Case law

Commonwealth v. Tanner

205 A.3d 388 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2019

Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Citizens Deposit & Trust Co. v. Citizens Deposit & Trust Co.

136 Pa. Super. 413 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1939

Skiles a regular and agreed sum at regular intervals for his board and room, except during short periods when Harry E. Skiles was unemployed.” … However, it was stipulated that the father paid his son during this time not only for his board, but also for his room.

Hosack v. Taylor Bros.

142 Pa. Super. 83 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1940

Mitchell v. Baldwin L. Works, 265 Pa. 148 , 108 A. 605 . … Horsfield v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 458 , 189 A. 892 ; Meitner v. Scarborough, supra. Judgment affirmed.

Craig v. Ebensburg Borough

185 Pa. Super. 581 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

The Supreme Court in Mature v. … The instant case is distinguishable from Valley Forge Gardens v.

Cohn v. Post

78 Pa. Super. 409 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1922

Elza v. Brown, 59 Pa. Superior Ct. 403 , and cases there cited. Renick & Brand v. Aronoff & Naineark, 76 Pa.

Hutchinson v. Hutchinson

263 Pa. Super. 299 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1979

Grossi v. Grossi, 218 Pa.Super. 64 , 272 A.2d 239 (1970); Commonwealth ex rel. Yannacone v. Yannacone, 214 Pa.Super. 244 , 251 A.2d 694 (1969); Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. … Emrick v. Emrick, supra; Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. Smith, 217 Pa.Super. 1 , 268 A.2d 161 (1970); Commonwealth ex rel. Grossman v. Grossman, 188 Pa.Super. 236 , 146 A.2d 315 (1958); Commonwealth ex rel. Stomel v.

McMahon v. McMahon

167 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

S. §11, provides for a divorce from bed and board upon proof that the husband has “maliciously abandoned his family”. … The proof to support a divorce from bed and board must be as clear as is required in an application for absolute divorce. Jones v. Jones, 144 Pa.

Wood v. Griffith

66 Pa. Super. 290 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1917

preliminary examination, but, fully as much, by the fair treatment of the employee, who after successfully passing the tests imposed in the first instance, renders faithful and loyal adherence to the regulations of the board … “Next to being right, nothing should give more pleasure than to correct the error”: Fuller v. Fisk, 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 489 ; Kelly v. Sun Fire Office, 141 Pa. 10 .

Commonwealth v. Baker

201 A.3d 791 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 24, 2018

Commonwealth v. Widmer, 560 Pa. 308, 319, 744 A.2d 745, 751–[7]52 (2000); Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 435, 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994). … Brown, 648 A.2d at 1189.

Connell v. Cahill Building & Loan Ass'n

124 Pa. Super. 336 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1936

The defense was that Foley had no authority from the board of directors of the association to make the agreement, and Foley himself so testified. … As the liabilities resulting from ratification are the same as those arising from authorization, the court below was fully justified in refusing a new trial and in denying defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.

Szabo v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

110 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1933

The board affirmed the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the referee, and, on appeal to the court of common pleas, the board was sustained. … See, also, Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co. et al., 286 Pa. 199 , 133 A. 256 . We have given consideration to all the questions raised in this appeal, but find them without merit.

AHRCO-Monview v. Eubanks, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2015

Pers., Inc. v. Brown, 789 A.2d 292, 294 (Pa. Super. 2001). … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Isgriggs

227 Pa. Super. 597 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1974

Commonwealth v. Allen, 448 Pa. 177 , 292 A. 2d 373 (1972); Commonwealth v. Bruno, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 407 , 258 A. 2d 666 (1969); Commonwealth v. Trowery, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 171 , 235 A. 2d 171 (1967). … Unlike the situation in Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Keesey

326 Pa. Super. 131 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1984

Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Id. … Hines v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, supra; Gaito v. *135 Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, supra; Rodrigues v.

Blew v. Ryan Township

42 Pa. Super. 510 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1910

The evidence shows that the plaintiff knew that the supervisors allowed.only $1.20 per day for working on the road, yet he undertook to collect $2.50 per day and boarding. … The principle that one cannot make another liable to him by voluntarily discharging a duty which belongs to the other person is recognized in Salsbury v. City of Phila. 44 Pa. 303 . ' In Anderson v.

Menkowitz, E. v. Peerless Publications, Inc.

176 A.3d 968 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2017

The Medical Practice Act of 1985 12 provides that the State Board of Medicine (“State Board”) has the authority to discipline a board-regulated practitioner found guilty of immoral or unprofessional conduct. … In Dunlap v.

King v. Bosserman

13 Pa. Super. 480 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1900

Superior Ct. 156 ; Borrell v. Dewart, 37 Pa. 134 . That the rent was reserved payable in kind by a share of the grain, does not militate against the idea of a lease: Steel v. Frick, 56 Pa. 175 ; Brown v. … We are of opinion that Long v.

Minick v. Marshall

48 Pa. Super. 43 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1911

In Clark v. Martin, 49 Pa. 299 , Woodward, C. … v.

Campbell v. City of Philadelphia

112 Pa. Super. 285 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1933

Prior to the passage of the Act of 1891 the rule as found in Moravian Seminary v. … In Myers et al. v.

Book v. O'Neil

2 Pa. Super. 306 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1896

Davis at a former settlement of the partnership business: ” Van Amringe v. Ellmaker, 4 Pa. 281 ; Knerr v. Hoffman, 65 Pa. 126 ; Canfield v. Johnson, 144 Pa. 61 . … While it is true that a surviving partner is not entitled to compensation for winding up the partnership business, Beatty v. Wray, 19 Pa. 516 ; Brown v.