Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

1.90s

  • Clemochefsky v. Celebrezze

    222 F. Supp. 73 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 1963

    Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia Enameling & Stamping Company, 306 U.S. 292 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660 (1939); Universal Camera Corporation v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Staley v. United States

    306 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1969

    Mendiola v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 401 F.2d 695 ; Kington v. United States, 6 Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 9 . … Brown v. United States, 9 Cir. 1965, 353 F.2d 578 ; Quinton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1962, 304 F.2d 234 ; cf. Mendiola v. United States, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Rollnick

    33 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1940

    Miller v. Aderhold, supra [ 288 U.S. 206, 210 , 53 S.Ct. 325 , 77 L.Ed. 702 ]; Wagner v. United States, supra [9 Cir., 3 F.2d 864 ] ; Manke v. … The petitioner, however, contends that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Parole to receive his application and in this manner to fix the term of his sentences. In the case of McNally v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Capobianco v. First National Bank

    380 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1974

    The Court recognizes that the purpose of the by-law section is to apprise the management of the strength and voting intention of a challenging faction, McKee and Co. v. … In a comprehensive opinion, Judge Weinstein in the case of Cupo v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DiAntonio v. Pennsylvania State University

    455 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1978

    On September 9, 1977 Plaintiff, Gus DiAntonio, filed a complaint against Defendants, the Pennsylvania State University, the Board of Trustees of the Pennsylvania State University, and John W. … See, Mahone v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Berkoski v. Ashland Regional Medical Center

    951 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1997

    Ford, 81 F.3d at 310 ; see also Brown v. Crowe, 963 F.2d 895, 898 (6th Cir.1992); McConnell v. General Tel. … Ford, 81 F.3d at 312 (emphasis added); see also Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Wood

    140 F. 964 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1905

    The goods were billed to the bankrupt as though it was a sale, and, while this is not conclusive (Dows v. National Exchange Bank, 91 U. S. 618 , 23 L. Ed. 214 ; Sturm v. Boker, 150 U. S. 312 , 14 Sup. Ct. 99, 37 L. … Ed. 1093 ), it is of more or less persuasive force (Chapman v. Kerr, 80 Mo. 158 ; In re Miller & Brown [D. C.] 135 Fed. 868 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • MCCULLOUGH v. WOOLF

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2022

    The only named Defendant is Scott Woolf, the acting Board Secretary for the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. Id. … Owens v. Ortiz, No. 05-2351, 2005 WL 1199066, at *3 (D.N.J. May 19, 2005); see also Mosch v. Brown, No. 06-4067, 2006 WL 2711637, at *3-4(D.N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pennsylvania v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

    948 F. Supp. 2d 416 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2013

    Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. … In NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 94 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984), the Supreme Court distinguished between "most of the regulatory controls of the NCAA ...

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United Furniture Workers of America v. Mohawk Flush Door Corp.

    212 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1963

    In United Steelworkers of America v. … In United Steelworkers of America v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120

    504 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1980

    See Aldinger v. Howard, 427 U.S. at 18 , 96 S.Ct. at 2422 ; Haddon Township Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education, 476 F.Supp. at 687 . … The fact that the ultimate legal questions before the court and the Board may not be identical is not alone dispositive.

    Modified by Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild Of Wilkes-Barre, 647 F.2d 372 (1981)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Berckeley Investment Group, Ltd. v. Colkitt

    984 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1997

    North Central F.S., Inc. v. Brown, 951 F.Supp. 1383, 1400 (N.D.Iowa 1996)(quoting Westmoreland Capital Corp. v. Findlay, 100 F.3d 263, 269 (2d Cir.1996)). … After a final draft of this order was prepared, the court became aware of Spectacor Management Group v. Brown, 131 F.3d 120 (3d Cir. 1997). Unfortunately, an advance copy of this opinion was not delivered to the court.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clover Farms Dairy v. Brumbaugh

    80 A.L.R. Fed. 899 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1984

    See Old Colony Trust Company v. Penrose Industries Corp., 387 F.2d 939 (3d Cir.1967) ce rt. denied 392 U.S. 927 , 88 S.Ct. 2283 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968). … See City of Pittsburgh v. Milk Marketing Board, 7 Pa.Commw.Ct. 180, 190-91 , 299 A.2d 197 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Connor v. BROTH. OF RY., AIRLINE & SS CLERKS

    496 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1980

    Warner, Plaintiffs, v. … As the Supreme Court has stated, "Congress considered it essential to keep these so-called `minor' disputes within the Adjustment Board and out of the courts." Union Pacific Railroad Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McMillan v. Parker

    254 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 1966

    On November 23, 1965, the United States Board of Parole, upon information that petitioner had violated the conditions of release, issued a warrant for his arrest, which writ was executed on Decernber 6, 1965. … Miller v. Taylor, 313 F.2d 21, 22 (10 Cir. 1962). Although a prisoner js mandatorily released, he is still subject to the original sentence.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nittany Outdoor Advertising, LLC v. College Township

    22 F. Supp. 3d 392 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 2014

    Stat. § 10910.2, which sets forth the findings that shall be made by a zoning hearing board before granting a variance. 22 *416 Yet even assuming that § 10910.2 guides the Township’s Zoning Hearing Board, the Board’s discretion … Lamar Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Woodward

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2025

    . ¶¶ 18-19, 22, 37-44, Woodward v. Brown, No. 0392-CV-2024 (Pa. Ct. C.P. Tioga Cnty. … Brown’s liability to Mr. Woodward for Christine’s death— 73 See Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. George V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lindenmuth

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2026

    See Natale v. … v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 417-18 (1997)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wilkes Barre Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union, No. 137 v. Great Northern Press

    522 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1981

    Glomac Plastics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 592 F.2d 94, 97-98 (2d Cir. 1979). … See Lewis v. Lowry, 322 F.2d 453, 456 (4th Cir. 1963) (en banc). 8 . See also National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Harrisburg Area Community College v. Pacific Employers Insurance

    682 F. Supp. 805 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1988

    Second, relying upon Metal Bank of America, Inc. v. … The court then cited Colonial Gas Energy System v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.