Case law

Andrews v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2020

Virsnieks v. Smith, 521 F.3d 707, 718 (3d Cir. 2008). … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003).

Rhines v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 27, 2020

To properly exhaust a claim involving a determination by the Parole Board, the petitioner must first seek administrative review with the Parole Board within thirty days of the mailing date of the Board’s decision. … Pagan v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. and Parole, 2009 WL 210488 *3 (E.D. Pa. January 22, 2009); see also Brown v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. and Parole, 2010 WL 2991166 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2010).

REZNICKCHECK v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2019

Therein, Petitioner alleges that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole violated his constitutional rights by “illegally” detaining him. (/d. at p. 1). … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003).

Rode v. Dellarciprete

617 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1985

It is well settled that a state and its agencies are not “persons” under §§ 1983 and 1985. 2 Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 , 99 S.Ct. 1139 , 59 L.Ed.2d 358 (1979). Thompson v. … An-Ti Chai v. Michigan Technological University, 493 F.Supp. 1137 (W.D.Mich.1980); Thompson v. State of New York, 487 F.Supp. 212 (N.D.N.Y.1979). 3 .

Boykin v. SIENA HOUSE GAUDENZIA PROGRAM

464 F. Supp. 2d 416 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2006

Ray v. Kertes, 285 F.3d 287 (3d Cir.2002). As such, the failure to exhaust available administrative remedies must be pleaded and proven by the Defendants. Brown v. Croak, 312 F.3d 109, 111 (3d Cir.2002). … See McMahon v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 504 Pa. 240 , 470 A.2d 1337 (1983); Evans v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr., 713 A.2d 741 (Pa.Commw.1998); St. Clair v.

Brown

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2025

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAQUEZ DAVON BROWN, : Civil No. 1:24-CV-00173 … Boomer v. Lewis, No. 3:06-CV-00850, 2009 WL 2900778, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 9, 2009).

DeVyver v. Warden, US Penitentiary

388 F. Supp. 1213 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1974

Wiley v. United States Board of Parole, 380 F.Supp. at 1197 . As stated by the court in Battle v. … Wiley v. United States Board of Parole, 380 F.Supp. at 1197 .

United States v. Mikolaitis

682 F. Supp. 798 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1988

In United States v. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. [281] at 302, 99 S.Ct. [1705] at 1718 [ 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979)].

Hunter v. Carbondale Area School District

829 F. Supp. 714 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1993

Id. at 1374 See also Cornelius v. Town of Highland Lake, 880 F.2d 348 (11th Cir.1989); Wood v. Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583 (9th Cir.1989); and Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097 (3d Cir. 1990). … D.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational-Technical School, at 1375 (quoting Brown v.

United States v. Gilboy

162 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 1958

Askounes’ Liquor License Case, 1941, 144 Pa.Super. 293 , at page 298, 19 A.2d 846 ; Baskin v. Brown, 4 Cir., 1949, 174 F.2d 391 , at page 394, and see United States v. … Beason, 1890, 133 U.S. 333 , at page 342, 10 S.Ct. 299 , 33 L.Ed. 637 ; Bridges v. State of California, 1941, 314 U.S. 252 , at pages 264, 265, 62 S.Ct. 190 , 86 L.Ed. 192 ; West Virginia State Board of Education v.

Healthamerica Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Susquehanna Health System

278 F. Supp. 2d 423 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2003

U.S. v. Brown Univ. in Providence in State of Rhode Island, 5 F.3d 658 , 670 (3d Cir.1993). The Supreme Court has consistently held price fixing illegal per se under Section 1. See id.; Citizen Pub. Co. v. … See Brown, 5 F.3d at 670; Barry v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 555 F.2d 3, 7 (1st Cir.1977).

United States v. Gilboy

160 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1958

. § 3237 ; Brown v. Elliott, 1912, 225 U.S. 392 , 32 S.Ct. 812 , 56 L.Ed. 1136 ; Hyde v. United States, supra, 225 U.S. 347 , 32 S.Ct. 793 , 56 L.Ed. 1114 . … United States v. Murdock, 1931, 284 U.S. 141, 148 , 52 S.Ct. 63, 64 , 76 L.Ed. 210 .” Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367 , at page 371, 71 S.Ct. 438, 440 , 95 L.Ed. 344 ; Brown v.

Zweifach v. SCRANTON LACE COMPANY

156 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1957

J., in Brown v. … The Act of 1933, § 2852-401, provides: “The business and affairs of every business corporation shall be managed by a * * * board of * * * directors * * * ”; and see By-Laws, Article IV, § 1. See Severance v.

United States v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources

778 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1991

See Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal Service, 467 U.S. 512, 521 , 104 S.Ct. 2549, 2554 , 81 L.Ed.2d 446, 454 (1984). A. … Indirect support is provided by Romero-Barcelo v. Brown, 643 F.2d 835 (1st Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds sub nom., Weinberger v.

Plaisted v. Geisinger Medical Center

210 F.R.D. 527 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2002

Given that, we adopt the guidelines for attorney behavior at depositions announced in Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D.Pa.1993). … See, e.g., O’Brien v. Amtrak, 163 F.R.D. 232, 236 (E.D.Pa.1995) (indicating a willingness to use the Hall guidelines).

Scanlin v. Utica First Insurance

426 F. Supp. 2d 243 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2006

Brown entered into an agreement pursuant to which: (1) judgment in the amount of $350,000 was entered against Mr. Brown; (2) Mr. Brown assigned to Plaintiff any claims that Mr. … In Naylor v.

West v. Williamsport Area Community College

492 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 1980

Healthy School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Unified School District No. 480 v. Epperson, 583 F.2d at 1122 ; Hander v. … See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d at 493-94 .

Herman v. County of York

482 F. Supp. 2d 554 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2007

Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir.1990) (citing Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 322-23 , 102 S.Ct. 2452 , 73 L.Ed.2d 28 (1982)). … Brown v. Chambersburg, 903 F.2d at 278 . The only decision for which Plaintiff could fault Nurses Windon and Krzy-wulak was failing to place Herman on suicide watch.

Alba v. Housing Authority of City of Pittston

400 F. Supp. 2d 685 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2005

Browning-Ferris, 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir.1982), PHA and Pittston City were neither a single employer nor a joint employer. (Doc. 42, pp. 4-5). … Apr.2, 1997) (holding that “to the extent [plaintiffs] constitutional claims arise out of the alleged [age] discrimination against plaintiff, those claims are barred by ... the ADEA”) (citing Brown v.

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District

229 F.R.D. 463 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2005

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area Sch. Dist, 04-CV-2688, 2005 WL 578974 (M.D.Pa.2005); see also Brody v. Spang, 957 F.2d 1108, 1115 (3d Cir.1992); Harris v. … See Pennsylvania State Univ. v. U.S.