Case law

Scavo Motor Vehicle Operator License Case

206 Pa. Super. 544 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1965

See Pennsylvania State Athletic Commission v. Bratton, 177 Pa. … unanimous Court said, “where judicial review discloses material errors in the administrative proceeding and the reviewing court cannot enter a conclusive order, the matter usually must be returned to the administrative board

Wilson v. Hess

77 Pa. Super. 515 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1921

The drinks he received in Hess’s saloon were called ginger brandy and served from a brown unlabeled 5 by 8 bottle, over the bar. … The drunkard has not the will to resist temptation and for this reason the sale to him is forbidden: Davis v. McKnight, 146 Pa. 610 ; Littell v. Young, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 205 ; Bier v. Myers, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 158 .

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palmer v. Ashe

167 Pa. Super. 88 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

His maximum sentence will expire on August 26, 1957, as the result of previous action by the Pennsylvania Parole Board. … Townsend v. Burke, 361 Pa. 35, 39 , 63 A. 2d 77 ; Com. ex rel. Hovis v. Ashe, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 30 , 67 A. 2d 770 .

First Nat'l Bank v. Bank of Pittsburgh

99 Pa. Super. 600 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1930

Again, in Sheafer v. … Brown, 2 Watts 209 ; Eby v. Eby’s Assignee, 5 Pa. 435 . This presumption does not bar the debt, however.

Petition of Sulewski

113 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1934

If it is for the best interests and welfare of the child that it be left in the custody of a third person the court may so order: Com. ex rel. v. Faxstein, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 243 ; Com. ex rel. v. Hoffman, 91 Pa. … Superior Ct. 213 ; Com. v. Mauch, 91 Pa. Superior Ct. 220 . See also, Com. ex rel. v. Blatt, 165 Pa. 213 , 30 A. 674 ; Com. v. Strickland, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 ; Herr v. Herr, 15 York 198 ; Stambaugh v.

Shuman v. Shuman

195 Pa. Super. 155 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1961

See also Albrecht v. Albrecht, 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 650 , 107 A. 2d 209 . In Campana v. Campana, 186 Pa. … This was recognized in Bowen v. Bowen, 124 Pa.

Petrovich Appeal

155 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1944

For instance, one in possession of land may obtain a rule against a person claiming title to bring an action of ejectment: Short v. Board of School District of Upper Moreland Township, 108 Pa. … Co. v. Kelly, 185 Pa. 131 , 39 A. 832 ; Know v. Noggle, 328 Pa. 302 , 196 A. 18 ; H. O. L. C. v. Edwards, 329 Pa. 529, 531 , 198 A. 123 ; Beckman v. Altoona Trust Co., 332 Pa. 545 , 2 A. 2d 826 ; Kowatch et al. v.

Landis, J. & D. v. Wilt, L.

2019 Pa. Super. 321 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2019

In 1967, the Wilts’ revised subdivision plan for Smith Gardens was approved by the East Manchester Township Board of Supervisors and recorded. … Rahn v. Hess, 106 A.2d 461, 464 (Pa. 1954).

Trostel v. Reading Steel Products Corp.

152 Pa. Super. 273 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1943

The learned and famous Judge Agnew explains the circumstantial evidence rule very clearly and simply in Brown v. … Justice Stern in Giordano v. Martin et al., 347 Pa. 61 , 31 A. 2d 504 . 2 Hickerson v. Daskam, 313 Pa. 379 , 169 A. 769 . See also Henderson v. Horner, 287 Pa. 298 , 135 A. 203 ; Smith v. Jamison, 89 Pa.

Bonavitacola v. Cluver

422 Pa. Super. 556 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1993

Limestone Products & Supply Co. v. Tom Brown[,] Inc., 198 Pa.Super. 375 , 181 A.2d 696 (1962), citing Burton v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co., 368 Pa. 613, 517 , 84 A.2d 320 [310] (1951). … Davis v.

Commonwealth v. Mosley

261 Pa. Super. 198 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1978

Commonwealth v. Brown, 464 Pa. 625 , 347 A.2d 716 (1975). … Commonwealth v. Schmidt, 437 Pa. 563 , 263 A.2d 382 (1970).

Estate of Olive Aiken

103 Pa. Super. 279 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1931

L. 132: Maceirinas v. Chesna, 299 Pa. 70 . … As a lay member he cannot do anything which will divert the church property from the uses with which it is impressed: Ryan v. Dunzilla, 239 Pa. 486 .

Com. v. Mapp, N.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2018

Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 767 A.2d 576, 579 n.2 (Pa.Super. 2001).

Majors v. Majors

153 Pa. Super. 175 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1943

In Gilchrist v. … In Kaufman v.

Young Antics, Inc. v. Jaymar Realty Corp.

245 Pa. Super. 244 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1976

See Balke v. Vallier, 23 Chest. 258 (1974); Brown v. Baughman, 15 Adams Co. … See, e. g., Spicer v. Yorktowne Mutual Insurance Co., 9 Adams Co.L.J. 41 (1967); Smith v. Motor Freight Express, Inc., 81 Dauphin 121 (1963); Barry v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 111 Pitts.L.J. 452 (1963).

Weldcraft Equipment Co. v. Crum & Forster Insurance Companies

225 Pa. Super. 420 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1973

MacDonald v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 304 Pa. 213 , 155 A. 491 (1931); Lucas v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 , 176 A. 514 (1935); Lentin v. … See generally Klein & Brown, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 59 Misc. 2d 395 , 299 N.Y.S. 2d 298 (1969), rev’d on other grounds, 316 N.Y.S. 2d 552 (App.

Commonwealth v. Dennis

2001 Pa. Super. 281 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2001

Commonwealth v. Brown, 741 A.2d 726, 733 (Pa.Super.1999). “There is a heavy burden of persuasion upon one who challenges the constitutionality of a statute. … Commonwealth v. Gaskins, 692 A.2d 224, 228 (Pa.Super.1997). ¶ 15 Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Morris v. Kauffman

120 Pa. Super. 515 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1935

Connor, 318 Pa. 17 , 177 A. 817 ; Rhoads v. Herbert, 298 Pa. 522 , 148 A. 693 . … Brown, 257 Pa. 37 , 101 A. 77 ; Johnson v. Abbotts Alderney Dairies, 295 Pa. 548 , 145 A. 605 . The language of the opinion in Yeager v.

Schu Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh

143 Pa. Super. 101 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1940

Brown et al., 322 Pa. 171 , 185 A. 304 . This rule does not apply, however, where, as here, the defendant’s conduct brought about or created the sudden emergency: Casey v. … In Mashinsky et al. v.

Ewing v. Alan Wood Steel Co.

138 Pa. Super. 519 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1939

The board affirmed that award and, on appeal to a court of common pleas, judgment was entered for the claimant. … The content of the word “property” is larger *524 than that of “premises” when employed in that connection : Boscola v. Penna. C. & C. Co., 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 456, 459 ; Molek v. W. J. Rainey, Inc., 120 Pa.