Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.73s

  • Higgins, M. v. Nationwide Affinity Ins.

    329 A.3d 701 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 26, 2024

    See also Wilson Area School Dist. v. … at 627; see also Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co., 906 A.2d 571, 579 n. 6 (Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Delahunty v. Lower Chichester Township

    147 Pa. Super. 381 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1941

    J., This workmen’s compensation case, brought by the dependent mother of a volunteer fireman, is ruled in principle by our decision in Lees v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund and Borough of Ferndale, 146 Pa. … went for her board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Shallcross

    165 Pa. Super. 472 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1949

    Hartman & Co., 63 Pa. 97 ) and a settlement at least once a year, plaintiff had been hired for a year: Kane v. Moore, 167 Pa. 275 , 31 A. 631 ; Jones v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co., 295 Pa. 219 , 145 A. 80 ; Swayne v. … Pressed Steel Car Co., 298 Pa. 31 , 147 A. 837 ; Howard v. Siegel, 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 519 , 184 A. 272 ; Lucacher v. Kerson, supra, affirmed in 355 Pa. 79 , 48 A. 2d 857 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Craig v. Ebensburg Borough

    185 Pa. Super. 581 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

    The Supreme Court in Mature v. … The instant case is distinguishable from Valley Forge Gardens v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Raby v. Commercial Banking Corp.

    208 Pa. Super. 52 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1966

    It was the corporation which needed the money to perform a contract; the corporation’s board of directors by resolution authorized the loan; the corporation received the money. … See Pardee v. Fetter, 345 Mich. 548 , 77 N.W. 2d 124 (1956); General Phoenix Corp. v. Cabot, 300 N.Y. 87 , 89 N.E. 2d 238 (1949); 4 Dahmes v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dever v. Kathrins & Golen

    82 Pa. Super. 140 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1923

    It is settled that a defendant has the right to file a supplemental affidavit of defense, at any time during the pendency of a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense: Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. … Howell, 274 Pa. 190 ; Bernstein v. Brown, 55 Pa. Superior Ct. 532 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Watson, A.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2019

    See Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 A.3d 544, 559 (Pa.Super. 2011) (en banc). … Brown, 48 A.3d at 430 (quoting Commonwealth v. Parker, 847 A.2d 745, 750 (Pa.Super. 2004)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Williams v. Aaron Richman & Sons

    212 Pa. Super. 290 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1968

    Beener v. North American Machine Co., Inc., 204 Pa. Superior Ct. 506 , 205 A. 2d 665 (1964). … Here, however, the Board did not say that it disbelieved him but only that his testimony did not meet the required legal standards of certainty. In this, I believe the Board erred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Griffith

    66 Pa. Super. 290 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1917

    preliminary examination, but, fully as much, by the fair treatment of the employee, who after successfully passing the tests imposed in the first instance, renders faithful and loyal adherence to the regulations of the board … “Next to being right, nothing should give more pleasure than to correct the error”: Fuller v. Fisk, 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 489 ; Kelly v. Sun Fire Office, 141 Pa. 10 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nance Unemployment Compensation Case

    197 Pa. Super. 608 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1962

    The board found that by accepting the transportation money the claimant voluntarily terminated his employment. We cannot find any error in the board’s so concluding. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weldon's Estate

    31 Pa. Super. 47 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1906

    Where the honesty of a debt between father and son is impeached and fraud alleged it must be distinctly proved : Reehling v. Byers, 94 Pa. 316 . Such a claim cannot be invalidated by showing that a preference was given. … To do so is neither a fraud in law or fact: Brown’s Appeal, 86 Pa. 524 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Palladino v. Palladino

    713 A.2d 676 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1998

    Calabrese v. Calabrese, 452 Pa.Super. 497, 501-02 , 682 A.2d 393, 395 (1996), allocatur denied, 547 Pa. 722 , 689 A.2d 230 (1997). … Brown v. Brown, 447 Pa.Super. 424 , 669 A.2d 969 (1996), aff'd, 547 Pa. 360 , 690 A.2d 700 (1997).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Szabo v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

    110 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1933

    The board affirmed the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the referee, and, on appeal to the court of common pleas, the board was sustained. … See, also, Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co. et al., 286 Pa. 199 , 133 A. 256 . We have given consideration to all the questions raised in this appeal, but find them without merit.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Nixon

    94 Pa. Super. 333 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1928

    Gartman, 83 Ib. 108; Com. v. Jackson, 86 Ib. 351; Com. v. Shanklin, 87 Ib. 53. … Stock Exchange Thru Whom Order Was Executed Commission New York Our Taxes Commission Total July 1 100 Bdlb 15y2 Morris 15.00 Brown 1.565 100 Bdlb 15y2 & Co. 15.00 1.565 *337 1.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Welsh Bros.

    102 Pa. Super. 54 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1931

    The referee awarded compensation and the compensation board sustained the award; the lower court affirmed the action of the board and entered judgment for the claimant. … Each *58 case must stand on its own facts: Com. v. Werntz, 161 Pa. 591 ; Com. v. Stallone, 281 Pa. 41 ; Com. v. Gardner, 282 Pa. 458 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Shillington Bank Liquidating Trustees' Personal Property Assessment Case

    129 Pa. Super. 316 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1937

    Each set of liquidating trustees took an appeal to the board of county commissioners, sitting as a board of revision and appeal, which sustained the right to make the assessment, but modified the amount thereof. … See, also, Com. v. Sunbeam Water Co., 284 Pa. 180 , 130 A. 405 ; Com. v. Stegmaier Brewing Co., 309 Pa. 52 , 163 A. 175 ; Sellers’ Estate, 325 Pa. 377 , 191 A. 170 ; Tack’s Estate, 325 Pa. 545 , 191 A. 155 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Redding Appeal

    184 Pa. Super. 352 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1957

    Harry v. Eastridge, 374 Pa. 172, 177 , 97 A. 2d 350 . *354 See, also, Rinker Appeal, 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 143, 149 , 117 A. 2d 780 . … On April 22, 1955, at a hearing before President Judge Hazel Brown, he was . . . adjudged delinquent on the charge of ‘Conspiracy to Commit Gang War.’ Strict probation was continued.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Talutto v. Talutto

    375 Pa. Super. 302 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1988

    In March, 1987, the Railroad Retirement Board established regulations under 20 C.F.R. § 295.1 et seq., setting forth a procedure by which the Board would recognize and honor a court Decree or property settlement involving … Morschhauser v. Morschhauser, 357 Pa.Super. 339 , 516 A.2d 10 (1986); Pangallo v. Pangallo, 329 Pa.Super. 25 , 477 A.2d 885 (1984); Remick v. Remick, 310 Pa.Super. 23 , 456 A.2d 163 (1983).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Davison

    243 Pa. Super. 12 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1976

    A similar issue was raised in Commonwealth v. Brown, 234 Pa. Super. 119 , 338 A.2d 659 (1975). The Majority, however, held that the issue had been waived. But see, Commonwealth v. … Brown, supra, (dissenting opinion by Hoffman, J.)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Nace v. Neff College of Oratory

    46 Pa. Super. 237 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1911

    If authority be needed to prove the existence of the general rule just stated it will be found in the recent case *240 of International Coal Mining Co. v. Penna. R. R. Co., 214 Pa. 469 . There Mr. … Justice Brown elaborately reviews the entire question and points out that no right to take depositions in a pending cause existed at common law; that courts of equity, in exceptional cases, guardedly recognized such right

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.