Case law

United States ex rel. Brown v. United States Board of Parole

443 F. Supp. 477 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1977

Brown will be suitable for parole, absent *480 new information or institutional misconduct.” … See Zannino v.

Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2024

Petitioner, Timothy Brown, challenges a decision by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole1 to revoke his “street time.” … Brown alleges that his “street time was taken by the parole board” in 2017. (Id. at 5, 13).

Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2024

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY BROWN, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-816 … : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE : BOARD, et al.

Lingua v. United States

801 F. Supp. 2d 320 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2011

See Mitchell v. … (Doc. 30 at 15-16 (citing Brown v.

Abyaneh v. Merchants Bank, North

667 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1986

In support, plaintiffs and Merchants rely on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Brown v. … Plaintiffs reliance upon Brown v.

Soloway v. Weger

389 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1974

While the determination of parole eligibility is wholly within the discretion of the Board of Parole, United States v. … In Morrissey v.

Brown v. Woodring

174 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1959

. * * * ” Koster v. … See Brown v. Hughes, D.C.M. D.Pa.1955, 136 F.Supp. 55 ; Wells v. Simonds Abrasives Co., D.C.E.D.Pa.1951, 102 F.Supp. 519 , Id., 3 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 814 ; Quinn v.

Brown v. Mendez

167 F. Supp. 2d 723 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2001

Brown contends that his sentence is invalid under Apprendi v. … United States v. Brown, 100 F.3d 970 (11th Cir.1996). The Supreme Court denied Brown’s petition for a writ of certiorari on February 18, 1997. 519 U.S. 1140 , 117 S.Ct. 1013 , 136 L.Ed.2d 890 (1997).

Smith v. Brown

17 F.R.D. 39 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1955

Smith, husband and wife, against Stanley Brown. … Sporia v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 3 Cir., 143 F.2d 105 ; Chevassus v. Harley, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 410 . See also Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Brown v. Hannah

850 F. Supp. 2d 471 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2012

v. … The Court therefore rejects Brown’s factual contentions as clearly baseless. See Young v.

Brown v. Smith

580 F. Supp. 1576 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1984

As the Massachusetts defendants noted in their brief, when Brown was transferred he was a party in three civil actions filed in federal district court: Clinkscales v. … Brown and his co-defendants had won a new trial after their initial conviction as a result of errors in the jury charge in the first trial. Commonwealth v.

Brown v. Bernstein

49 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1943

Brown, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, on March 17, 1943, secured in this Court an order upon the defendant requiring him to appear on March 22, 1943, or as soon thereafter as counsel could be heard, and *498 … Brown, has not brought this action in his own right but as an Officer of the Federal Government charged with enforcement of matters of National safety committed to his department, and any injury, loss or damage would be suffered

Brown v. Bernstein

49 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1943

Stephens v. United States, 9 Cir., 261 F. 590 ; Hamm v. United States, 9 Cir., 261 F. 907 ; Bouldin v. United States, 5 Cir., 261 F. 674 ; Weisman v. United States, 7 Cir., 271 F. 944 . … United States v. Lewis, D.C.Mo.1911, 192 F. 633 .

Brown v. Kramer

49 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1943

Brown v. Hughes

136 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1955

James Brown, injured while riding in the Neary car, then by his parent and natural guardian filed the present action against the administratrix, the summons and complaint being served by the United States Marshal by registered … See Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619 , at page 622, 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 . 18 . Cf. Aversa v. Aubry, 1931, 303 Pa. 139 , 154 A. 311 , where such a circumstance was not considered important. 19 .

United States v. Brown

356 F. Supp. 2d 470 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 2005

United States v. Brown, 338 F.Supp.2d 552, 555 (M.D.Pa.2004). … United States v. Brown, at 556 (M.D.Pa.2004). In United States v.

Bartol v. Arbogast

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2022

Cooper v. Lankenau Hosp., 51 A.3d 183, 191 (Pa. 2012) (citing C.C.H. v. … Philadelphia Phillies, Inc., 940 A.2d 336, 340 n.4 (Pa. 2008) (defining “battery” as “‘a harmful or offensive contact’ with the person of another” (quoting Dalrymple v. Brown, 701 A.2d 164, 170 (Pa. 1997))).

Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Brown (In re Brown)

7 B.R. 479 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1980

United States v. Brown

338 F. Supp. 2d 552 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2004

On October 17, 2003, following a jury trial, Defendant Franklin Brown was *555 found guilty on ten counts of a thirty-seven count indictment. … See United States v. Bakhit, 218 F.Supp.2d 1232 (C.D.Cal.2002); United States v. Grabske, 260 F.Supp.2d 866 (N.D.Cal.2002); see also United States v. Snyder, 291 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir.2002).

Brown v. McCarey

33 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1939

Parry v. First National Bank of Lansford, 270 Pa. 556 , 113 A. 847 . … First National Bank v. Farrell, 3 Cir., 272 F. 371 ; Leather Mfg. Nat. Bank v. Morgan, 117 U.S. 96 , 6 S.Ct. 657 , 29 L.Ed. 811 .