 166 .

Turner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

163 Pa. Super. 168 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

See Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256, 260 , 198 A. 154 ; Tuttle Unemployment Compensation Case, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 46 , 49 A. 2d 847 ; Commonwealth v. Schneiderman, 162 Pa. Superior Ct. 461 , 58 A. 2d 196 ; Pittsburgh v. … A claimant’s illness (Marcus v. Cohen, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 383 ), or the neglect of an attorney (Wise v.

Morris Box Board Co. v. Rossiter

30 Pa. Super. 23 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1906

The latter is a general law and applies to foreign attachment: Hamberger v. Marcus, 157 Pa. 133 ; Little v. Balliette, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 411 . It was under consideration in Firmstone v. … In a still later case Justice McCollum, citing Firmstone v. Mack, said that the exemption of the wages of labor was intended for the benefit of the debtor and his family and he cannot waive it: Steel v.

Jones v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

163 Pa. Super. 271 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

Palumbo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 289, 292 , 25 A. 2d 80; MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 158 Pa. … MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 418, 422 , 45 A. 2d 423 . Decision is affirmed.

Kassarich v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

139 Pa. Super. 599 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1940

him that his experience as set forth in his application did not meet the minimum requirements prescribed by the Secretary of Labor and Industry, as the new board construed them; and after a hearing, the board notified the … Any errors in; the selection of the list of eligibles, not arising from fraud, misrepresentation or misconduct, is cured by the appointment, and neither the Board, which certified him, nor a subsequent Board, *605 is given

Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.

233 Pa. Super. 518 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1975

(See e.g.: Holmes v. Broodno, 222 Pa. … See Beth-Allen Sales Co. v. Hartford Insurance Group, 217 Pa.

Morgan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

174 Pa. Super. 59 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

The Board affirmed the referee in his decision that claimant was ineligible for benefits under the act, but on grounds that his unemployment was due to discharge for willful misconduct connected with his work, under the provisions … Viewed in the light of the Board’s final order, this evidence is significant and should have been admitted.

Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

178 Pa. Super. 400 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

Ristis, the claimant herein, was declared eligible for unemployment compensation benefits by the bureau, the referee and the board. … “The credibility of the witnesses, the weight of .their testimony, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from it are for the board.

Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

152 Pa. Super. 315 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1943

The findings of fact of the Board are supported by the evidence and under the Act are conclusive on us: Sec. 510; Gallagher v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 148 Pa. … Superior Ct. 228 , 24 A. 2d 627 ; Dept. of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 249 , 24 A. 2d 924 . The conclusions and order of the Board are sustained by the findings.

Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

160 Pa. Super. 65 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1946

Per Curiam, The board adopted the referee’s findings of fact which established that claimant-appellant, with a service rating of thirty-four years as an employe of the Bell Telephone Company, elected to be, and was, retired

Gallagher v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

148 Pa. Super. 228 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1941

See Thurston v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 254 , 13 A. 2d 890 ; Force v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 20 , 18 A. 2d 81 . … Prindible, was not the action of the board. See Pike County v. Rowland, 94 Pa. 288 ; Somerset Twp. v. Parson, 105 Pa. 360, 361; Nason v. Poor Directors, 126 Pa. 445, 458-9 , 17 A. 616 ; Mundy Paving & Const. Co. v.

Perelman v. Yeadon Borough Board of Adjustment

144 Pa. Super. 5 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1940

See Liggett’s Petition, 291 Pa. 109 , 139 A. 619 ; Valicenti’s Appeal, 298 Pa. 276 , 148 A. 308 ; and Fleming *11 v. Prospect Park Board of Adjustment, 318 Pa. 582 , 178 A. 813 . … In Todd et al v.