Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.12s

  • Pudlish v. Pudlish

    2002 Pa. Super. 95 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2002

    See Crews v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Ripkin), 767 A.2d 626 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001). This determination is a question of fact to be resolved by the workers’ compensation judge. Id. … USX Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Way), 754 A.2d 64 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000). 2 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Kerns

    124 Pa. Super. 61 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1936

    See Commonwealth v. Brown, 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 81 . There was legal evidence to prove appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See Commonwealth v. Harman, 4 Pa. 269 . … See Commonwealth v. Mellon, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 20 ; Commonwealth v. Elliott, 292 Pa. 16 , 140 A. 537 ; Commonwealth v. Greenfield et al., 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 489 , 157 A. 50 ; Commonwealth v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • SN, INC. v. Long

    208 Pa. Super. 38 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1966

    Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., 414 Pa. 325 , 200 A. 2d 398 (1964). When ruling upon such a motion the court may consider only the pleadings and documents properly attached thereto. … Bogojavlensky v. Logan, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 312 , 124 A. 2d 412 (1956); Nederostek v. Endicott Johnson Shoe Co., 415 Pa. 136 , 202 A. 2d 72 (1964).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wess v. Diebold Lumber Co.

    141 Pa. Super. 76 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1940

    Cunningham, J., The single question raised by this appeal in a workmen’s compensation case is whether there is on the record substantial competent evidence adequately supporting the finding of the referee, affirmed by the board … This finding was affirmed by the board, and the termination of the agreement accordingly refused.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barton v. Federal Enameling & Stamping Co.

    122 Pa. Super. 587 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1936

    Guiding principles for the disposition of a question of this kind have been announced by this court in Feeney v. N. Snellenburg and Co. et al., 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 284 , 157 A. 379 , and Molek v. W. J. … In the case of Tolan v. Phila. and Reading C. & I.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Yarnall v. Almy

    703 A.2d 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1997

    See Appellant’s Brief at 12 (citing Long v. Brown, 399 Pa.Super. 312 , 582 A.2d 359 (1990)). … Long v. Brown, 399 Pa.Super. 312, 320 , 582 A.2d 359, 363 (1990).

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Cohen

    142 Pa. Super. 199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1940

    Com. v. Simpson, 310 Pa. 380 , 165 A. 498 ; Com. v. Kolsky, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 596 . … Com. v. Dailey, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 510 . Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Capital Bakers, Inc. v. Local Union No. 464 of the Bakery & Confectionary Workers International Union

    281 Pa. Super. 384 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1980

    would have jurisdiction. 43 P.S. 206d; Altemose Construction Company v. … (Emphasis ours) Casco Products Corp. v. Hess Brothers, 184 Pa.Super. 47 , 132 A.2d 922 (1957); Knaus v. Knaus, supra; South Fayette Township v. Boy’s Home, 31 Pa.Cmwlth. 254 , 376 A.2d 663 (1977); Phila.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth ex rel. Mercer v. Banmiller

    193 Pa. Super. 411 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960

    Wilson v. Banmiller, supra, p. 532; Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443 (1953). As “due process” is a concept which does not lend itself to precise definition, almost every conceivable contention is made in its name. … O’Niel v. Ashe, 337 Pa. 230 , 10 A. 2d 404 (1940); Commonwealth v. Green, 396 Pa. 137, 143, 144 , 151 A. 2d 241 (1959); Commonwealth v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Murfit v. Murfit

    134 Pa. Super. 327 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1938

    In Walsh v. Walsh, 117 Pa. … In Mertz v. Mertz, 119 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. E.B. Jermyn Lodge No. 2

    693 A.2d 974 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1997

    V. … Instantly, appellee testified that he presented a letter to the board of directors requesting legal representation, and that various board members asked him questions regarding the requested representation.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Butler Railways Co.

    149 Pa. Super. 404 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1942

    The board, upon claimant’s appeal to it from so ffiiich of the order of the referee as suspended payment of the award, cited, among other cases, Sayre v. Textile Machine Works, 129 Pa. … Claimant thereupon appealed to the court below and that tribunal, in an opinion by Wilson, P. j., reversed the portion of the' order of the. referee and board which suspended payment of the compensation awarded and entered

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Carr, P. v. First Commonwealth Bank

    2025 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2025

    Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review of Allegheny County, 746 A.2d 581, 583 (Pa. 2000) (allowing an appeal nunc pro tunc due to breakdown in court’s operations where the Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment … See Cook v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mihalik v. Lattimer Coal Corp.

    162 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1948

    The referee, affirmed by the board, found that the claimant was totally disabled as the result ofanthraco-silicosis (miner’s asthma), contracted in the course of. his employment with the defendant employer, and made an award … In an attempt to bring itself within our ruling in Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc., 159 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Joseph Paolino & Sons Inc. v. City of Philadelphia

    429 Pa. Super. 191 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1993

    Western Penn Power Co. v. … Joseph Paolino & Sons, Inc. v. Amalgamated Shipping Corp., E.D.Pa. No. 87-1777, 1989 WL 79743 filed 7/17/89.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Capital City Mutual Fire Ins. v. Boggs

    5 Pa. Super. 394 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1897

    Co. v. … In Eichman v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE, ETC.

    312 Pa. Super. 461 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1983

    In Klein v. … Even if an amendment to the pleadings were allowed however, and this issue was added, our decision would not change in this type of case involving a non-licensee of the Liquor Board. . See Sinn v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • James D. Morrisey, Inc. v. Gross Construction Co.

    297 Pa. Super. 151 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1982

    Abramovich v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, supra; see Dussia v. Barger, 466 Pa. 152 , 351 A.2d 667 (1976); cf. Bole v. … Abramovich v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, supra, 490 Pa. at 295 , 416 A.2d at 477 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Home Financers' Building & Loan Ass'n v. Michael

    117 Pa. Super. 391 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1934

    Michael, they went to live with their daughter, Helen V. Fitzpatrick, for an agreed board of $10 a week each. No payments were ever made on this obligation as Michael continued unemployed and Mrs. … Fitzpatrick for board and lodging aggregated $4,240. “13.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pappas v. Lucas

    181 Pa. Super. 194 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

    Selig v. Phila. Title Ins. Co., 380 Pa. 264 , 111 A. 2d 147 ; Smith-Faris Co. v. Hospital Assn. et al., 313 Pa. 254 , 169 A. 233 . … Young, Admrx. v. Gongaware, 275 Pa. 285 , 119 A. 271 ) and the fact that no specific time for performance is set forth in the writing, is immaterial. The law implied performance within a reasonable time. Schlechter v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.