Case law

Lee v. United States Plywood Corp.

299 Pa. Super. 165 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1982

See Maio v. Fahs, 339 Pa. 180 , 14 A.2d 105 (1940); Brown v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A.2d 836 (1959); Burke v. Duquesne Light Company, 231 Pa. Superior Ct. 412 , 332 A.2d 544 (1974). … See Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1978).

Murphy v. Atlantic Refining Co.

74 Pa. Super. 166 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1920

determination of quantity is imposed with respect to the sale of liquids, and this method is to be a uniform and mandatory system throughout the State, and therefore, repeals any local statutes in conflict therewith: Com. v. … Brown, 210 Pa. 29, p. 39 . The Act of 1862 had previously fallen into disuse, so far as related to Allegheny County, and had been annulled as to distilled liquors by the federal internal revenue laws.

Hanson v. Hanson

177 Pa. Super. 384 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955

L. 1237, as amended, 23 PS §46 provides: “In case of divorce from the bonds of matrimony or bed and board, the court may, upon petition, in proper cases, allow a wife reasonable alimony pendente lite and reasonable counsel … See Dicken v. Dicken, 56 D. & C. 531. That a trial Judge may be *387 lieve the suit will fail does not warrant refusal. Murray v. Murray, 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 573 .

Vandenberg v. Siter

204 Pa. Super. 392 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1964

Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall A Bro., Inc., 295 Pa. 131, 139 , 144 A. 909, 912 (1929). In Victorson v. Albert M. … See Torrance v. Durisol, Inc., 20 Conn. Supp. 62 , 122 A. 2d 589 (1956); W. T. Adams Machine Co. v. Turner, 162 Ala. 351 , 50 So. 308 (1909).

Com. v. Beatty, B.

2025 Pa. Super. 96 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 2025

Commonwealth v. Brown, 196 A.3d 130, 150 (Pa. 2018). … Commonwealth v. Cox, 983 A.2d 666, 678 (Pa. 2009); see also Brown, 196 A.3d at 150–51.

Potter v. Greenberg

24 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1904

If we are correct in our construction of the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant the statute of frauds and perjuries has no application: Malone et al. v. Keener, 44 Pa. 107 . … This case is quoted with approval in Crawford v. Pyle and Brown, 190 Pa. on p. 272.

Hattoum v. Hattoum

295 Pa. Super. 169 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1982

Viehdeffer v. Viehdeffer, 235 Pa. Super. 447 , 344 A.2d 613 (1975). … Heller v. Yellin, 174 Pa.Super. 292 , 101 A.2d 452 (1953).

Kordich v. Kordich

192 Pa. Super. 33 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1960

Scherer v. Scherer, 191 Pa. Superior Ct. 450 , 156 A. 2d 358 (1959). … Kordich v. Kordich, supra.

Commonwealth v. Cole

274 Pa. Super. 106 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1979

Commonwealth v. Brown, 462 Pa. 578 , 342 A.2d 84 (1975); Commonwealth v. Speller, 445 Pa. 32 , 282 A.2d 26 (1971). Appellant also argues that the jury was prone to impose the death penalty. … Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Clark

2000 Pa. Super. 14 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2000

In Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Hirsh v. Patrick McGovern, Inc.

100 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1929

Phila., 171 *5 Pa. 485; Stork v. Phila., 195 Pa. 101 ; Mellor v. … of view: Stork v.

Commonwealth v. Snyder

123 Pa. Super. 523 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1936

Snyder, and the Board of Education of the City of Reading, Pennsylvania, is hereby authorized to pay all of said monies due under this verdict to John B. … See Commonwealth v. Leib, 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 113 ; Commonwealth v. Brown, 96 Pa. Superior Ct. 13 ; Commonwealth v. Powers, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 319 , 168 A. 328 ; Commonwealth v. Winegrad, 119 Pa.

In Re Premises 250 N. Front Street

110 Pa. Super. 605 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1933

Two assessors of the district affirmed this action, the board of review on appeal ratified the assessment, and it was sustained by the learned court below. … Co. v. Northumberland Co. Commrs., 229 Pa. 460 , 79 A. 109 ; Kaemmerling’s App., 282 Pa. 78 , 127 A. 439 ; DuBois’ App., 293 Pa. 186 , 142 A. 134 .

Com. v. Anthony, D.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2018

See Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Estey Co. v. Dick

41 Pa. Super. 610 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1910

Weaver, 1 Yeates, 478 ; Easton v. Worthington, 5 S. & R. 130; Kusenberg v. Browne, 42 Pa. 173 . … Purinton, 2 Hall, 561 ; Coliman v. Collins, 2 Hall, 569 ; Stevens v. Boston & W. R. R. Corp., 74 Mass. 262 ; Clark v. Lowell & L. R. R. Co., 75 Mass. 231 ; Gilson v. Gwinn, 107 Mass. 126 ; Travis v.

Yurski v. Continental-Archbald Coal Co.

157 Pa. Super. 201 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1945

Norris v. Phila. Life Insurance Co. et al., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 293, 296 , 9 A. 2d 159 . … Consequently, at most the record should be returned to the board for further hearing and determination.

Braslow, M. v. Guthrie/Robert Packer Hosp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 2026

Brown v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 142 A.3d 1, 6–7 (Pa. Super. 2016) (citation omitted); see also Pa.R.A.P. 313(b). All three factors must be present before an order may be considered collateral. Brooks v. … See Brown v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 142 A.3d 1, 8 (Pa.

Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. Minehart

430 Pa. 66 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1968

In Altieri v. Allentown Retirement Board, 368 Pa. 176, 180, 181 , 81 A. 2d 884, 886 (1951), we unanimously held: “As was said in Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. … Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. McGovern, supra, at p. 164 ; see also Kurtz v. Pittsburgh, 346 Pa. 362, 373 , 31 A. 2d 257 .”

Langhorne Manor Borough v. Clayton

129 Pa. Super. 557 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1937

To the same effect are Haspel v. O’Brien, 218 Pa. 146 , 67 A. 123 and Com. v. … The result is analogous to that created by an amendment where the continuity of the re-enacted portion is not affected: Com. v. Salary Board, 322 Pa. 138, 141 , 185 A. 278 .

Latnee v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

55 Pa. Super. 362 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1913

There were two boys, Dillon and Wirtz, riding on the rear end of plaintiff’s wagon, sitting on the tail *364 board, and they were both witnesses for plaintiff and they both testified in substance that the car did not strike … The plaintiff is barred from a recovery by the doctrine of Hicks v. Transit Co., 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 174 . See also Omslaer v. Traction Co., 168 Pa. 519 ; Smith v. Traction Co., 187 Pa. 110 .