Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.71s
Nathan Feldman Sons, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
185 Pa. Super. 205 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958
Opinion by Gunther, J., This appeal is from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in tvhich the board allowed unemployment benefits under section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of … We are also of the opinion that the board’s finding cannot be sustained by the evidence. Decision reversed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2024
Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 637 (Pa.Super. 2013) (quoting Lachat v. Hinchcliffe, 769 A.2d 481, 488 (Pa.Super. 2001)). … Moyer v. Leone, 260 A.3d 245, 252 n.6 (Pa.Super. 2021).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNevison v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.
208 Pa. Super. 501 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1966
Whether or not the fall was the cause of claimant’s present disability was a factual question for the Board to determine: McCafferty v. Masten Transportation, Inc., 205 Pa. Superior Ct. 239 , 209 A. 2d 11 . … Pudlosky v. Follmer Trucking Co., 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 450 , 214 A. 2d 270 . The order of the court below is reversed, and the decision of the Board is reinstated.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCommonwealth ex rel. Patterson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
215 Pa. Super. 532 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1969
In discussing the above provision of the Public Defender Act, our Supreme Court, in Commonwealth v. … No machinery or administrative process is provided for such appointment by the Board and we, as well as the Board, are powerless to supply the same.
Cited 5 timesPublished295 A.3d 241 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 2023
-6- J-S01041-23 55 (Pa. 2016); Commonwealth v. Brown, 981 A.2d 893, 900-02 (Pa. 2009). … Brown, 981 A.2d at 902.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2021
WALTER BROWN JR. … Commonwealth v. Sanders, 42 A.3d 325, 331 (Pa. Super. 2012) (quoting Commonwealth v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedYale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
163 Pa. Super. 427 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1948
Upon this crucial point, squarely raised by appellant before the board, there is no finding, and virtually no evidence. One claimant, Marini, sought and obtained a “contract job” during the strike. … The decisions are vacated, and the records are remitted to the board to take further testimony and formulate findings of fact upon the points raised by appellant before the board and this Court.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 2015
BROWN, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. GARY L. … See Payne v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWilkes-Barre Transit Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
215 Pa. Super. 353 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1969
The Bureau refused benefits; the referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review awarded benefits. This appeal followed. The referee found the following pertinent facts which were affirmed by the Board: “5. … The referee and the Board found that under these facts he had good cause for refusing the proffered job.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDepartment of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
207 Pa. Super. 506 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1966
The Referee and the Board found the following facts which are supported by competent evidence and are binding on the reviewing court: “2. … Unlike the situation presented in Warner Company v. U. C.
Cited 9 timesPublishedMessenger Publishing Co. v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment
183 Pa. Super. 407 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957
Board of Property Assessment, 359 Pa. 195, 199 , 58 A. 2d 833 (1948). … Laundry Co. v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedEast Penn Township School District School Board v. Kemmerer
158 Pa. Super. 332 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1945
In Com., to use, v. … See O’Neal v. O’Neal, 4 W. & S. 130, 131 ; Noble’s Administrator v. Laley, 50 Pa. 281, 284 ; Commonwealth v. McCleary, 92 Pa. 188, 191 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2015
BROWN, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. … Dorfman v. Pennsylvania Social Servs. Union B Local 668, 752 A.2d 933, 936 (Pa. Cornrnw, Ct. 2000); See also Stone and Edwards Insurance Agency Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWestinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
187 Pa. Super. 416 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958
Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (No. 2), McCracken Unemployment Compensation Case, supra, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 403 , 144 A. 2d 679 . … Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (No. 2), McCracken Unemployment Compensation Case, supra, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 403 , 144 A. 2d 679 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 2024
Commonwealth v. v. … Commonwealth v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished429 Pa. Super. 234 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1993
Brown Cann and Charles Cann, II. … See, e.g., Schaefer v.
Cited 7 timesPublished138 Pa. Super. 335 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1939
The court below reversed the board in granting an award. This appeal followed. J. V. Taylor, Jr. and Paul Stethers compose a partnership, trading as Taylor and Stethers. … It is not even suggested that there is any other or additional evidence which could be brought to the attention of the board. In such circumstances it was not the duty of the court to remit the record: Easton v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2015
CP-38-CR-2274-2007 v. … CP-38-CR-227 4-2007 v. ANDREW BROWN APPEARANCES: Courtney Hair, Esq. For the Commonwealth Erin Zimmerer, Esq.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKishok Unemployment Compensation Case v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
189 Pa. Super. 527 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959
Opinion by Hirt, J., To state the undisputed facts, reflected in the findings of the Board of Review, is to demonstrate the fallacy in the decision in this case.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2024
[Brown] subsequently filed additional PCRA petitions, and filed [a] petition entitled, “Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief,” on August 31, 2017. Commonwealth v. Brown, 2018 WL 4844708, at *1 (Pa. Super. … Commonwealth v. Busanet, 54 A.3d 35, 45 (Pa. 2012).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna