Case law

Longvue Disposal Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment

172 Pa. Super. 359 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1953

Opinion by Diti-irich, J., This is an appeal by the Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County from the order of the court below directing appellant to transfer property of the Longvue Disposal Corporation … The applicable law is contained in Philadelphia Rural Transit Co. v. Philadelphia, 309 Pa. 84 , 159 A. 861 , where the Supreme Court, speaking through Mr.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

182 Pa. Super. 491 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1956

Opinion by Woodside, J., This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review reversing the *493 referee’s order and allowing benefits to tbe claimant on the ground that the claimant’s unemployment

Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Philadelphia Department of Public Welfare

261 Pa. Super. 583 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1978

Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

194 Pa. Super. 278 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1960

Pennsylvania State Board of Medical Education and Licensure v. Schireson, 360 Pa. 129 , 61 A. 2d 343 . … The decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is reversed and this case remanded to the Board with the direction to make specific findings of fact in accordance with this opinion.

Board of Public Education v. National Union Fire Insurance

709 A.2d 910 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1998

In contrast to Winnacunnet, the court in Durham City Board of Education v. … In Search EDP, Inc. v.

Skytop Lodges, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

188 Pa. Super. 496 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

The bureau sustained his claim; the referee found him ineligible; the board reversed the referee and allowed the claim. The employer appealed. … Pusa Unemployment Compensation Case, supra. *498 The board assumes that the wage of $125 per month, plus room and board, is less than the amount the claimant was receiving for unemployment benefits, when in fact, a reasonable

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Beview

187 Pa. Super. 391 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 315, 321 , 31 A. 2d 740 . … Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 315, 321 , 31 A. 2d 740, 743 .

Com. v. Brown, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2015

Id., quoting Pa. ____________________________________________ 5 Terry v. … Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473, 2483 (2014); United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 235 (1973). As a result, “the propriety of a search depends upon the validity of the arrest.” Commonwealth v.

American Insulator Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

186 Pa. Super. 227 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

See Statutory Construction Act of May 28, *233 1937, P.L. 1019, § 52, 46 PS § 552; Deskins v. West Brownsville Borough, 388 Pa. 547, 550 , 131 A. 2d 101 (1957); Commonwealth v. Gugliotta, 181 Pa. … As there is no other question concerning eligibility before us, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

187 Pa. Super. 425 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

See National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corporation, 356 U. S. 342 , 78 S. Ct. 718 , 2 L. … Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, 383 Pa. 297 , 118 A. 2d 180 .

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

191 Pa. Super. 434 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1959

Further testimony was taken *436 by the referee in accordance with each of the remanding orders of the board. … The findings of the board reflect the testimony which we have reviewed above.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

187 Pa. Super. 252 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

As we said in Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 152 Pa. … Claims were paid before review by the board. See Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. Torquato, 386 Pa. 306 , 125 A. 2d 755 .

General Electric Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

160 Pa. Super. 636 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1947

Opinion by Ross, J., This is an appeal by the employer from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. … However, the board reversed the referee and allowed the claim.

Westingbouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

187 Pa. Super. 403 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board, of Review (No. 1), Accurti Unemployment Compensation Case, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 391 , 144 A. 2d 673 . … Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Hughes Unemployment Compensation Case, supra, 187 Pa.

Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

155 Pa. Super. 177 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1944

Brown [claimant’s witness] testified that the claimant ‘could probably’ do rough painting with the sole vision of the left eye before the accident. This testimony falls below the required standard of proof. Elonis v. … The formula for claimant’s right eye was 20/30. 2 See Quinn v. American Int. Ship Bldg. Corp., 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 304, 306 . 3 Cross-examination of Dr. Brown by Hr. Painter: “Q.

Danville Silk Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

190 Pa. Super. 565 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1959

To this statement the basic error of the board is largely attributable. … The decision of the board is reversed.

Wheatland Tube Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

186 Pa. Super. 224 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

Upon appeal, the Board of Review held that claimant was eligible for benefits and reversed the decision of the referee. The employer then appealed to this Court. … Decision of the Board is reversed.

Buckeye Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

161 Pa. Super. 594 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1947

The referee, affirmed by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, awarded compensation, and the Buckeye Coal Company, intervenor, appealed. … This doctrine of “no contract — no work” Avas firmly established with the United Mine Workers of America, and this is found as a fact by the referee and the board.

State Board of Pharmacy v. General Nutrition Center, Inc.

217 Pa. Super. 725 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1970

Inland Products Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

210 Pa. Super. 716 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1967