Case law

Zavatskie v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

103 Pa. Super. 598 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1931

We held in Johnson v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co., 99 Pa. … We emphasized this fact in the case of DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Co., 99 Pa.

Com. v. Peters, D.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2018

Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. Super. 2015) (citations and quotation marks omitted). … Commonwealth v. Holmes, 933 A.2d 57, 60 (Pa. 2007) (emphasis added) (citing Robinson v. Pa.

Commonwealth v. Kunco

173 A.3d 817 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2017

Cynthia Brzo-zowski, a member of ABFO’s board of directors. … See Commonwealth v. Conway, 14 A.3d 101 , 108 n.2 (Pa. Super. 2011). Second, pursuant to Commonwealth v.

Shoemaker v. Line Lexington Mutual Fire Insurance

16 Pa. Super. 18 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1901

In Moore v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 196 Pa. 30 , Mr. … It will not be denied that, under the general power contained in article 8, the board of managers could have changed the limit of insurance provided for in article 3.

Commonwealth v. Mullins

2006 Pa. Super. 215 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2006

Commonwealth v. … . — The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole may request of the board an assessment of an offender or sexually violent predator be conducted *1016 and provide a report to the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

Home for Colored Children v. Directors of the Poor & the House of Employment

72 Pa. Super. 106 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1919

The court below was of the opinion that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover and directed a verdict for the defendants relying on Wilkes-Barre Hospital v. … This case is radically different in its facts from Wilkes-Barre Hospital v. Luzerne County, supra.

Scholl v. Scholl

154 Pa. Super. 57 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1943

J., The appellant filed her libel asking for a divorce from bed and board on the grounds of cruel and barbarous’ treatment and indignities to her person. … This complied in principle with the ruling of the Supreme Court in Heilbron v. Heilbron, 158 Pa. 297 , 27 A. 967 , and our ruling in Ponthus v. Ponthus, 70 Pa. Superior Ct. 39 .

Gumbes Estate

172 Pa. Super. 59 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1952

Katz, Admrx. v. Lockman, 356 Pa. 196, 200 , 51 A. 2d 619 ; Brown Pennsylvania Evidence 245. … Broadrick v. Broadrick, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 225 ; Wolfe v. Scott, 275 Pa. 343, 346 , 119 A. 468 .

Wynnewood Civic Ass'n v. Lower Merion Township

180 Pa. Super. 453 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1956

In Griffiths v. … After referring to the case of Griffith v.

Com. v. Dukes, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2017

Commonwealth v. … - 15 - J-S59027-17 ruling states.”); see also Disciplinary Board File No. 180 DB 2011 (Pa. 2014).

Commonwealth v. Stokes

294 Pa. Super. 529 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1982

Counsel recalled that he was advised by Appellant that he “could handle the matter before the Federal Parole Board without any difficulty whatsoever”. … Washington v.

Fitzsimmons v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

56 Pa. Super. 365 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1914

The same thought is reiterated by Judge Brown in Lanning v. Railways Co., 229 Pa. 575 , “The appellees were not required to establish the negligence of the defendant by direct or positive proof. … See also Zercher v. Transit Co., 50 Pa. Superior Ct. 324 ; Matthews v. Railroad Co., 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 10 .

Commonwealth v. Hicks

209 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1966

The tenants had described the intruder to the police as a negro with a brown coat and mustache. … State v. Terry, supra; People v. Peters, 18 N.Y. 2d 238 , 219 N.E. 2d 595 (1966); People v. Rivera, supra.

Nifas, R. v. Darr, S.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2015

Williams v. Syed, 782 A.2d 1090, 1093 (Pa. Commw. 2001). The trial court dismissed Appellant’s complaint pursuant to Brown v. Pa Dep’t of Corr., 932 A.2d 316 (Pa. Commw. 2007). … The Brown Court held the DOC policy to be constitutional. Id. at 322. The Third Circuit has reached the same result. Fontroy v. Beard, 559 F.3d 173, 184 (3d Cir. 2009).

Reliance Insurance v. Richmond MacHine Co.

309 Pa. Super. 430 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1983

See also Moltz v. … (Plastics Division) v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 14 Pa.Commw. 603, 609, 324 A.2d 813, 817 (1974). See also, Travelers Insurance Co. v.

Com. v. Bradley, K.

232 A.3d 747 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 2020

State Ass’n of Jury Comm’rs v. Commonwealth, 64 A.3d 611, 618 (Pa. 2013) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). In Commonwealth v. Brown, 26 A.3d 485 (Pa. … Brown, 26 A.3d at 493 (citations omitted).

Commonwealth v. Fink

2011 Pa. Super. 141 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2011

See also Commonwealth v. Brown, 18 A.3d 1147 (Pa.Super.2011). … “To phrase it differently, ‘[Cjounsel’s constitutional error [must have] caused a total failure in the relevant proceeding.’ ” Brown, 18 A.3d at 1156 . See also Reed, 971 A.2d at 1226 (quoting Commonwealth v.

Schmitt v. William G. Johnston Co.

136 Pa. Super. 213 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 1939

The Board of Directors feel that this action is necessary in order to maintain our organization, thus preventing any merger or consolidation with any other concerns. … Vernon Rettew Co. v. Heller, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 440, 444 , 171 A. 293 ; Howard v. Siegel, 121 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Lacy

224 Pa. Super. 341 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1973

When they reached that intersection, they saw four young men, among them Leon Holt, Keith Lacy, and Erik Brown. The fourth individual was a minor. These four began to follow the Roses at a fast pace. … Commonwealth v. Johnston, 438 Pa. 485, 488 , 263 A. 2d 376 (1970).

Good v. Good

113 Pa. Super. 592 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1934

The burden of proof is upon the libellant to establish every essential fact by clear and satisfactory proofs which it is our duty to scrutinize with proper care: Buys v. Buys, 56 Pa. Superior Ct. 338 ; Aikens v. … Superior Ct. 424 ; Dailey v. Dailey, 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 461 , 161 A. 475 ; Picciano v. Picciano, 110 Pa.