Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

0.99s

  • US Bank v. Brown

    986 A.2d 1295 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2009

    BANK v. BROWN. No. 3351 EDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. September 9, 2009. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. SECURITY SERVICES

    981 A.2d 305 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2009

    981 A.2d 305 (2009) BROWN v. SECURITY SERVICES. No. 1372 EDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. June 2, 2009. Vacated and Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, D.

    968 A.2d 787 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2009

    968 A.2d 787 (2009) COM. v. BROWN, D. No. 900 EDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. January 21, 2009. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, D.

    964 A.2d 429 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 2008

    964 A.2d 429 (2008) COM. v. BROWN, D. No. 191 MDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. October 8, 2008. Vacated and Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wanamaker & Brown v. Carter

    22 Pa. Super. 625 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1903

    It was settled in Brown v. Sims, 17 S. & R. 138, that goods on storage were exempt, though the business of the tenant was not exclusively that of a warehouseman. … Co. v. Duff, 15 Pa. Superior Ct. 383 . The appellant claims to find a distinction in the cases of Page v. Middleton, 118 Pa. 546 , and Myers v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, M.

    991 A.2d 354 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2010

    991 A.2d 354 (2010) COM. v. BROWN, M. No. 2271 EDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. January 5, 2010. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, S.

    938 A.2d 1109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2007

    938 A.2d 1109 (2007) COM. v. BROWN, S. No. 1885 EDA 2006. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. September 10, 2007. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wanamaker & Brown v. Muldoon

    47 Pa. Super. 114 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1911

    He is only required to answer the interrogatories that may be submitted to him:” Allegheny Savings Bank v. Meyer, 59 Pa. 361 ; Lancaster County Bank v. Gross, 50 Pa. 224 . … entered against a garnishee upon his answers filed, unless those answers contain either a distinct admission of funds in'possession, or of such facts as leave the possession of such funds a mere inference of law: McGeary v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, A.

    968 A.2d 786 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 2009

    968 A.2d 786 (2009) COM. v. BROWN, A. No. 248 WDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. January 12, 2009. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, W.

    929 A.2d 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 2007

    929 A.2d 235 (2007) COM. v. BROWN, W. No. 442 EDA 2006. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. May 23, 2007. Vacated and Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, M.

    919 A.2d 968 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2007

    919 A.2d 968 (2007) COM. v. BROWN, M. No. 459 EDA 2006. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. January 5, 2007. Affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, S.

    965 A.2d 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 2008

    965 A.2d 289 (2008) COM. v. BROWN, S. No. 2056 WDA 2006. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. December 11, 2008. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dutton v. Pyle & Brown

    7 Pa. Super. 353 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 1898

    Justice Trtthkey says in Erie City Iron Works v. Barber, 106 Pa. 125 , wherein he explains the true scope of the decision in Vanleer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Corp. v. Brown

    186 Pa. Super. 46 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1958

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dilworth v. Brown & Bigelow

    128 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 1937

    “The second party agrees to return to Brown & Bigelow on demand all samples, supplies, records, books of instructions or any other property entrusted to him by Brown & Bigelow. … Where a party to a contract prevents performance by the other, it amounts to a breach thereof: Restatement, Contracts, §315; Hall v. Rupley, 10 Pa. 231 ; Miles v. Metzger et al., 316 Pa. 211 , 173 A. 285 . In Bodman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Com. v. BROWN, E.

    890 A.2d 1093 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2005

    890 A.2d 1093 (2005) COM. v. BROWN, E. No. 547 EDA 2005. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. November 9, 2005. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. Borish

    165 Pa. Super. 308 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1949

    The appellant company, Brown & Bigelow, complains, inter alia, that Honey Borish, apellee, failed to set forth a valid and meritorious defense in support of his rule and because of that default and of laches the court erred … Corp. v. Folk, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 588, 591 . The petition to open must not only allege a meritorious defense (State Camp v. Kelley, 267 Pa. 49, 56 , 110 A. 339 ; Commonwealth v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Philadelphia Tribune Co.

    447 Pa. Super. 52 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1995

    See Wolston v. … In Bose v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Weik v. Estate of Brown

    2002 Pa. Super. 63 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2002

    In Clancy v. … See Montanya v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Fulmer v. Brown Machine

    289 Pa. Super. 600 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.