Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.48s

  • Gbur v. Golio

    2007 Pa. Super. 264 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 2007

    , be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, except as provided in subsection (e). … Smalls v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Kane v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.

    75 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1921

    That has been done in Haines et al. v. Lone Star Shipbuilding Co., 268 Pa. 92 ; and in our own case of Sullivan v. Shipping Board, No. 186, October Term, 1920; see also United States v. Strange et al., U. S. … The money to run the enterprise is to be furnished by the shipping board, but the International Corporation agrees to promptly pay all the labor and material.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gauby v. Gauby

    223 Pa. Super. 92 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1972

    In Commonwealth v. … The statute was never intended to constitute a court a sounding board for domestic financial disagreements, nor a board of arbitration to determine the extent to which a husband is required to recognize the budget suggested

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Siegle v. U. S. Steel Corp.

    302 Pa. Super. 404 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1982

    Associates of Philipsburg v. Hurwitz, 292 Pa.Super. 406 , 437 A.2d 447 (1981). Contra Coyne v. Porter-Hayden Co., 286 Pa.Super. 1 , 428 A.2d 208 (1981); Smith v. Brown, 283 Pa.Super. 116 , 423 A.2d 743 (1980); Snaith v. … Snaith, 282 Pa.Super. 450 , 422 A.2d 1379 (1980); DiSante v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Metzger v. Weller

    113 Pa. Super. 573 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1934

    See Brown v. Schock, 77 Pa. 471, 479 . As to the second position, the record discloses that no exception was taken to the admission of the act of assembly complained of by the defendant. … This appellant was required to do if he desired this court to specifically consider an assignment of error based on the alleged error: Fisher v. The Leader Pub. Co., 239 Pa. 200 , 86 A. 776 ; Gates v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Motte v. Carnegie Coal Co.

    114 Pa. Super. 239 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1934

    The disposition of the appeal is controlled by Ludington v. Russell Coal Company et al., 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 318 , and Barlock v. Orient Coal and Coke Company et al., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 228 , 173 A. 666 . … The board affirmed the referee, but gave an additional credit for the 62 l/6th weeks during which compensation for partial disability had been paid under the second agreement.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re JM

    454 Pa. Super. 276 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1996

    See Brown v. Philadelphia Tribune Co., 447 Pa.Super. 52 , 668 A.2d 159 . (Issues not raised below are waived on appeal, even if issues raised on appeal are of constitutional dimension.) Accordingly, I dissent. … Board of School Directors, 152 Pa.Cmwlth. 348, 353-53 , 618 A.2d 1239, 1240 (1992)(citing Geissler v. Board of Commissioners of Upper Dublin Township, 76 Pa.Cmwlth. 426 , 463 A.2d 1284 (1983)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hastings v. Burchfield

    28 Pa. Super. 309 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1905

    The general rule is that the implied covenant in a lease for quiet and peaceable enjoyment, extends only to the lessor himself or those claiming title paramount: Dobbins v. Brown, 12 Pa. 75 ; Peters v. … In Auer v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Federoff v. Union Collieries Co.

    141 Pa. Super. 308 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1940

    The board classified claimant as a nondescript in the labor market and affirmed the referee’s award. … Compare Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co., 122 Pa Superior Ct. 579, 186 A. 400 ; Kessler v. N. Side Pack. Co., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 565 , 186 A. 404 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Showers

    452 Pa. Super. 135 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1996

    In Commonwealth v. Scoleri, 432 Pa. 571 , 248 A.2d 295 (1968), vacated, Scoleri v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 427 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1185 (1994). It is clear in the instant case that what Diane said to Andrews on the night in question was inconsistent with her trial testimony.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Hare

    36 Pa. Super. 125 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1908

    The evidence introduced and the rulings . of the judge thereon are not properly before us: Com. v. McDougall, 203 Pa. 291 ; Com. ex rel. v. Strickland, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 ; Thatcher’s Requisition, 18 Pa. … S. 650 ; Lascelles v. Georgia, 148 U. S. 537 ; In re Clark, 9 Wend. 212 ; Brown’s Case, 112 Mass. 409 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Evancik v. Coal Mining Co. of Graceton, Inc.

    150 Pa. Super. 27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1942

    Hirt, J., Opinion by In this case, both the referee and the board disallowed *29 compensation and the court affirmed. … Royko v. Logan Coal Co., supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Penny, L.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2021

    Commonwealth v. Rushing, 99 A.3d 416, 420-21 (Pa. 2014). We do not weigh the evidence or make credibility determinations. Commonwealth v. Kane, 10 A.3d 327, 332 (Pa. … The brown box was in the same bedroom with various other controlled substances and paraphernalia.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Shiner v. Moriarty

    706 A.2d 1228 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1998

    and liquor control board was privileged. … Liquor Control Board should not have been admitted to support the re *1243 maining claims.

    Cited 128 timesPublished
  • Antonio v. Pennsylvania Railroad

    155 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1944

    The referee made an award which was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … The court of common pleas reversed the board on the ground that deceased at the time of the accident was engaged in interstate transportation. Claimant has appealed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Alumbaugh v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc.

    226 Pa. Super. 511 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1973

    The five trustees of the Fund are all Wallace employees, appointed by the Board of Directors of Wallace Business Forms, Inc. … As we said in Lewandowski v. General Telephone Company, 223 Pa.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Tanner

    205 A.3d 388 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2019

    Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Boyer v. Boyer

    183 Pa. Super. 260 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1957

    Brown v. Brown, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 490, 493 , 63 A. 2d 130 (1949);, Megoulas v. Megoulas, 166 Pa. Superior Ct. 510, 512 , 72 A. 2d 598 (1950); Smith v. Smith, 157 Pa. … Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256, 269 , 198 A. 154 (1938); Hollister v. Hollister, 6 Pa. 449, 452, 453 (1847); Koch v. Koch, 62 Pa. Superior Ct. 607, 611, 612 .(1916).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Citizens Deposit & Trust Co. v. Citizens Deposit & Trust Co.

    136 Pa. Super. 413 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1939

    Skiles a regular and agreed sum at regular intervals for his board and room, except during short periods when Harry E. Skiles was unemployed.” … However, it was stipulated that the father paid his son during this time not only for his board, but also for his room.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Calderini

    416 Pa. Super. 258 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1992

    Springdale Police Officer Gene Polsinelli, immediately prior to receiving a radio report of the robbery, had observed a large brown sedan pull away from the curb about one block from the pharmacy. … Twenty minutes after the robbery, Officer Joseph Naviglia of the Tarentum Borough Police Department observed a brown Lincoln Continental being driven out of Springdale.

    Cited 27 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.