Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

2.36s

  • Alexander Marketing Co. v. Harrisburg Daily Market

    87 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1949

    No. 1 grade on arrival at Harrisburg, they could not have been in suitable shipping condition when they were placed on board the car in Athens, Texas. … Barker-Miller Distributing Co. v. Berman, D.C.W.D.N.Y.1934, 8 F.Supp. 60 . . 7 U.S.C.A. § 499o. . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(i). . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(j).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Ensey

    220 F.R.D. 422 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2004

    Rost v. … Jaffee v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 764 v. Branch Motor Express Co.

    463 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1978

    Milton domiciled common board drivers may operate only in Regions 1 and 2. 10. Drivers assigned to Region 2 enjoy a greater likelihood of returning home every other night than do Region 1 and common board drivers. … E. g., United Steelworkers v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Karno-Smith Co. v. School Dist. of City of Scranton

    44 F. Supp. 860 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1942

    As was said in Pueblo de Taos v. … Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Belback v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.

    40 F.R.D. 16 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1966

    Parla v. Matson Navigation Co., 28 F.R.D. 348, 349 (S.D.N.Y.1961). In McCoy v. … Co., 28 F.R.D. 383 (E.D.Pa.1961); Brown v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co., 17 F.R.D. 324 (S.D.N.Y.1955); Miehle v. United States, 11 F.R.D. 582 (S.D.N.Y.1951); Hayman v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hendrickson

    208 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1962

    Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956). … Bishop v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 (1955), see Note 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Thomas

    686 F. Supp. 1078 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 1988

    In Board of Regents v. … United States v. Brown, 583 F.2d 659, 664 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1217 , 59 L.Ed.2d 456 (1979). See also Otto, 742 F.2d at 108 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. Kennedy Van Saun Mfg. & Eng. Corp.

    12 F.R.D. 523 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 1952

    Kroese v. General Castings Corp., 3 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 760, 763 , 15 A.L.R.2d 1117 . The action of the board of directors is final unless on appeal to equity, fraud or abuse of discretion can be shown. Jones v. … As to (3), defendant will be required to produce and permit the inspection and copying or photographing of defendant’s minute books containing the minutes of all meetings of defendant’s stockholders and defendant’s board

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lahovski v. Rush Township, Pennsylvania

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2020

    (citing Brown v. … Weintraub v. Board of Education, 593 F.3d 196, 203 (2d Cir. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Tussell

    441 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1977

    See Brown v. United States, 411 *1103 U.S. 223, 228-29, 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973) (Burger, C. J., for an unanimous Court). See also United States v. … See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 607 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (Powell, J., concurring); United States v. Galante, 547 F.2d 733, 740 (2d Cir. 1976); United States v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Envirotech Sanitary Systems, Inc. v. Shoener

    745 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1990

    In addition, Plaintiff argues it would be foolhardy to say that its rights are adequately protected by an appeal to the review board, because, they assert, it takes at least three years to get a hearing before that board, … Thus in Edelman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University

    553 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1983

    Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, 452 U.S. 640, 647-48 , 101 S.Ct. 2559, 2564 , 69 L.Ed.2d 298 quoting Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. at 771 , 96 S.Ct. at 1830 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Butler v. U.S. Parole Commission

    570 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1983

    Maslauskas v. U.S. Board of Parole, 639 F.2d 935, 939 (3d Cir.1980). Cf. Kenner v. Martin, 648 F.2d 1080 (6th Cir.1981). The lodging of a detainer does not amount to “execution” of the warrant. … See, e.g., Franklin v. Fenton, 642 F.2d 760, 764 (3d Cir.1980); Maslauskas v. U.S. Board of Parole, 639 *74 F.2d at 938. As will be seen below, he cannot demonstrate such prejudice.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gutstein v. McDermott

    554 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1983

    Davis v Mann, 371 US 678, 690, 12 L ed 2d 609, 616, 84 S Ct [1441, 1447]; McNeese v Board of Education, 373 US 668, 673-74 , 10 L ed 2d 622, 626, 83 S Ct 1433 [1436-1437]; Chicago v Atchison, T. & S.F.R. … majority of the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Becker v. Evans

    496 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1980

    Atlantic Coast Line R.R. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 398 U.S. 281, 287 , 90 S.Ct. 1739, 1743 , 26 L.Ed.2d 234 (1970). … Jennings v. Boenning & Company, 482 F.2d 1128 (3rd Cir.1973); In re Glenn W. Turner Enterprises Litigation, 521 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1975).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Standard Motor Freight, Inc.

    260 F. Supp. 269 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1966

    In John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. … In Radio Corp. of America v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pievsky v. Ridge

    921 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1996

    In Petty v. … Plaintiff is a member or Commissioner of the DRPA Board. The Board is "in charge of [the DRPA's] property and affairs.” Id. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hoberman v. Lock Haven Hospital

    377 F. Supp. 1178 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1974

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … In Berberian v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Staiano v. Schwab (In Re Maloney)

    249 B.R. 71 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2000

    After Shortz v. Farrell, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court further defined the parameters of the practice of law in Dauphin County Bar Ass’n v. Mazzacaro, 465 Pa. 545 , 351 A.2d 229 (1975). … In State Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Shawn Luke Randolph v. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2026

    MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAWN LUKE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:26-cv-00215 v. … THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al.,

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.