Case law

Barlock v. Orient Coal & Coke Co.

114 Pa. Super. 228 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1934

It is also conceded that, under the principles announced in Lente v. … Lente v. Luci, supra.

Commonwealth ex rel. Mercer v. Banmiller

193 Pa. Super. 411 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960

Wilson v. Banmiller, supra, p. 532; Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443 (1953). As “due process” is a concept which does not lend itself to precise definition, almost every conceivable contention is made in its name. … O’Niel v. Ashe, 337 Pa. 230 , 10 A. 2d 404 (1940); Commonwealth v. Green, 396 Pa. 137, 143, 144 , 151 A. 2d 241 (1959); Commonwealth v.

Price, R. v. Catanzariti, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2016

In Weigand v. … See § 512(e); see also Renna v.

Emporium Area Joint School Authority v. Anundson Construction & Building Supply Co.

191 Pa. Super. 372 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1959

Seaboard Surety Co. v. Commonwealth, 345 Pa. 147, 151 , 27 A. 2d 27 (1942). … We said in Brobst v. City of Reading, 326 Pa. 627 , 629: “His contract was with the city of Reading, and not with its engineers or Board of public works . . .

Commonwealth v. Bodge

256 Pa. Super. 376 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1978

See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Hubbard, 472 Pa. 259 , 372 A.2d 687 (1977); Commonwealth v. Brown, 250 Pa.Super. 504 , 378 A.2d 1262 (1977); Commonwealth v. Page, 246 Pa.Super. 380 , 371 A.2d 890 (1977); Commonwealth v. … Williams, 229 Pa.Super. 390 , 323 A.2d 862 (1974); Commonwealth v. Brown, 226 Pa.Super. 30 , 312 A.2d 428 (1973).

Hercheck v. Donahoe's Inc.

119 Pa. Super. 501 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1935

These findings are supported by competent evidence and were adopted by the board. The only conflict in the evidence is between certain statements made by the claimant and the testimony of the chef. … Neither of the cases cited and relied upon by the court below—Romesburg v. Gallatin Market et al., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 388 , 174 A. 805 , and Rouleau v. P. *506 Hughes & Son et al., 100 Pa.

Connor v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

50 Pa. Super. 629 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1912

Whilst crossing, he testifies that he continued to watch the car and made a number of signals indicating his desire to have the car stopped so that he could board it. … The situation thus arising is well described by our Brother Orlady in Spahr v. York Railways Company, ante, p. 602. “The motorman had as conspicuous a view of the plaintiff as the latter had of the car.

Commonwealth v. Williamson

2011 Pa. Super. 111 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 2011

Commonwealth v. Brown, 596 Pa. 354 , 943 A.2d 264, 267 (2008); Commonwealth v. Robinson, 575 Pa. 500 , 837 A.2d 1157, 1161 (2003). 4 In Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Hindin v. Samuel, Mayor

158 Pa. Super. 539 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1945

Livingston v. Wolf, 136 Pa. 519 ; Commonwealth v. Harris, 15 Phila. 10 ; Kopf v. Utter, 101 Pa. 27 ; Commonwealth v. Kembel, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 199 .” … Breining v. Allegheny Co., 332 Pa. 474, 479 , 2 A. 2d 842 ; Hopkins v. Catasauqua Mfg. Co., 180 Pa. 199, 201 , 36 A. 735 ; Laubach & Sons v. Easton, 347 Pa. 542, 545 , 32 A. 2d 881 .

Commonwealth v. Deery

46 Pa. Super. 386 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1911

The power to establish quarantine is thus directly conferred upon the board, but the statute itself does not confer such power upon any mere employee of the board, nor does it authorize the board to delegate to its mere subordinates … Court in Com. v.

Lemley v. McClure

122 Pa. Super. 225 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1936

The husband and wife joined in an assignment to Brown, whose status does not appear. … Co. v. Phillips, 69 F. (2d) 901 (CCA 10th, 1934) ; Elmore v. Continental Life Ins. Co. (Kans.), 291 Pac. 755 (1930); Antley v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. (S. C.), 137 S. E. 199 (1927) ; Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Iowa v.

Mannerback v. Pennsylvania Railroad

16 Pa. Super. 622 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1901

Fulton, 31 Pa. 483 ; Hancock v. McAvoy, 151 Pa. 464 . The technical distinction between an exception and a reservation is well marked. … The latter is the creation of a right or interest, which had no prior existence as such, in the thing or part of the thing granted: Kister v. Reeser, 98 Pa. 5 ; Whitaker v. Brown, 46 Pa. 197 ; Moffitt v.

Commonwealth v. Giaccio

202 Pa. Super. 294 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1963

legislature need not set forth with the same particularity the circumstances under which- a jury, under the control of the court, may exercise the power given to it, as it must set forth the area within which a govern: mental board … Serving on that committee as legislators were five present members of tbe judiciary: Judges Lord, Brown, Rahatjser, Readinger, and Woodring. On tbe early law of this Commonwealth on this point see Commonwealth v.

Milavech v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.

180 Pa. Super. 194 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1956

Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 311, 315 , 43 A. 2d 584 . … Anderson v. Sunray Electric, Inc., 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 586 , 98 A. 2d 374 .

Staller v. Staller

144 Pa. Super. 83 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1940

Both the referee and the board made an award of $143 payable by the employer and the Commonwealth. … Paolis v. Tower Hill C. Coke Co., 265 Pa. 291 , 108 A. 638 and Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co., 133 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Conyers

212 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1968

See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Haines, 257 Pa. 289, 297 , 101 Atl. 641 (1917); Commonwealth v. McCloskey, 273 Pa. 456, 462 , 117 Atl. 192 (1922) ; Commonwealth v. Brown, 158 Pa. … In the Brown case, supra, this court stated: “Of course, a trial judge should warn the jury of the corrupt source of an accomplice’s testimony (Com. v.

Vosburg v. Connolly

405 Pa. Super. 121 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1991

Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board, 118 Pa.Cmwlth. 22, 28-29 , 544 A.2d 1078, 1080 (1988). … See Webster v.

Westbrook v. Continental Life Insurance

111 Pa. Super. 563 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1933

The court below found no ambiguity in this language and felt it to be its duty to construe it to mean just what it said, citing Levinton v. Ohio Farmers Ins. Co., 267 *566 Pa. 448, 110 A. 295 ; Urian v. … Courts, however, may not raise a doubt where none exists, or to quote from an English case cited by the appellee, United London & Scottish Insurance Co., Brown’s Claim, 8 Chancery 167, ‘the only duty which the court has to

Rosen v. Seidenberg

111 Pa. Super. 534 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1933

The ‘constitutional right’ invoked by the appellant “to be heard by his counsel” (Com. v. Brown, 309 Pa. *537 515, 164 A. 726 ) is specifically restricted to criminal prosecutions: Sec. 9 of Art.

Commonwealth v. Hamilton

148 Pa. Super. 169 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1941

That is something for the Liquor Control Board. … “The president is the executive agent of the board of directors within the ordinary business of the company:” Kelly, Murray Inc. v. L. B. & T. Co., 299 Pa. 236 , 149 A. 190 .