Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.78s
141 Pa. Super. 329 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1940
That exception, exemplified by Folkman v. Lauer, 244 Pa. 605 , and Kane v. Lauer, 52 Pa. … The cases of Folkman v. Lauer, supra, and Kane v. Lauer, supra, *338 have been cited as authority for appellant’s liability under that exception.
Cited 5 timesPublished68 Pa. Super. 160 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1917
The distinction between the laying out and the opening of a borough or city street has been long recognized: Forbes Street, 70 Pa. 125 ; Whittaker v. Phoenixville Borough, 141 Pa. 327 . … Justice Brown in Scranton Sewer, 213 Pa.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFeldman v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund
2005 Pa. Super. 41 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2005
Pennsylvania State University v. … Hall v. Brown, 363 Pa.Super. 415 , 526 A.2d 413, 416 (1987).
Cited 5 timesPublishedBlair v. Kingston Manufacturing Co.
64 Pa. Super. 506 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1916
Co., incorporated under the Act of 1874, erected a plant and carried on its operation until August, 1912, when its board of directors, Straw, Welles, Smith, Newberry and Buggies, authorized by mere verbal lease an arrangement … The same situation arose in Patterson v. Wyomissing Mfg. Co., supra, and Mansfield Iron Works v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedTelech v. Orthodox Catholic Mutual Aid Society of America
63 Pa. Super. 207 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1916
In case of the death of a member or his wife (or husband), the brotherhood shall immediately inform the board of directors and present according to established form, (a) a sworn doctor’s certificate as to the cause of death … It is evident that the court below could not have granted the appellant’s request for binding instructions nor have entered judgment n. o. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Central Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
193 Pa. Super. 636 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960
Bridgewater Boro. v. Pa. P. U. C., 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 84, 99 , 124 A. 2d 165 (1956). … Railroad Co. v. Pa. P. U. C., 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 228 , 132 A. 2d 887 (1957); Reading Company v. Pa. P. U. C., 191 Pa. Superior Ct. 635 , 159 A. 2d 61 (1960).
Cited 1 timesPublished297 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1982
See: Quaker Transit Company, Inc. v. Jack W. … See: Johnson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished50 Pa. Super. 551 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1912
. *556 The plaintiff’s learned counsel relies on the following authorities as to the sufficiency of the notice under the eighth section of the act of 1901: Este v. Penna. R. R. Co., 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 521 ; Willson v. … Canevin, 226 Pa. 362 ; Thirsk v. Evans, 211 Pa. 239 , and Day v. Penna. R. R. Co., 224 Pa. 193 , but we do not think these cases sustain their contention. McVey v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilson v. Public Service Commission
103 Pa. Super. 558 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1931
City Club of Phila. v. Pub. Ser. Com., 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 219 . The evidence received by the commission, as printed on this appeal, covers approximately four hundred pages and includes a number of exhibits. … The director of city transit testified that the tabulations had been prepared and checked by the Department of City Transit from reports of the Broad Street Subway Conference Board.
Cited 1 timesPublished185 Pa. Super. 269 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958
She described the defendant as follows: “. . . he had on a blue and white plain shirt, stripes, plain like, and a brown pair of army pants, and his hair fixed exactly as it is now.” … It was perfectly proper to permit the victim to explain why she had told the magistrate that the appellant was not the robber: Com. v. Del Vaecio, 299 Pa. 547, 553 , 149 A. 696 ; Com. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedGierak v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.
101 Pa. Super. 397 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1931
This agreement was approved by the Workmen’s Compensation Board on August 6, 1928. … See Murrell v. In *401 dustrial Commission (Ill.), 126 N. E. 189 ; Bell v. Terry and Tench Co., 163 N. Y. 733 ; 177 App. Div. 123 .
Questioned by Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 20 Pa. Commw. 330 (1975)Cited 6 timesPublished29 Pa. Super. 205 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1905
Young had no control over the attachment proceeding, was not heard, and could not be legally affected thereby : Ruff v. Ruff, 85 Pa. 833 . … Young on the note: Brown v. Scott, 51 Pa. 357 . The trial in that proceeding came to naught; the case was abandoned, and on no theory can it be held that the attempt of the plaintiffs there to show that D. H.
Cited 0 timesPublished256 Pa. Super. 128 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1978
Commonwealth v. Lopinson, 427 Pa. 284 , 234 A.2d 552 (1967); Commonwealth v. Rainey, 242 Pa.Super. 39 , 363 A.2d 1148 (1976). … Compare Commonwealth v. Brown, 464 Pa. 625 , 347 A.2d 716 (1975) with Ristaino v. Ross, 424 U.S. 589 , 96 S.Ct. *134 1017, 47 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976). See also Commonwealth v.
Cited 12 timesPublished180 Pa. Super. 364 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1956
The complaint was filed on September 15, 1953 and alleged as grounds for divorce from bed and board (1) indignities to the person, and (2) cruel and barbarous treatment. … Clark v. Clark, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 562 , 52 A. 2d 351 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedCommonwealth v. Ashley Borough
37 Pa. Super. 254 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1908
In Com. v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 35 Pa. … The case of Com. v. Yost, 197 Pa. 171 , furnishes no authority for the position here assumed by the appellant.
Cited 2 timesPublished233 Pa. Super. 119 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1975
Act of June 16, 1836, supra, as amended, §27 (V), 5 P.S. §71 (V). This right to a jury trial de novo is mandated by the Pennsylvania Constitution, Art. I,- sec. 6. … “It has long been the law in this Commonwealth that where a board of arbitrators finds two or more defendants jointly liable, an appeal from the arbitrators’ award taken by only one defendant will not be considered an appeal
Cited 12 timesPublished207 Pa. Super. 370 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1966
The action was submitted to a board of arbitrators in accordance with rules of the County Court of Philadelphia adopted pursuant to the Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 715, as amended, 5 P.S. §21 et seq. … The appellant urges that this case is controlled' by Klugman v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 268 , 182 A. 2d 223 (1962).
Cited 16 timesPublishedHakum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
120 Pa. Super. 480 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1935
Co. v. Tamaqua School Disk, 304 Pa. 489, 495 , 156 A. 75 ; Gehret v. Mitten Bank Securities Corp., supra. … Co. v. Welsh & Brown, 104 Pa. Superior Ct. 502 , 159 A. 227 , relied on by the appellant, which runs counter to our opinion here.
Cited 3 timesPublished416 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1992
Indeed, coercive government misconduct was the catalyst for this Court’s seminal confession case, Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 80 L.Ed. 682 , 56 S.Ct. 461 . … Thus the cases considered by this Court over the 50 years since Brown v. Mississippi have focused upon the crucial element of police overreaching.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMarotto v. George D. Ellis & Sons, Inc.
149 Pa. Super. 221 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1942
Opinion by Hirt, J., Judgment was properly entered for defendant in this compensation case on the finding of the referee, affirmed by the board, that there was no injury from accident. … Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co., 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 264 , 3 A. 2d 995 ; Shashura v. Vesta Coal Co., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 161 , 22 A. 2d 441 ; Monahan v. Seeds & Durham et al., 336 Pa. 67 , 6 A. 2d 889 .
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna