Case law

Security T. & T. Co. v. Welsh & Brown

104 Pa. Super. 502 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1931

Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine

449 Pa. Super. 667 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1996

Brown, who was approximately 16 weeks pregnant, began experiencing difficulties with the pregnancy. Mrs. Brown contacted Dr. … In Botek v.

Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

314 Pa. Super. 78 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1983

In Campbell v. … Johnson v.

Commonwealth of Pa. v. Wm. v. Brown

82 Pa. Super. 81 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1923

Board v. Bell Telephone Co.

211 Pa. Super. 702 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1967

Commonwealth v. Brown

93 Pa. Super. 190 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1928

In Commonwealth v. Brown, 264 Pa. 85, 90 , Mr. … We held in Commonwealth v. Pezzner, 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 289 , that the error was not cured by defendant’s answer in the negative.

Brown v. Schwartz

146 Pa. Super. 472 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1941

Nor need we discuss whether the authority of the ruling of this court in Maxwell v. Hausman, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 83, relied on by the lower court, has been weakened by the later decision of the Supreme Court in Curry v. … See Haines v. Levin, 51 Pa. 412, 414 .

Brown v. Insurance Co. of North America

212 Pa. Super. 741 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1968

APART. OWNERS & MANAGERS, ETC. v. Brown

252 Pa. Super. 539 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1977

BROWN, Officially as District Attorney of Centre County, Pennsylvania. Henry F. GNAS v. NATALIE'S TOWING SERVICE, INC., Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 14, 1976. … Markman, 82 Pa.Super. 478 (1924); Bankers' Commercial Security Co. v. Brennan, 75 Pa.Super. 199 (1920); R. Brown, supra, § 111; Annot., 48 A.L.R.2d 894 (1956). *546 Our supreme court in Meyers v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Brown v. Marino

91 Pa. Super. 201 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1927

L. p. 307, Sec. 5; p. 312, Sections 11 &c.; Richards’ App., 57 Pa. 105 ; Audenried v. R. R. Co., 68 Pa. 370 ; 32 C. … This distinction is so well settled that discussion is unnecessary, and it is incorporated in section seven; see Com. v. Simon, 6 D. & C., 93.

Brown v. Pitcairn Borough

47 Pa. Super. 413 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1911

All the assignments of error are. to the charge, and counsel for appellee move to quash the appeal upon the authority of Curtis v. Winston, 186 Pa. 492 . In that case Mr. … Curtis v. Winston has been cited and applied many times since it was decided, and as late as Lindsay v. Dutton, 227 Pa. 208 , and Com. v. Johnston, 44 Pa. Superior Ct. 218 .

Anderson, B. v. Brown & Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2021

: : BROWN & BROWN OF LEHIGH : VALLEY, LP; HULL & COMPANY, INC. … & Brown of Lehigh Valley, LP.1 We affirm.

Kulp v. Board of Inspectors

102 Pa. Super. 310 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1931

Kulp, in his own name simply, seeks mandamus against the Board of Inspectors of the Berks County Prison, of which board he is a member, that we command them to comply with the statutes of May 19, 1923, P. … Com. ex rel., 28 Pa. 108 ; Com. ex rel. v. Mitchell, 82 Pa. 343 ; Stegmaier v. Jones, 203 Pa. 47 ; Underwood v. Gendell, 227 Pa. 214 .

Gordon L. Brown Associates v. Charnita, Inc.

329 Pa. Super. 325 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1984

DeSilvio v. Restauire, 264 Pa.Superior Ct. 528, 400 A.2d 211 (1979). The rule applies whether the action is beneficial or not. Rose v. Rose, 385 Pa. 427 , 123 A.2d 693 (1956). … “an attorney who obtains a judgment for his client has continuing authority to act for him in protecting the judgment against any proceeding in the action to avoid it.” 7 Am.Jur.2d 166 (1983), In a New York case, Hendry v.

Augustine v. E. M. Brown, Inc.

205 Pa. Super. 33 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1965

Brown v. Maryland & Pennsylvania Railroad

719 A.2d 807 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1998

. §§ 151-188 , which was enacted to “eliminate the crippling effect of labor disputes that threaten railway interstate commerce,” Espinosa v. … Wilson v. New, et al., Receivers of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., 243 U.S. 332 , 37 S.Ct. 298 , 61 L.Ed. 755 (1917). See also General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v.

Brown v. Saltillo Bor. Coun. (Et Al.)

137 Pa. Super. 599 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1939

The referee, the board, and a common pleas court sustained the position of the claimant and we agree with that conclusion. … In the case of Garman v. Cambria Trust Co., 88 Pa. Superior Ct. 525 , the employee was a messenger for two employers and was injured while on an errand for both.

Tax Review Board v. Weiner

186 Pa. Super. 47 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1958

Com. v. Shires, D., II

240 A.3d 974 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2020

… Shires II, supra (unpublished memorandum at 2). 2 Gagnon v. … Commonwealth v. Elliott, 50 A.3d 1284, 1288 (Pa. 2012).

Turner v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

161 Pa. Super. 16 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1947

Com. v. Eyler, 217 Pa. 512, 518 , 66 A. 746 ; Com. v. Rouchie et al., 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 594, 605 , 7 A. 2d 102 ; Laubach et al. v. Golley, 283 Pa. 366, 370 , 129 A. 88 . … Com. v. Hildebrand, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 304, 308 , 11 A. 2d 688 .