Case law

Barrett v. Fredavid Builders, Inc.

454 Pa. Super. 162 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1996

When he went into the garage, he observed the vinyl siding, exterior foam board insulation, sheet rock, and plywood. Mr. … See also Jones v.

Com. v. Luciano, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2025

See Commonwealth v. Jerman, 762 A.2d 366, 368 (Pa. … Commonwealth v. Jones, 912 A.2d 268, 279 (Pa. 2006) (citing 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 303(b)(1)); see also Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Glenn v. Glenn

208 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1966

The statute was never intended to constitute a court a sounding board for domestic financial disagreements, nor a board of arbitration to determine the extent to which a husband is required to recognize the budget suggested … Mitterling v. Mitterling, 201 Pa.

Davis v. Davis

46 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1911

The right to receive a specific sum out of the income of a trust estate is fiable to execution attachment: Bremer’s Sons v. Mohn, 169 Pa. 91 . … The mere fact that the garnishee can only be called upon to pay out of a particular fund or in certain specific securities, does not exempt the claim from attachment: King, Brown & Co. v.

DiPaolo, D. v. Times Publishing

2016 Pa. Super. 125 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2016

’s website and knew that that board investigates judges for alleged unethical or illegal conduct; (v) Thompson and/or Palatella reviewed the Unicredit case docket and knew no other hearing occurred after the November 10 … See id., quoting Berkeyheiser v.

Bowdle v. Ford Motor Co.

169 Pa. Super. 517 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1951

Board and by the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. … Updegraff v. Pa. Game Commission, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 112 , 60 A. 2d 605 . The referee, affirmed by the board, made, inter alia, the following findings of fact: “2.

Commonwealth v. Thomas

266 Pa. Super. 381 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1979

Commonwealth v. Kelly, 246 Pa.Super. 196 , 369 A.2d 879 (1976); Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 397 , 364 A.2d 330 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hagans, 242 Pa.Super. 393 , 364 A.2d 328 (1976). … In Commonwealth v.

Kutztown Fair Ass'n v. Frey

183 Pa. Super. 516 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

Radnor Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Scott, 277 Pa. 56 , 120 A. 804 ; Uniontown Savings & Loan Co. v. Alicia Land Co., 338 Pa. 227 , 13 A. 2d 65 ; Armstrong Co. B. & L. v. Guffey, 132 Pa. Superior Ct. 19, 25 , 200 A. 160 . … Co. v. Alicia Land Co., p. 231, su *522 pra.

Milburn v. Knights of Columbus Home Ass'n

167 Pa. Super. 509 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1950

Potter, 340 Pa. 485, 487 , 17 A. 2d 338 ; Zieg v. Pittsburgh, 348 Pa. 155, 157 , 34 A. 2d 511 ; Hulings v. Pittsburgh, 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 338, 340 , 28 A. 2d 359”: Miller v. … Brown v. White, 206 Pa. 106 , 55 A. 848 : Weismiller v. Farrell, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 366 , 34 A. 2d 45 .

Commonwealth of Penn. v. Jos. L. O'Keefe

95 Pa. Super. 563 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1929

It would take an extreme case to make the action of the trial court, in refusing a continuance, a denial of due process of law: Franklin v. South Carolina, 218 U. S. 161 , 54 L. Ed. 980 . … “Law of the land” means due process of law, the law of the individual case, as established by a fair and open trial or an opportunity given, for one in court and by due course and process of law: Brown v.

Keller v. Keller

192 Pa. Super. 603 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1960

The salary to be paid to him was decided by the Board of Directors of this new company to be $15,000 a year, plus an expense account. … Kordich v. Kordich, supra.

Com. v. Epps, K.

240 A.3d 640 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2020

See Commonwealth v. Brown, 987 A.2d 699, 712 (Pa. 2009) (A pillar upon which our system of trial by jury is based is that juries are presumed to follow the instructions of the court.”) … Further, as the PCRA court notes, in Commonwealth v. Brown, 134 A.3d 1097 (Pa.

McCullough v. Philadelphia

32 Pa. Super. 109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1906

sectional boards, as established by law; and there is no duty upon or power in the city to control the public schools as one of its affairs: Board of Public Education v. … This case is ruled by Rosenblit v. Philadelphia, 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 587 ; and the city of Philadelphia, as a municipal corporation, cannot be held liable for the injuries of which the plaintiff complains.

Fudula v. Keystone Wire & Iron Works, Inc.

283 Pa. Super. 502 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1981

According to Keystone’s plan, 2 Keystone was obligated to contribute ten per cent of its net income each year to the plan; it could also contribute additional amounts as specially authorized by its Board of Directors (Plan … Hawkins, 416 Pa. 180 , 205 A.2d 429 (1964); Brodt v. Brown, 404 Pa. 391 , 172 A.2d 152 (1961). The question of laches is factual and is determined by examining the circumstances of each case. Siegel v.

International Systems, Inc. v. Personnel Data Systems, Inc.

274 Pa. Super. 500 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1980

Baird v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 30 Pa.Cmwlth. 118, 122 , 372 A.2d 1254, 1257 (1977). … Because the print-outs were admissible to prove the facts contained therein, Baird v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, testimony in support of them was not required.

Commonwealth v. Lehman

265 Pa. Super. 480 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1979

Under the driver’s seat he found a brown bag containing more suspected marijuana separated into three plastic ‘sandwich baggies.’ … The suppression judge then cited Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Kurtz

172 A.3d 1153 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2017

Commonwealth v. Brown, 64 A.3d 1101, 1104 (Pa. Super. 2013) (quoting Commonwealth v. Cauley, 10 A.3d 321, 325 (Pa. Super. 2010)). We may only consider evidence presented at the suppression hearing. … Brown, 64 A.3d at 1104 (quoting Cauley, 10 A.3d at 325). We may reverse only if the legal conclusions drawn from the facts are in error. Id. Commonwealth v.

Fernandes v. Warminster Municipal Authority

296 Pa. Super. 523 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1982

The case was tried de novo on appeal from decision by a board of arbitration. … Commonwealth v. Kinsey, 249 Pa.Super. 1 , 375 A.2d 727 (1977); Commonwealth v. Koch, 288 Pa.Super. 290, 295 , 431 A.2d 1052, 1055 (1981). See also Pittsburgh National Bank v.

Freeman v. Bonner

2000 Pa. Super. 317 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2000

Union Electric Corporation v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review of Allegheny County, 560 Pa. 481, 485 , 746 A.2d 581, 583 (2000). … Union Electric Corporation v.

Lease v. Christy

28 Pa. Super. 507 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1905

Such manifest and designed a violation of duty can find no support in any case in our state: Devall v. Burbridge, 4 W. & S. 305 ; Brown v. Arrott, 6 W. & S. 402 ; Arrott v. Brown, 6 Whart. 9 ; Gordon v. … . & R. 331; Clark v. Bank of Wheeling, 17 Pa. 322 ; Persch v. Quiggle, 57 Pa. 247 .