Case law

Purcell v. Ewing

560 F. Supp. 2d 337 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 22, 2008

post the candidates running for the board of directors this year. … See Dilworth v.

Unitsd States v. Kehoe

94 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1951

Government’s Exhibit No. 3 was an exemplified copy of the pleadings and the Opinion of the United States Board of Tax Appeals in the case of John Kehoe and Wife, Sarah Kehoe v. … Co. v. Phillips, 1926, 274 U.S. 316 , 47 S.Ct. 600 , 71 L.Ed. 1069 .

Mazur v. Department of Revenue, Com. of Pa.

516 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1981

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Swietlowich v. County of Bucks, 610 F.2d 1157 (3d Cir. 1979). In West v.

Universal Computer Systems, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

479 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 1979

An air carrier is required by 49 U.S.C. § 1373 (a) to file its tariff with the Civil Aeronautics Board. … See, Stevenson v. Economy Bank of Ambridge, 413 Pa. 442 , 197 A.2d 721 (1964); Welded Tube Co. of America v. Phoenix Steel Corp., 512 F.2d 342 (3d Cir. 1975); Cenna v.

Miller v. Hiatt

50 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1943

McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131 , 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L.Ed. 238 . The present petition is, however, in any event without merit. … That the Parole Board may withhold the execution oí a warrant for violation of parole while a parolee is serving another sentence is precisely the issue decided in Zerbst v.

Trently v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2024

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (“the Board”) employed SpDUSM Michael as a parole agent. (Doc. 52, ¶ 1; Doc. 52-1, at 25, ¶¶ 5-8). … Brown v. Gaydos, A.3d, 2023 PA Super 258, *3 (Pa. Super.

Balon v. Enhanced Recovery Co.

190 F. Supp. 3d 385 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2016

.-, 133 S.Ct. 1166 , 1171 n. 1, 185 *388 L,Ed.2d 242 (2013); Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450 , 453 (3d Cir.2006)). … Brown-, 464 F.3d at 454 (quoting Wilson v. Quadramed Corp., 225 F.3d 350, 354 (3d Cir.2000)).

DiLuigi v. Mier

430 F. Supp. 1098 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1977

Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31, 38 (3d Cir. 1974), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 421 U.S. 983 , 95 S.Ct. 1986 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975); see, also, Chung v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). DiLuigi’s “property” must be more than a “unilateral expectation” on his part.

Burton v. Pennsylvania State Police

990 F. Supp. 2d 478 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 2014

The board offered him two options: to remove Lt. … Co. v.

United States v. Ford

58 F.2d 1029 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1932

United States v. Kissel, 218 U. S. 601 , 31 S. Ct. 124, 126 , 54 L. Ed. 1168 ; Brown v. Elliott, 225 U. S. 392 , 32 S. Ct. 812 , 56 L. Ed. 1136 ; McDonnell v. United States (C. C. A. 1) 19 F.(2d) 801 ; Allen v. … Taylor v. United States (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 444 .

Sawicki v. Kipphan

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 2024

Mirabella v. Villard, 853 F.3d 641, 651 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Novoselsky v. … Brown, 822 F.3d 342 (7th Cir. 2016) which held that a government official filing an attorney discipline complaint was not a retaliatory act sufficient to state a claim for First Amendment retaliation)).

Lyons v. Abeil

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2025

Comm'rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)). “To satisfy the pleading standard, [a plaintiff] must identify a custom or policy, and specify what exactly that custom or policy was.” McTernan v. … With respect to Parole Agent Dilitz, Lyons alleges that he “intentionally withheld paperwork from the parole board...to increase [his] stay and not get a favorable decision from the parole board.” (Doc. 1, at 7).

Gonzalez v. Thomas Built Buses, Inc.

934 F. Supp. 2d 747 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2013

Chamberlain v. Giampapa, 210 F.3d 154, 158 (3d Cir.2000) (citing Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 78 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938)). … The employer appealed that decision to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (“WCAB” or “Appeal Board”); The Appeal Board concluded the WCJ had relied on incompetent medical testimony.

Harrisburg Hospital v. Thornburgh

611 F. Supp. 900 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1985

In Pennsylvania v. Rizzo, 530 F.2d 501, 504 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Fire Officers Union v. … In Hoots v.

Gosch v. International Chapter of Horseshoers & Equine Trades, Local 947

200 F. Supp. 3d 484 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 2016

The PLRB noted that the civil courts (not the Board) possessed exclusive jurisdiction to entertain claims for breaches of the duty of fair representation. (Id. at 5). … Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Loose, 402 Pa. 620 , 168 A.2d 323, 325 (1961). And, under the NLRA, a union’s duty of fair representation is implied in § 9(a), 29 U.S.C. § 159 (a). Farber v.

Keck v. Commercial Union Insurance

758 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1991

Brown Transport Corp. v. Commonwealth of Pa., Pa. Hum. Rel. Comm’n, 133 Pa.Com. 545, 578 A.2d 555, 562 (1990). … (citations omitted); This court agrees with the Brown, Cain, and Welcker courts.

New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear & Allied Workers' Union v. Sussex Sportswear, Inc.

591 F. Supp. 1528 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1984

The United States Supreme Court in NLRB v. … The landmark case of United Mine Workers v.

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc.

373 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1974

Menendez v. … See Royal-McBee Corporation v.

In re Wells

140 F. 752 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1905

Rep. 865 , and Braunn v. Keally, 146 Pa. 519 , 23 Atl. 389 , 28 Am. St. Rep. 811 , of the other ; of which Thompson v. Paret and Peek v. … Moss v. Sweet, 16 Q. B. 493; Hunt v. Wyman, 100 Mass. 198 ; Hickman v. Schimp, 109 Pa. 16 ; In re Miller & Brown (D. C.) 135 Fed. 868 .

Donahue v. U.S. Deparment of Labor

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2020

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).