Case law

Keyser v. Commonwealth National Financial Corp.

644 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1986

See e.g., Rodman v. … See Gearhart v.

In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation

641 F. Supp. 2d 367 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2009

Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516, 518 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 (1923) (concluding that no jurisdiction existed over a defendant that frequently entered the forum merely to purchase goods); Noonan v. … In fact, Chambers could not recall how many individuals comprise Cad-bury USA’s board, could not identify a single board member, and could not remember attending any board meetings in person. 54 In contrast, he recollected

Adams v. Pennsylvania Chiropractic Society

563 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1983

See Eatough v. Albano, 673 F.2d 671, 676 (3d Cir. 1982); Davis v. Board of Medical Examiners, 497 F.Supp. 525, 528 (D.N.J.1980). … Smith v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, No. 485 C.D. 1981 (Mar. 27, 1981); Mittica v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, No. 2446 C.D. 1981 (Oct. 15, 1981); Zivanovitch v.

Felker v. Christine

796 F. Supp. 135 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1992

See Brown, 675 F.Supp. at 290 . … Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345, 1353 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd sub nom. Kush v. Rutledge, 460 U.S. 719 [ 103 S.Ct. 1483 , 75 L.Ed.2d 413 ] (1983).

In re Foster Paint & Varnish Co.

210 F. 652 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1914

Dana v. Bank of the United States, 5 Watts & S. (Pa.) 223; Ardesco Oil Co. v. North American Oil & Mining Co., 66 Pa. 375 . As was said by Judge Willard in Matter of Kenwood Ice Co. (D. C.) 26 Am. Bankr. … Rep. 499, 189 Fed. 525 : “A board of directors ought to have power to put the company into bankruptcy. They have care of the general business of the corporation.

Gregory v. New York Parole Commission

496 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1980

Walker v. King, 448 F.Supp. 580 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Redding v. Vermillion, 416 F.Supp. 1181 (W.D.Mo.1976); Sitarski v. New York, 358 F.Supp. 817 (W.D.N.Y.1973). … The Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Petitioner has cited Pavia v. Hogan, 386 F.Supp. 1379 (N.D.Ga.1974), a case with facts similar to his own.

In re Miller & Brown (2)

135 F. 871 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1905

Brown after they had been received. … Hunt v. Wyman, 100 Mass. 198 ; Hickman v. Shimp, 109 Pa. 16 ; Reber v. Schitler, 141 Pa. 640 , 21 Atl. 736 . The bankrupts did not buy, in other words, with the right to return such part as they concluded not to retain.

Capobianco v. First National Bank

372 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1974

This Court has discussed the standards governing the issuance of a preliminary injunction in Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 353 F.Supp. 542 (M.D.Pa.1973). … Pictures v. Gittone, 110 F.2d 292, 293 (3d Cir. 1940). Plaintiffs herein seek to alter- the status quo, not to preserve it.

Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security

83 F. Supp. 3d 625 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2015

. § 636 (b)(1); Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir.2011). … Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir.1988); Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Sec., 529 F.3d 198, 200 (3d Cir.2008).

American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University

464 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1979

In Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … National Market Reports, Inc., v. Brown, 443 F.Supp. 1301, 1304 (S.D.W.Va.1978) (3-judge court).

Watkins v. Hudson Coal Co.

54 F. Supp. 953 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1944

Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Company, supra. … Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., supra.

Mitchell v. Department of Corrections

272 F. Supp. 2d 464 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2003

In Heck v. … Plaintiff asserts that his appeal was based on Rivenbark v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 509 Pa. 248 , 501 A.2d 1110 (1985).

Harper v. National Flood Insurers Ass'n

494 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1980

Taylor, 266 U.S. 200 [ 45 S.Ct. 47 , 69 L.Ed. 247 ]; Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co., 317 U.S. 239, 245 [ 63 S.Ct. 246, 250 , 87 L.Ed. 239 ]; Brown v. … Muniz v. Hoffman, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, 422 U.S. 454,468 , 95 S.Ct. 2178,2186 , 45 L.Ed.2d 319 (1975).

Heffner v. Murphy

590 F. Supp. 2d 710 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2008

LLC v. … Therefore, Plaintiffs assert that "unless you are ‘anointed’ by PFDA to serve on the Board, you will not ... serve on the Board.” (Id.). 15 . Additionally, three years ago in Walker v.

Banks v. Horn

928 F. Supp. 512 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1996

Commonwealth v. … Brown Issue The final unexhausted claim raised by Banks relates to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown .

United States ex rel. Addonizio v. Arnold

423 F. Supp. 189 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1976

The factors upon which either the Board or the Bureau could have acted are found in United States v. … Thompson v. Levy, Et Al., Civil No. 75-1478 (M.D.Pa., February 28, 1976). . The Notice of Action provides the following reasons for the Board’s denial of Addonizio’s parole application.

Sweeney v. St. Joseph's Hospital

769 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1991

In Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. … Faced with disruption of services to over 3,600 clients, the board of Northeast reluctantly agreed. Subsequently, the entire board resigned. A new board was appoint ed by St. Joseph’s Hospital and the St.

High River Ltd. Partnership v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.

383 F. Supp. 2d 660 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2005

The latest salvo in the litigation is a motion to dismiss, filed by Mylan and the members of its board (“Mylan Board”). … See, e.g., Davis v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 451 F.2d 659 , *666 662 (3d Cir.1971); Cole v. Ford Motor Co., 566 F.Supp. 558, 568-69 (W.D.Pa.1983); Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Adver.

Scarnati v. Washington

599 F. Supp. 1554 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1985

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 572 , 92 S.Ct. at 2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 557 . … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 573 n. 12, 92 S.Ct. at 2707 n. 12. The accusations, however, must be publicized. See Bollow v.

Marshall v. Hiatt

73 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1947

You were given a hearing by the-Parole Board; is that right? A. Yes sir.” Bowers v. Dishong, 5 Cir., 1939, 103. F.2d 464 (and cases there cited); Rogoway v. Warden, 9 Cir., 1941, 122 F.2d 967 ; United States ex rel. … Supp. 420 ; Mills v. Hiatt, D.C.M.D.Pa., 1943, 50 F.Supp. 689 ; Walton v. Hiatt, D.C.M.D.Pa., 1943, 50 F.Supp. 690 ; Phipps v. Pescor, D.C.Mo.1946, 68 F. Supp. 242 .