Case law

Coyle v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

149 Pa. Super. 281 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1942

Opinion by Kenworthey, J., On February 14, 1941, about 5:30 p.m., plaintiff boarded one of defendant’s street cars in the City of Pittsburgh. He was his only witness. … See Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 314 Pa. 541 , 171 A. 879 .

Commonwealth v. Thomas

266 Pa. Super. 381 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1979

Commonwealth v. Kelly, 246 Pa.Super. 196 , 369 A.2d 879 (1976); Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 397 , 364 A.2d 330 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hagans, 242 Pa.Super. 393 , 364 A.2d 328 (1976). … In Commonwealth v.

Taylor v. Penrose Motor Co.

101 Pa. Super. 486 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1930

In such circumstances the transaction is to be more rigidly scrutinized than if they constituted only a minority of the board. See Mueller v. Fire Clay Co., supra. … Cowan v.

Prelude, Inc. v. Jorcyk

695 A.2d 422 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1997

DiDio v. Phila. Asbestos Corp., 434 Pa.Super. 191 , 642 A.2d 1088 (1994); Brown v. Phila. Asbestos Corp., 433 Pa.Super. 131 , 639 A2d 1245 (1994). See also, Maritime Electric Co. v. … McKinney, Jr., Assocs. v. Albright, 429 Pa.Super. 440 , 632 A.2d 937 (1993) (applying amended Rule 341 and quashing an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint against one of two defendants); Bell v.

Rissi v. Cappella

2007 Pa. Super. 45 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2007

Birt v. … Martin v. Little, Brown and Co., 304 Pa.Super. 424 , 450 A.2d 984, 987 (1981) (emphasis added). A contract implied in fact can be found by looking to the surrounding facts of the parties’ dealings.

Commonwealth v. Williams

31 Pa. Super. 372 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1906

Opinion by Head, J., Seven of the eight assignments of error in this appeal are identical with those disposed of in the case of Commonwealth v. Thomas H. … With this evidence before them, could a jury fairly infer that the occurrences of the day were of a character to put an honest member of the election board on guard as to the return he would sign?

Leckstein v. Morris

80 Pa. Super. 352 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1922

It follows that separate appeals must be *354 taken from the judgments so entered: Rinker v. Colonial Iron Co., 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 258 ; one appeal cannot apply to both judgments: Cloud v. … The defect was not one that could vary from day to day, but was a broken board, ánd necessarily continued so until replaced.

Commonwealth v. Ratushny

2011 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2011

Dickson, the Sexual Offenders Assessment Board expert, testified that appellant meets the statutory criteria for SVP status including a high risk of re-offense. (Notes of testimony, 8/25/09 at 25.) … R.A.P. 302(a); compare Commonwealth v.

Bowdle v. Ford Motor Co.

169 Pa. Super. 517 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1951

Board and by the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. … Updegraff v. Pa. Game Commission, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 112 , 60 A. 2d 605 . The referee, affirmed by the board, made, inter alia, the following findings of fact: “2.

Com. v. Krzan, J.

325 A.3d 714 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2024

Commonwealth v. Widmer, 560 Pa. 308, 319, 744 A.2d 745, 751–52 (2000); Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 435, 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994). … Brown, 648 A.2d at 1189.

McCullough v. Philadelphia

32 Pa. Super. 109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1906

sectional boards, as established by law; and there is no duty upon or power in the city to control the public schools as one of its affairs: Board of Public Education v. … This case is ruled by Rosenblit v. Philadelphia, 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 587 ; and the city of Philadelphia, as a municipal corporation, cannot be held liable for the injuries of which the plaintiff complains.

Com. v. Luciano, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2025

See Commonwealth v. Jerman, 762 A.2d 366, 368 (Pa. … Commonwealth v. Jones, 912 A.2d 268, 279 (Pa. 2006) (citing 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 303(b)(1)); see also Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Parker

2014 Pa. Super. 253 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2014

Indiana, 714 N.E.2d 624, 627-628 (Ind. 1999) (“[V]erbal conduct intended to assert a fact but phrased as a question is equally capable of being a ‘statement.’”); Brown v. Virginia, 487 S.E.2d 248, 251 (Va. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 512 A.2d 596, 598 (Pa. 1986) (McDermott, J. opinion announcing the judgment of the court).

Krasik v. Duquesne University of the Holy Ghost

293 Pa. Super. 165 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1981

Ivey Co. v. … See Travis v. Teter, 370 Pa. 326 , 87 A.2d 177 (1952), and Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), on lack of property interest in absence of statute or contract.

Keller v. Keller

192 Pa. Super. 603 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1960

The salary to be paid to him was decided by the Board of Directors of this new company to be $15,000 a year, plus an expense account. … Kordich v. Kordich, supra.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Glenn v. Glenn

208 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1966

The statute was never intended to constitute a court a sounding board for domestic financial disagreements, nor a board of arbitration to determine the extent to which a husband is required to recognize the budget suggested … Mitterling v. Mitterling, 201 Pa.

Boyle v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

99 Pa. Super. 178 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1930

M. and arrived home at 3:50; between 5 and 6 a doctor arrived who prescribed for him, and who, in the words of the compensation board, “found him apparently a very sick man, red face, respiration very much increased, temperature … Rapid Transit Co., 283 Pa. 492 , and considered with reference to other authorities in Ripani v. Dittman, 297 Pa. 124, 130 ; see also Dopkin v. C. and I. Co., 296 Pa. 71 ; Broch v. Coal Co., 296 Pa. 502 ; Jones v.

Commonwealth of Penn. v. Jos. L. O'Keefe

95 Pa. Super. 563 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1929

It would take an extreme case to make the action of the trial court, in refusing a continuance, a denial of due process of law: Franklin v. South Carolina, 218 U. S. 161 , 54 L. Ed. 980 . … “Law of the land” means due process of law, the law of the individual case, as established by a fair and open trial or an opportunity given, for one in court and by due course and process of law: Brown v.

Commonwealth v. Hill

251 Pa. Super. 492 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1977

Commonwealth v. McNeil, 461 Pa. 709 , 337 A.2d 840 (1975). … Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); Commonwealth v. Murray, 437 Pa. 326, 329 , 263 A.2d 886 (1970); Commonwealth v. Tookes, 236 Pa.Super. 386, 388 , 344 A.2d 576 (1975).

Com. v. Epps, K.

240 A.3d 640 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2020

See Commonwealth v. Brown, 987 A.2d 699, 712 (Pa. 2009) (A pillar upon which our system of trial by jury is based is that juries are presumed to follow the instructions of the court.”) … Further, as the PCRA court notes, in Commonwealth v. Brown, 134 A.3d 1097 (Pa.