Case law

NBT Bank v. First National Community Bank

287 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2003

Nat’l Bank v. … In Brown v. Lee County Bank, 501 So.2d 702 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1987), the court does not even mention the possible applicability of federal reserve regulations to the alleged mislabeling of an envelope. 9 .

Ready v. United States Parole Commission

483 F. Supp. 1273 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1980

Drayton v. McCall, 584 F.2d 1208, 1218 (2d Cir. 1978); Christopher v. United States Board of Parole, 589 F.2d 924, 929-30 (7th Cir. 1978); see Mathews v. … Christopher v. United States Board of Parole, 589 F.2d 924, 930-31 (7th Cir. 1978).

Thorn v. County of Monroe

586 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1984

” Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 , 102 S.Ct. 2764 , 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982) quoting Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 2744 , 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); Jackson v. … Defendants Kitchen, Heller, Ruddy, Kaufman, Shukaitis, Joyce and Pierson constitute the Board of Directors of Pleasant Valley (the Board). 6 The Board is responsible for the formulation of policy for Pleasant Valley.

Mann v. Palmerton Area School District

33 F. Supp. 3d 530 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2014

directors Michael Ballard, Carl Bieling, Susan Debski, Carol Dwyer, Stuart , Henritzy, Charles Myers, Barry Scherer, Christina Snyder, and Darlene Yeakel (collectively “board members”). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).

Bracey v. Hill

11 F. Supp. 148 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1935

United States v. Solomon (C. C. A.) 70 F.(2d) 834 ; Eyler v. Aderhold (C. C. A.) 73 F.(2d) 372 . … Such a sentence was held valid in the case of Rosso v.

McGinley

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 2026

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JASPER WASHINGTON, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-cv-01146 v. … of Probation and Parole (the “Board”).

Meyers v. Alldredge

348 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1972

Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 , 940 (3rd Cir. 1969). It is only when solitary confinement becomes “so foul, so inhuman and so violative of basic concepts of decency”, Wright v. … See Sostre v. McGinnis, supra; Nolan v. Scafati, supra; Landman v. Royster, supra; Clutchette v. Procunier, supra.

Barry v. Luzerne County

447 F. Supp. 2d 438 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2006

Id. at 1958 (citing Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will County, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 )). … Watters v. City of Philadelphia, 55 F.3d 886, 891-92 (3d Cir.1995) (quoting Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968)).

Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Penn Forest Township

42 F. Supp. 2d 493 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1999

See Virginia Metronet, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of James City County, 984 F.Supp. 966, 973 (E.D.Va.1998). … In Wright v.

United States v. Barna

442 F. Supp. 1232 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1978

Anderson v. United States, 262 F.2d 764 (8th Cir. 1959); United States v. Frumento, 405 F.Supp. 23 (E.D.Pa.1975); United States v. Quinn, 364 F.Supp. 432 (N.D.Ga.1973); United States v. … Although Defendants contend that there has been inadequate proof of their membership on the board, they offered nothing at trial to rebut testimony that they attended Board meetings and participated in the award of the contract

Brace v. County of Luzerne

873 F. Supp. 2d 616 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2012

(the “Retirement Board”), Maryanne C. … Thus, the Commonwealth Court instructed the Board to follow the hearing and appeal proceedings in accordance with due process. See id. Similarly, in Cherillo v. Ret.

Wolfe v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance

877 F. Supp. 2d 228 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 2012

The Pennsylvania Superior Court held in Brown v. … Haugh v. Allstate Ins. Co., 322 F.3d 227, 239 (3d Cir.2003) (emphasis added) (citing Brown, 708 A.2d at 110 ).

PENNSYLVANIA PUB. INT. RES. GROUP, INC. v. PH Glatfelter Co.

128 F. Supp. 2d 747 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2001

Defendant manufactures paper using a bleached kraft process in order to remove the brown color from the wood fiber contained in the paper. … . ___, 121 S.Ct. 46 , 148 L.Ed.2d 16 (2000), the Virginia State Water Quality Board (the "Board") and the defendants had entered into an agreement that predated its final NPDES permit. Id. at 521.

In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation

999 F. Supp. 2d 777 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 2014

V. … Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 227 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993) (citing 2 Areeda & Turner, Antitrust Law 404 (1978)).

Badgett Mine Stripping Corp. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

173 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 1959

In Somerset Borough v. … In Ruch v.

INSURANCE BD. UNDER SOCIAL INS. PLAN v. Muir

635 F. Supp. 1425 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1986

They seek to have us reverse our memorandum and order of February 28, 1986, Insurance Board v. Muir, 628 F.Supp. 1537 (M.D.Pa.1986). … The language of the court in Board of Trustees of the Montana Teamsters Employers v.

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Delaware Riverkeeper Network

921 F. Supp. 2d 381 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 2013

Einsig v. Pennsylvania Mines Corp., 69 Pa. Cmwlth. 351, 452 A.2d 558, 568-69 (1982). The Board simply could not wait for the passage of regulations in this instance. … See McCarthy v.

Rothstein v. Hiatt

68 F. Supp. 738 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1946

McNally v. Hill, 1934, 293 U.S. 131 , 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L.Ed. 238 ; Walton v. Hiatt, D.C.Pa., 1943, 50 F.Supp. 690 . … Hauck v. Hiatt, D.C.Pa., 1943, 50 F.Supp. 917 , affirmed 3 Cir., 141 F.2d 812 ; Bass v. Hiatt, D.C.Pa., 1943, 50 F.Supp. 420 . The application for the writ of habeas corpus is accordingly denied.

Willis v. Dillsburg Grain & Milling Co.

490 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1980

Braden v. University of Pittsburgh, 552 F.2d 948, 955 (3rd Cir. 1977). … From the board’s acquiescence to the present procedure, it can be inferred that the board of directors “deems” the present procedure “advisable”.

Cicchiello

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 1, 2026

Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 245 (3d Cir. 2013). … See Umbenhauer v. Woog, 969 F.2d 25, 30 (3d Cir. 1992) (citations omitted).