Case law

Hammerstein v. Lindsay

440 Pa. Super. 350 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1995

Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, supra at 459, 525 A.2d at 1209 . … See also: Harmon Mining Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 157 Pa.Commw. 326, 330 n. 5, 629 A.2d 312 , 314 n. 5 (1993); Smith v.

Grimminger v. Maitra

2005 Pa. Super. 374 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2005

Haddad v. Gopal, 787 A.2d 975, 981 (Pa.Super.2001); see also Moses v. … See Agriss v. Roadway Exp., Inc., 334 Pa.Super. 295 , 483 A.2d 456, 470 (1984); see also Evans v.

Casper v. Philadelphia

55 Pa. Super. 266 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1913

In July, 1912, the plaintiff was summoned to appear before the police board of trial of the department of public safety to answer the charge of “conduct unbecoming an officer.” … That this is a subject of legislative regulation is well shown in Com. v. Black, 201 Pa. 433 , and Koester v. Philadelphia, 46 Pa. Superior Ct. 110 .

Com. v. Scheer, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2023

and Parole (“Board”). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. Super. 2015) (citations omitted).

Com. v. Leap, J.

2019 Pa. Super. 323 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2019

Commonwealth v. Brown, 786 A.2d 961, 971 (Pa. 2001). … See Brown, 786 A.2d at 971. Appellant cites Seese, supra, and Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Akridge

275 Pa. Super. 513 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 1980

In Commonwealth v. … Brown, 252 Pa.Super. 365 , 381 A.2d 961 (1977), ‘mere assertions of due diligence and unproven facts, do not establish cause for an extension under Rule 1100(c).’ Commonwealth v.

Spencer, K. v. Johnson C.

2021 Pa. Super. 48 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2021

See Baker v. … V.

Ham v. Gouge

214 Pa. Super. 423 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1969

Lindsay v. Dutton, 227 Pa. 208, 212 , 75 A. 1096, 1097 (1910); Com. v. Monongahela Bridge Co., 216 Pa. 108, 116 , 64 A. 909, 912 (1906); Floyd v. … In Altsman v.

Commonwealth v. Fisher

261 Pa. Super. 82 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1978

The court found appellant guilty of criminal conspiracy 2 and burglary 3 and ordered the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole to conduct a presentence investigation. … Commonwealth v. Riggins, 474 Pa. 115 , 377 A.2d 140 (1977); Commonwealth v. Bolyard, 256 *84 Pa.Super. 57, 389 A.2d 598 (1978); Commonwealth v. Wertz, 252 Pa.Super. 584 , 384 A.2d 933 (1978). See Commonwealth v.

Slipp v. Fidel. Cas. Co. of N.Y.

91 Pa. Super. 526 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1927

The board and the court below affirmed. As there is evidence to support the finding, we may not interfere with it. … Superior *528 Ct. 95; Dzikowska v. Steel Co., 259 Pa. 578 ; Hale v. Fire Brick Co., 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 454 ; Haddock v. Steel Co., 263 Pa. 120 ; Cymbor v. Binder Coal Co., 285 Pa. 440 . Judgment affirmed.

Kirker v. W. M. McIntosh Co.

156 Pa. Super. 199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1944

The board reversed the referee and made an award, which the court of common pleas affirmed. The defendant and insurance carrier appealed. … See, also, Fulwiler v. Mack-International Motor Truck Corp., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 421 , 9 A. 2d 173 . Appellee stresses our reference to section 237 of the Restatement, Law of Agency, in Freeman v.

Schumacher v. J. C. Wilson, Inc.

157 Pa. Super. 249 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1945

An award in claimant’s favor was affirmed by the board and by the court of common pleas. Defendant appeals. … appeal fall within the familiar principle that questions of fact are ex *251 clusively for the compensation authorities and where, as here, their findings are supported by competent evidence, we cannot disturb them: Williams v.

Commonwealth v. Mefford

2004 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2004

We therefore overrule Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Daniels

281 Pa. Super. 334 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1980

In the instant case, the record reveals that on October 21, 1977 at 4:15 p. m. six police officers went to a boarding house located at 625 Cherry Street, Norristown. … In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Edwards

414 Pa. Super. 488 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1992

While it is clear that, pursuant to Commonwealth v. … On the day Mary Edwards was murdered, Mary Brown, the couples’ daughter, had been visiting for Thanksgiving dinner.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wieczorkowski v. Wieczorkowski

155 Pa. Super. 517 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1944

He testified that he receives no money wages; that his only remuneration for his services is his “board and keep” and all earnings of the business go to his parents. … Elgart v. Elgart, 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 418 , 9 A. 2d 202 .

Frederick v. Action Tire Co.

1999 Pa. Super. 332 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1999

See, e.g., Martin v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 656 A.2d 554, 557-58 (Pa.

Wahl v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

139 Pa. Super. 53 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1939

Opinion by Cunningham, J., In this workmen’s compensation case an award of compensation for partial disability was made by the referee, and affirmed by the board, to Karl Wahl who was accidentally injured on June 24, 1937 … Trust Co. v. Ghriest, 86 Pa. Superior Ct. 71, 74 , and cases there cited. Compare 105 A. L. R. 326-340. At this point the real issue in this case arises.

Brennan v. Kauffman

42 Pa. Super. 196 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1910

Opinion by Beaver, J., In Sallade v. Schuylkill County, 19 Pa. … Little v. Mitchell, 20 L. R. A. 306. The subject is also very fully discussed in a note to Trainor et al. v. Board of County Auditors of Wayne County, 15 L. R.

De Arment v. Kennedy

14 Pa. Super. 539 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1900

It further appears that the lot of ground was benefited by said improvement and was then liable to assessment to pay the cost thereof so soon as a board of viewers should be appointed to report thereon. … Upon these facts, we are of opinion that this case is ruled by Lafferty v. Milligan, 165 Pa. 534 . No well founded distinction can be drawn to take it out of the application of principles there laid down.