Case law

Mihalik v. Lattimer Coal Corp.

162 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1948

The referee, affirmed by the board, found that the claimant was totally disabled as the result ofanthraco-silicosis (miner’s asthma), contracted in the course of. his employment with the defendant employer, and made an award … In an attempt to bring itself within our ruling in Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc., 159 Pa.

B.K. ex rel. S.K. v. Chambersburg Hospital

834 A.2d 1178 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2003

See generally Gutteridge v. A.P. … See also, Swift v.

Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE, ETC.

312 Pa. Super. 461 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1983

In Klein v. … Even if an amendment to the pleadings were allowed however, and this issue was added, our decision would not change in this type of case involving a non-licensee of the Liquor Board. . See Sinn v.

Home Financers' Building & Loan Ass'n v. Michael

117 Pa. Super. 391 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1934

Michael, they went to live with their daughter, Helen V. Fitzpatrick, for an agreed board of $10 a week each. No payments were ever made on this obligation as Michael continued unemployed and Mrs. … Fitzpatrick for board and lodging aggregated $4,240. “13.

Commonwealth v. Gillespie

2014 Pa. Super. 245 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2014

The reasonableness of a seizure that is less intrusive than a traditional arrest depends upon a three-pronged balancing test derived from Brown v. … See also Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Wenzel, R.

2021 Pa. Super. 44 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2021

Burkett testified that he was a board-certified chiropractor and licensed to practice in Pennsylvania. N.T. (Trial), 9/5/19, at 175-176. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 240 A.3d 970, 973 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2020) (citation omitted).

Wittlinger v. Millersville Borough

167 Pa. Super. 231 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

The claimant has appealed from an order of the court below dismissing *233 his appeal.from a disallowance of compensation by the referee and the board. … Lees v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 70 , 22 A. 2d 61 , supra; Delahunty v. Lower Chichester Twp., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 381 , 25 A. 2d 90 .

In Re: J.C., Appeal of: J.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2018

The board shall monitor compliance. … Subsequently in Alleyne v.

Grimes v. Wetzler

2000 Pa. Super. 90 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2000

Kachur v. … See Rose v.

Boyer v. Boyer

183 Pa. Super. 260 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1957

Brown v. Brown, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 490, 493 , 63 A. 2d 130 (1949);, Megoulas v. Megoulas, 166 Pa. Superior Ct. 510, 512 , 72 A. 2d 598 (1950); Smith v. Smith, 157 Pa. … Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256, 269 , 198 A. 154 (1938); Hollister v. Hollister, 6 Pa. 449, 452, 453 (1847); Koch v. Koch, 62 Pa. Superior Ct. 607, 611, 612 .(1916).

Commonwealth v. Little

418 Pa. Super. 558 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1992

Since the parties could not resolve their differences, Judge Brown granted Mr. … In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Lopez

415 Pa. Super. 252 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 1992

Commonwealth v. Brown, 388 Pa.Super. 187, 190 , 565 A.2d 177, 178 (1989). See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 287 Pa.Super. 19, 22 , 429 A.2d 698, 700 (1981). … Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 903 (1968); Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, 388 Pa.Super. at 190 , 565 A.2d at 178 .

Commonwealth v. Calderini

416 Pa. Super. 258 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1992

Springdale Police Officer Gene Polsinelli, immediately prior to receiving a radio report of the robbery, had observed a large brown sedan pull away from the curb about one block from the pharmacy. … Twenty minutes after the robbery, Officer Joseph Naviglia of the Tarentum Borough Police Department observed a brown Lincoln Continental being driven out of Springdale.

Commonwealth v. Frankenhauser

248 Pa. Super. 325 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1977

When appellant began serving the New Jersey sentence, a parole violation detainer was lodged against him by the Pennsylvania Board of Parole. Pursuant to the decision of this Court in Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Zuber, supra. 5 This court indicated in Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Easton

338 Pa. Super. 509 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1985

The PCHA court cited Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 313 Pa.Super. 256 , 459 A.2d 837 (1983).

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gauby v. Gauby

223 Pa. Super. 92 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1972

In Commonwealth v. … The statute was never intended to constitute a court a sounding board for domestic financial disagreements, nor a board of arbitration to determine the extent to which a husband is required to recognize the budget suggested

Okeke-Henry, C. v. Southwest Airlines Co.

2017 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2017

(citing Abdullah v. … The court explained: Although we stated in Abdullah v.

Siegle v. U. S. Steel Corp.

302 Pa. Super. 404 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1982

Associates of Philipsburg v. Hurwitz, 292 Pa.Super. 406 , 437 A.2d 447 (1981). Contra Coyne v. Porter-Hayden Co., 286 Pa.Super. 1 , 428 A.2d 208 (1981); Smith v. Brown, 283 Pa.Super. 116 , 423 A.2d 743 (1980); Snaith v. … Snaith, 282 Pa.Super. 450 , 422 A.2d 1379 (1980); DiSante v.

Pittsburg & Lake Erie Railroad v. Peterson

58 Pa. Super. 44 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1914

it is clear that the allegation and justifiable conclusion that the law tribunal having jurisdiction of the parties and the subject-matter erred *51 in giving the judgment, do not alone furnish ground for its exercise: Brown … ’s App., 66 Pa. 155 ; Rockwell v.

Kane v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.

75 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1921

That has been done in Haines et al. v. Lone Star Shipbuilding Co., 268 Pa. 92 ; and in our own case of Sullivan v. Shipping Board, No. 186, October Term, 1920; see also United States v. Strange et al., U. S. … The money to run the enterprise is to be furnished by the shipping board, but the International Corporation agrees to promptly pay all the labor and material.