Case law

Commonwealth v. Dietterick

429 Pa. Super. 180 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1993

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 95 *186 Pa.Cmwlth. 132,135, 504 A.2d 437, 439 (1986); in turn quoting Commonwealth v. … Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 64 Pa.Cmwlth. 525, 532 , 441 A.2d 470, 475 (1982), affirmed in part and reversed in part, 502 Pa. 7 , 463 A.2d 409 (1983)).

Biddle v. Hall

95 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1928

Nicholson or any of the officers or board of trustees of the corporation, Northern Home *380 for Friendless Children, in connection with the sale of the Merrick property. … Wallace, 252 Pa. 323 ; Raby v. Cell, 85 *382 Pa. 80; Harris v. Blitzstein, 84 Pa. Superior Ct. 498, 501 . The sixth, eleventh and twelfth assignments of error are sustained.

Western Wheeled Scraper Co. v. Butler Township

24 Pa. Super. 477 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1904

The action needed is not that of the individuals who compose the board but of the official body: American Road Machine Co. v. Washington Township, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 105; Weaver v. Powel, 148 Pa. 372 . … Co. v. Ayr Township, 17 Pa. Superior Ct. 419 ; Austin Mfg. Co. v. Ayr Twp., 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 91 .

Com. v. Layer, S.

2025 Pa. Super. 128 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2025

See Brown, 996 A.2d at 476; Cartagena, 63 A.3d at 298. … See Brown, 996 A.2d at 476.

Meenan v. Municipal Paving Co.

94 Pa. Super. 379 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1928

There was evidence therefore to support the finding of the Referee and to justify the action of the Compensation Board and the court below. … Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Company, 263 Pa. 119 .

Maglin v. Peoples City Bank

141 Pa. Super. 329 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1940

That exception, exemplified by Folkman v. Lauer, 244 Pa. 605 , and Kane v. Lauer, 52 Pa. … The cases of Folkman v. Lauer, supra, and Kane v. Lauer, supra, *338 have been cited as authority for appellant’s liability under that exception.

Hakum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

120 Pa. Super. 480 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1935

Co. v. Tamaqua School Disk, 304 Pa. 489, 495 , 156 A. 75 ; Gehret v. Mitten Bank Securities Corp., supra. … Co. v. Welsh & Brown, 104 Pa. Superior Ct. 502 , 159 A. 227 , relied on by the appellant, which runs counter to our opinion here.

Swissvale Borough v. Dickson

68 Pa. Super. 160 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1917

The distinction between the laying out and the opening of a borough or city street has been long recognized: Forbes Street, 70 Pa. 125 ; Whittaker v. Phoenixville Borough, 141 Pa. 327 . … Justice Brown in Scranton Sewer, 213 Pa.

Feldman v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund

2005 Pa. Super. 41 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2005

Pennsylvania State University v. … Hall v. Brown, 363 Pa.Super. 415 , 526 A.2d 413, 416 (1987).

Telech v. Orthodox Catholic Mutual Aid Society of America

63 Pa. Super. 207 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1916

In case of the death of a member or his wife (or husband), the brotherhood shall immediately inform the board of directors and present according to established form, (a) a sworn doctor’s certificate as to the cause of death … It is evident that the court below could not have granted the appellant’s request for binding instructions nor have entered judgment n. o. v.

Cluster House, Inc. v. Reid

297 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1982

See: Quaker Transit Company, Inc. v. Jack W. … See: Johnson v.

McCrum-Howell Co. v. Empfield

50 Pa. Super. 551 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1912

. *556 The plaintiff’s learned counsel relies on the following authorities as to the sufficiency of the notice under the eighth section of the act of 1901: Este v. Penna. R. R. Co., 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 521 ; Willson v. … Canevin, 226 Pa. 362 ; Thirsk v. Evans, 211 Pa. 239 , and Day v. Penna. R. R. Co., 224 Pa. 193 , but we do not think these cases sustain their contention. McVey v.

Grauf v. Reing

95 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1928

The Board found that while the arrangement between Charles V. … There is a clear distinction of fact between this case and those relied on by appellant's, Smith v. State Workmen’s Ins. Fund, 262 Pa. 286 ; Simonton v. Morton, 275 Pa. 562 ; Strunk v. Keller, 75 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Poindexter

301 Pa. Super. 454 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1982

Commonwealth v. Murphy, 493 Pa. 35 , 425 A.2d 352 (1981); Commonwealth v. Jarvis, 482 Pa. 598 , 394 A.2d 483 (1978); Commonwealth v. Brown, 467 Pa. 512 , 359 A.2d 393 (1976). … We said in Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Hightower, D.

2025 Pa. Super. 129 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2025

See Brown, 996 A.2d at 476; Cartagena, 63 A.3d at 298. … See Brown, 996 A.2d at 476. - 24 - J-E03003-24 reasonably expected to hide.

In Re: A.S.D.

175 A.3d 339 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2017

Id. at 229 (Popovich, J., concurring) (citing Commonwealth v. Goodman, 544 Pa, 339, 676 A.2d 234, 236 (1996)). … least two calendar years have elapsed- from the date of completion of a person’s sentence and that-person is not subject to the probation or parole jurisdiction of any court, county probation agency or the Pennsylvania Board

Commonwealth v. Morgan

416 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1992

Indeed, coercive government misconduct was the catalyst for this Court’s seminal confession case, Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 80 L.Ed. 682 , 56 S.Ct. 461 . … Thus the cases considered by this Court over the 50 years since Brown v. Mississippi have focused upon the crucial element of police overreaching.

Commonwealth v. Pounds

281 Pa. Super. 19 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1980

United States v. Perez, 9 Wheat. 579 , 22 U.S. 579 , 6 L.Ed. 165, 1824 . The Court speaking in Green v. … This test was reaffirmed recently in Brown v.

Commonwealth v. Douglass

185 Pa. Super. 269 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

She described the defendant as follows: “. . . he had on a blue and white plain shirt, stripes, plain like, and a brown pair of army pants, and his hair fixed exactly as it is now.” … It was perfectly proper to permit the victim to explain why she had told the magistrate that the appellant was not the robber: Com. v. Del Vaecio, 299 Pa. 547, 553 , 149 A. 696 ; Com. v.

Gierak v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.

101 Pa. Super. 397 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1931

This agreement was approved by the Workmen’s Compensation Board on August 6, 1928. … See Murrell v. In *401 dustrial Commission (Ill.), 126 N. E. 189 ; Bell v. Terry and Tench Co., 163 N. Y. 733 ; 177 App. Div. 123 .