Case law

Castle Roofing & Const. LLC v. Elize, C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 2020

Board of Supervisors of Willistown Township v. Main Line Gardens, Inc., 155 A.3d 39, 45 (Pa. 2017). … Brown v. Halpern, 202 A.3d 687, 703 (Pa. Super. 2019); Corvin v. Tihansky, 184 A.3d 986, 992 (Pa. Super. 2018).

Commonwealth v. Butt

406 Pa. Super. 526 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1991

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 166-167 n. 6, 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 2226 n. 6, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … In Ashe v.

Commonwealth v. King

247 Pa. Super. 443 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1977

In Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Zasloff

137 Pa. Super. 96 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1939

Milk Control Board, 322 Pa. 257 , 186 A. 336 . And periods of economic depression particularly are fertile times for the growth of trade practices which affect the well-being of the community. … Nebbia v. New York, 291 U. S. 502 , 54 S. Ct. 505 ; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 23 F. supp. 890.

Roberts v. Gibson

214 Pa. Super. 220 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1969

McLanahan v. Goodman, 265 Pa. 43, 49 , 108 A. 206, 208 (1919). In Mencke v. … See Smith v. Smith, 40 Cal. 2d 461 , 254 P. 2d 1 (1953); Brown v. Superior Court, 242 Cal. App. 2d 519 , 51 Cal. Rptr. 633 (1966); Linville v. Chenoweth, 119 Ind. App. 515 , 84 N.E. 2d 473 (1949) ; Brumbaugh v.

Seltzer v. Reading

151 Pa. Super. 226 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1942

Com. v. Bacon, 6 S. & R. 322; Koontz v. Franklin County, 76 Pa. 154 . … In Steiner v.

Mertis, B. v. Dong-Joon, M.D.

289 A.3d 532 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2022

See Marek v. Ketyer, 733 A.2d 1268, 1270 (Pa. Super. 1999), appeal denied, 749 A.2d 471 (Pa. 2000). … See Brown v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Labs., Inc., 209 A.3d 386, 389 (Pa. Super. 2019). 3We interpret our Rules of Civil Procedure in conformity with rules of grammar and according to their common and approved usage.

Citizens National Bk. Greencastle v. Speck

108 Pa. Super. 247 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1932

Co. v. Gill, 285 Pa. 305 , 132 Atl. 368 ; Herring v. Weinroth, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 529, 531 . So considering the evidence, we will state the material facts. … See Wiley v. Moor, 17 S. & E. 438, 439; Worrall v. Gheen, 39 Pa. 388, 396 ; Simpson v. Bovard, 74 Pa. 351, 361 ; Hepler v. Savings Bank, 97 Pa. 420 ; Wessell v. Glenn, 108 Pa. 104, 111 ; Howie v. Lewis, 14 Pa.

Commonwealth v. A.R.

2010 Pa. Super. 4 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 2010

The Board determined [that] he was not [a sexually violent predator], [...]. … Commonwealth v.

Sinkiewicz v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

115 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1934

We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the referee or board to whom is delegated the exclusive function of determining facts: Morris v. Yough C. & S. Co., 266 Pa. 216, 219 , 109 A. 914 ; Todd v. Lehigh V. C. … Cornish, 295 Pa. 73 ; Matis v. Schaeffer, 270 Pa. 141 ; Lane v. Horn and Hardart Baking Co., 261 Pa, 329.”

Horning's Case

26 Pa. Super. 282 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1904

v. … It was declared in Bell v.

Commonwealth v. Cunningham

275 Pa. Super. 46 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1980

See Commonwealth v. … . § 6106 (1974), pursuant to In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970) and Commonwealth v. McNeil, 461 Pa. 709 , 337 A.2d 840 (1975).

Claremont Advisors v. Sage Scholars

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2021

Brown v. Cooke, 707 A.2d 231, 233 (Pa. Super. 1998) (quotation and citations omitted). Ford Motor Co. v. Buseman, 954 A.2d 580, 582-83 (Pa. Super. 2008). … Harrity v. Med. College of Pa. Hosp., 653 A.2d 5, 10 (Pa. Super. 1994).

Palladinetti v. Penn Distributors, Inc.

695 A.2d 855 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1997

Dent-Tal-Ez, Inc. v. Siemens Capital Corporartion, 389 Pa.Super. 219 , 566 A.2d 1214 (1989). Tony Savatt Inc. v. … Chmura v. Deegan, 398 Pa.Super. 532, 535 , 581 A.2d 592, 593 (1990). See Valley Forge Historical Society v. Washington Memorial Chapel, 493 Pa. 491 , 426 A.2d 1123 (1981). All-Pak, Inc. v.

Tosi v. Kizis

2014 Pa. Super. 16 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2014

(quoting Paden v. Baker Concrete Constr., 540 Pa. 409 , 658 A.2d 341, 343 (1995)). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, therefore our standard of review is de novo, and our scope of review is plenary. Brown v. … Yelenic v. Clark, 922 A.2d 935, 938 (Pa.Super.2007).

Commonwealth v. Scott

38 Pa. Super. 303 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1909

Opinion by Henderson, J., This case was argued with Commonwealth v. John Havrilla, ante, p. 292, and arises out of a similar state of facts. The decision in the latter case disposes of the first assignment in this case. … The fifth assignment relates to the refusal of the court to admit in evidence a copy of the election law sent by the county commissioners to the election board of which the defendant was judge, in which copy it was stated

Vuyovich v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

98 Pa. Super. 501 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1929

He wrote the claimant’s name on the board and evidently that was notice that *504 he was recognized as an employe. There being competent evidence to sustain the finding, we must accept it as true: Slemba v. … It is not in our province to disturb findings: McAdams v. Pearson & Ludascher, 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 152 . Section 203 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P.

Commonwealth v. Straus

32 Pa. Super. 389 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1907

The propriety of granting the writ is within the sound discretion of the court and it may be allowed at the instance of a private relator: Gilroy v. Com., 105 Pa. 484 ; Com. v. Stevens, 168 Pa. 582 . … The case is not inconsistent with Jenkins v. Baxter, 160 Pa. 199 ; O’Shea v. Flannery, 10 Pa. Dist. Reps. 356, and many other cases in which the function of the writ of quo warranto is explained.

Ketzel v. Hammermill Paper Co.

159 Pa. Super. 462 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1946

Opinion by Reno, J., The claimant appealed from the judgment of the court below, which affirmed the referee and Workmen’s Compensation Board, holding that his petition to set aside a final compensation receipt was filed too … See also Com. v. Duffy, 96 Pa. 506 ; Gault’s App., 33 Pa. 94 ; Waters v. Bates, 44 Pa. 473 ; Clay v. Iseminger, 187 Pa. 108 , [ 41 A. 38 ]; Kille v. Reading Iron Works, 134 Pa. 225, 227 , [ 19 A. 547 ]; Lane v.

Gartland v. Rosenthal

2004 Pa. Super. 134 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2004

See Eaddy v. Hamaty, 694 A.2d 639, 642 (Pa.Super.1997). … , be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, except as provided in subsection (e) [allowing waiver of subsection (c)’s requirements if expert is trained in diagnosis or treatment of condition, as applicable