Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.00s
Brown v. Pennsylvania Railroad
66 Pa. Super. 483 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1917
Cited 0 timesPublishedBeaumont Condo. Assoc. v. Brown
181 A.3d 378 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. McClure Newspaper Syndicate
183 Pa. Super. 316 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1957
Stein v. Greene, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 464, 467 , 116 A. 2d 308 ; Gregory v. Fassett, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 599 , *318 606, 116 A. 2d 304 .
Cited 5 timesPublished153 Pa. Super. 293 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1943
The referee and the board found 35% partial disability and modified the agreement to provide weekly payments of $6.47. The lower court affirmed. … Mohr v. Desimone & Sayers, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 , 167 A. 504 ; Flour v. Penna. Railroad Co., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 ; Kucinic v. United Eng. & Fdy. Co., 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 261 , 168 A. 344 ; Johnson v.
Cited 3 timesPublished111 Pa. Super. 598 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1933
Brown it was as to physical facts which, coupled with the testimony of Mrs. Brown, was clearly competent. … Brown was on.”
Cited 11 timesPublishedBrown v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins.
190 A.3d 745 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown v. Granite Mutual Insurance
216 Pa. Super. 774 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1970
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown, Zajacek & Roth v. Ronca
306 Pa. Super. 615 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
223 Pa. Super. 702 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 1972
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown, F. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
208 A.3d 1122 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2019
Brown R. Item #951. … Jones v.
Cited 23 timesPublished149 Pa. Super. 192 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1942
See Sugden v. … See also Maxwell v. Griswold, 10 Howard (U. S.) 242, 256; Swift Co. v. United States, 111 U. S. 22, 30 . In Borough of Allentown v.
Cited 6 timesPublished306 A.3d 883 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2023
Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Minteer), 762 A.2d 328, 330-31 (Pa. 2000) (citation omitted). … Schriver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Department of Transportation), 176 A.3d 459, 463 n.11 (Pa.
Cited 0 timesPublished306 A.3d 883 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2023
In DeLong v. Miller, 426 A.2d 1171 (Pa. … The Majority quotes from Bell v. Kater, 943 A.2d 293 (Pa.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp.
433 Pa. Super. 131 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1994
Brown. Dr. Fineman testified that Mr. Brown’s thickening condition had no impact on his ability to perform any of life’s functions. Deposition testimony of Dr. Fineman 9/19/91 at 43. Dr. … Blackwell v. Commonwealth, State Ethics Comm'n, 527 Pa. 172, 188 , 589 A.2d 1094, 1102 (1991) (quoting Commonwealth v. Cabeza, 503 Pa. 228, 233 , 469 A.2d 146, 148 (1983)).
Cited 5 timesPublishedProduce Factors Corp. v. Brown
197 Pa. Super. 626 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1962
Brown v. Esposito, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 147 , 42 A. 2d 93 (1945); 2 Goodrich-Amram, Standard Penna. Practice, §§2002(a)-15, 19. As we pointed out in Brown v. Esposito, supra ( 157 Pa. … That it was required to do no more is implicit in our statement concerning the plaintiffs in Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublished177 Pa. Super. 369 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955
The court accordingly reversed the Board and entered judgment for the defendant employer. Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to the claimant, as we must (Baumann v. Howard J. Ehmke Co., 126 Pa. … These are the undisputed facts: The decedent Brown was a resident of Rosehill, North Carolina.
Cited 4 timesPublished168 Pa. Super. 554 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1951
Brown, trading as Tom Brown, to sell to the latter its inventory in bulk under the Bulk Sales Act for the sum of $20,851.43. … In Benedict & Eberle Co. v. Hollman, supra, a creditor of the vendor issued an execution attachment and summoned as garnishee an escrow holder of the purchase price.
Cited 2 timesPublished996 A.2d 561 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2010
996 A.2d 561 (2010) FEDERAL HOME LOAN v. BROWN. No. 299 WDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. March 19, 2010. Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished138 Pa. Super. 350 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1939
See Dougherty v. Merchants Baking Co., 313 Pa. 557 , 169 A. 753 , and Goddard v. Armour & Co., 136 Pa. Superior Ct. 158 , 7 A. 2d 79 . … Looking when his vision was obstructed was unavailing, and did not fulfill his legal duty: Dixon v. Pentony, 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 443, 445 , 176 A. 782 . In Bowers v.
Cited 6 timesPublished695 A.2d 864 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1997
However, Pollard was decided prior to Mimms, Brown and Maryland v. Wilson. … See Commonwealth v. Edmunds, 526 Pa. 374 , 586 A.2d 887 (1991); Commonwealth v. White, 543 Pa. 45 , 669 A.2d 896 (1995) (decided after Brown); Commonwealth v.
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna