Case law

Commonwealth v. A.R.

2010 Pa. Super. 4 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 2010

The Board determined [that] he was not [a sexually violent predator], [...]. … Commonwealth v.

Sinkiewicz v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

115 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1934

We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the referee or board to whom is delegated the exclusive function of determining facts: Morris v. Yough C. & S. Co., 266 Pa. 216, 219 , 109 A. 914 ; Todd v. Lehigh V. C. … Cornish, 295 Pa. 73 ; Matis v. Schaeffer, 270 Pa. 141 ; Lane v. Horn and Hardart Baking Co., 261 Pa, 329.”

Ketzel v. Hammermill Paper Co.

159 Pa. Super. 462 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1946

Opinion by Reno, J., The claimant appealed from the judgment of the court below, which affirmed the referee and Workmen’s Compensation Board, holding that his petition to set aside a final compensation receipt was filed too … See also Com. v. Duffy, 96 Pa. 506 ; Gault’s App., 33 Pa. 94 ; Waters v. Bates, 44 Pa. 473 ; Clay v. Iseminger, 187 Pa. 108 , [ 41 A. 38 ]; Kille v. Reading Iron Works, 134 Pa. 225, 227 , [ 19 A. 547 ]; Lane v.

Mertis, B. v. Dong-Joon, M.D.

289 A.3d 532 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2022

See Marek v. Ketyer, 733 A.2d 1268, 1270 (Pa. Super. 1999), appeal denied, 749 A.2d 471 (Pa. 2000). … See Brown v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Labs., Inc., 209 A.3d 386, 389 (Pa. Super. 2019). 3We interpret our Rules of Civil Procedure in conformity with rules of grammar and according to their common and approved usage.

Commonwealth v. Cunningham

275 Pa. Super. 46 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1980

See Commonwealth v. … . § 6106 (1974), pursuant to In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970) and Commonwealth v. McNeil, 461 Pa. 709 , 337 A.2d 840 (1975).

Claremont Advisors v. Sage Scholars

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2021

Brown v. Cooke, 707 A.2d 231, 233 (Pa. Super. 1998) (quotation and citations omitted). Ford Motor Co. v. Buseman, 954 A.2d 580, 582-83 (Pa. Super. 2008). … Harrity v. Med. College of Pa. Hosp., 653 A.2d 5, 10 (Pa. Super. 1994).

Hammerman v. Lee

207 Pa. Super. 370 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1966

The action was submitted to a board of arbitrators in accordance with rules of the County Court of Philadelphia adopted pursuant to the Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 715, as amended, 5 P.S. §21 et seq. … The appellant urges that this case is controlled' by Klugman v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 268 , 182 A. 2d 223 (1962).

Commonwealth v. Scott

38 Pa. Super. 303 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1909

Opinion by Henderson, J., This case was argued with Commonwealth v. John Havrilla, ante, p. 292, and arises out of a similar state of facts. The decision in the latter case disposes of the first assignment in this case. … The fifth assignment relates to the refusal of the court to admit in evidence a copy of the election law sent by the county commissioners to the election board of which the defendant was judge, in which copy it was stated

Palladinetti v. Penn Distributors, Inc.

695 A.2d 855 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1997

Dent-Tal-Ez, Inc. v. Siemens Capital Corporartion, 389 Pa.Super. 219 , 566 A.2d 1214 (1989). Tony Savatt Inc. v. … Chmura v. Deegan, 398 Pa.Super. 532, 535 , 581 A.2d 592, 593 (1990). See Valley Forge Historical Society v. Washington Memorial Chapel, 493 Pa. 491 , 426 A.2d 1123 (1981). All-Pak, Inc. v.

Vuyovich v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

98 Pa. Super. 501 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1929

He wrote the claimant’s name on the board and evidently that was notice that *504 he was recognized as an employe. There being competent evidence to sustain the finding, we must accept it as true: Slemba v. … It is not in our province to disturb findings: McAdams v. Pearson & Ludascher, 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 152 . Section 203 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P.

Commonwealth v. Straus

32 Pa. Super. 389 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1907

The propriety of granting the writ is within the sound discretion of the court and it may be allowed at the instance of a private relator: Gilroy v. Com., 105 Pa. 484 ; Com. v. Stevens, 168 Pa. 582 . … The case is not inconsistent with Jenkins v. Baxter, 160 Pa. 199 ; O’Shea v. Flannery, 10 Pa. Dist. Reps. 356, and many other cases in which the function of the writ of quo warranto is explained.

Commonwealth v. Seskey

170 A.3d 1105 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2017

Commonwealth v. Brown, 159 A.3d 531, 532 (Pa. Super. 2017) (citation omitted). … Id. at 1284, citing Commonwealth v. Hertzog, 425 A.2d 329, 333 (Pa. 1981); see also Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Lites, B.

2020 Pa. Super. 152 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 2020

Brown, Esq., who filed a motion for reconsideration challenging the legality of Appellant’s sentence. … Subsequently, on February 4, 2019, Attorney Brown entered his appearance, and then he filed the motion for panel reconsideration raising the sole legality-of-sentence claim. See Commonwealth v.

Gartland v. Rosenthal

2004 Pa. Super. 134 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2004

See Eaddy v. Hamaty, 694 A.2d 639, 642 (Pa.Super.1997). … , be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, except as provided in subsection (e) [allowing waiver of subsection (c)’s requirements if expert is trained in diagnosis or treatment of condition, as applicable

Com. v. Banks, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2015

Brown in the room, Officer Jones approached [Appellant] who was seated on the bed to show him a picture of Ms. Brown for identification. … United States v. Robinson, 978 F.2d 1554, 1557–1558 (10th Cir. 1992) (internal quotations and citations omitted); see also Rivas v.

Scharfman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

234 Pa. Super. 563 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1975

Washington Mall v. Board for the Assessment and Revision of Taxes, 4 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 251, 253-254 , 285 A. 2d 885 (1971). See also Luckenbach v. Luckenbach, 443 Pa. 417 , 281 A. 2d 169 (1971); Kravitz v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 415 Pa. 97 , 202 A. 2d 64 (1964); Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256 , 198 A. 154 (1938). .

Mitchell v. Pittsburgh

233 Pa. Super. 119 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1975

Act of June 16, 1836, supra, as amended, §27 (V), 5 P.S. §71 (V). This right to a jury trial de novo is mandated by the Pennsylvania Constitution, Art. I,- sec. 6. … “It has long been the law in this Commonwealth that where a board of arbitrators finds two or more defendants jointly liable, an appeal from the arbitrators’ award taken by only one defendant will not be considered an appeal

Baldwin v. Ely

127 Pa. Super. 110 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1937

Under the common law, however, the release of one was a release of all, and this rule was followed in our earlier cases (Milliken v. Brown, 1 Rawle 391 ; Burson v. … Such an agreement is construed as a covenant not to sue or as a qualified release: Burke et al. v. Noble, 48 Pa. 168 ; Greenwald & Co. v. Kaster, 86 Pa. 45 ; Bryant v.

McKeown's Petition

51 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1912

The case of Provident Life & Trust Co. v. Hammond, 230 Pa. 407 , involved a wholly misleading title. It purported to be an amendment of sec. 21 of an act approved June 27,1879, P. … Smith Woolen Machinery Co. v. Browne, 206 Pa. 543 , is a comparatively recent case on this subject. To the same effect is Greenfield Ave., 191 Pa. 290 . Cornman v. Hagginbotham, 227 Pa. 549 , is another case.

Snyder v. Hershey Chocolate Co.

63 Pa. Super. 528 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1916

In the.case of Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Company, 150 Wis. 517 , 137 N. W. 769 , 44 L. R. … As in Kane v.