Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,649 results
2.47s
Doe v. Riverside School District
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 2023
The School Board will be Dismissed as a Defendant. … The School Board will be DISMISSED as a defendant; 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2019
Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 662 (3d Cir. 2019). … Brown, supra. 3 The Court notes that this issue was overlook by the Court, not Plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesUnknown454 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1978
Hodges v. Klein, 562 F.2d 276 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam); Kelly v. Brewer, 525 F.2d 394 (8th Cir. 1975); Mayberry v. Robinson, 427 F.Supp. 297, 309 (M.D.Pa.1977) (Muir, J.); United States ex rel. Bennett v. … See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 538 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1976) (en banc) (unanimous), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 979 , 97 S.Ct. 490 , 50 L.Ed.2d 588 (1976).
Cited 3 timesPublishedVerney v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
903 F. Supp. 826 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1995
Rosser v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 561 (1972).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2025
When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown41 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1941
Also, bonds given as payment for notes of the corporation were held to be valid in Wrightsville Hardware Co. v. McElroy, 254 Pa. 422 , 98 A. 1052 . And in Rahway National Bank v. … The bonds were pledged as collateral pursuant to a resolution of the board of directors. There was no evidence of any trick, artifice, fraud or abuse of discretion on the part of the directors.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSaracinaj v. Nationwide Insurance Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2022
Brown v. Jevic, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009). “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, with all doubts to be resolved in favor of remand.” /d. (citing Batoff v. State Farm Ins. … Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, 906 A.2d 571 (Pa. Super.
Cited 0 timesUnknownYoung v. Sunbury Police Department
160 F. Supp. 3d 802 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 2016
He further argues that the Third Circuit held, in Ridgewood Board of Education v. … State Board of Law Exam’rs, 156 F.3d 321 , 331 (2d Cir.1998) rev’d on other grounds, 527 U.S. 1031 , 119 S.Ct. 2388 , 144 L.Ed.2d 790 (1999); Powers v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2022
v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 284-85 (2002). … long-term respiratory problems, as well as mental and emotional injuries.7 He named as defendants three DOC officials: John Wetzel (then-Secretary of Corrections), Kevin Ransom (Superintendent of SCI Dallas), and Erin Brown
Cited 0 timesUnknownSmith v. Mid-Valley School District
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2019
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997); see also Bell v. City of Philadelphia, 629 F. App’x 214, 216 (3d Cir. 2015). … See A.B. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown743 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2010
Brown v. Trench, 787 F.2d 167, 169 (3d Cir.1986) (citations omitted). … See Berg v. County of Allegheny, 219 F.3d 261, 276 (3d Cir.2000) (per curiam) (citing Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 408-09 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedS.M. v. Tamaqua Area School District
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2023
with” the individual school board defendants. (Id. ¶ 155.) The complaint further alleges that the school board defendants presided over three disciplinary hearings and one special meeting. … Yan v. Penn State Univ., 529 Fed. App’x 167, 171 (3d Cir. 2013) (citing Papelino v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 2020
See Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726 (M.D. Pa. 2001); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Litterio v. … New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) claim that is barred by the procedural limitations imposed by the AEDPA); Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726-27 (M.D. Pa. 2001).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHE Group, Inc. v. Borough of Middletown
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2021
The plaintiff appealed to the township’s zoning hearing board, but the board continued the hearing on her appeal indefinitely. Id. … to the Zoning Hearing Board.
Cited 0 timesUnknown809 F. Supp. 1185 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992
At times, convicted *1189 inmates allegedly boarded with detainees in the fishtank. The fishtank itself had no toilet or sink, no tables or chairs, no drinking fountain and no television. … Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 345 , 106 S.Ct. 1092, 1098 , 89 L.Ed.2d 271 (1986); Schrob v. Catterson, 948 F.2d 1402, 1421 (3d Cir.1991); Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1109 (3d Cir.1991).
Cited 216 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 2024
Bd. of County Comm'rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). This custom must be “so widespread as to have the force of law.” Brown, 520 U.S. at 404; see also Beck v. … See Brown v. Erie Cty., No. 20-251, 2022 WL 900308, at *1 (W.D. Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWard Baking Co. v. Hazleton Baking Co.
292 F. 202 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1923
Celluloid Co. v. Amer. Zylonite Co. (C. C.) 35 Fed. 301 . … Andrews v. Cross (C. C.) 8 Fed. 269 ; Eames v. Andrews, 122 U. S. 40 , 7 Sup. Ct. 1073, 30 L. Ed. 1064 ; Dixon-Woods Co. v. Pfeifer, 55 Fed. 390 , 5 C. C. A. 148 ; Cleveland Foundry Co v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedZaloga v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of America
671 F. Supp. 2d 623 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 2009
Zaloga’s own occupation is that of board certified nephrologist. On June 17, 2002, Dr. … By July 13, 2004, Zaloga’s injuries had progressively worsened to the point that he was determined to be incapacitated and unable to work as a board certified nephrologist.
Cited 51 timesPublishedClary v. Pennsylvania State University
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2025
See id. at 204–05 & n.11; Brown v. Rite Aid Corp., 415 F. Supp. 3d 588, 594 (E.D. Pa. 2019). … Klay v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown678 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1988
Michelson v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., 808 F.2d 1005 (3d Cir.1987) citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2512 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). … See Shupp v. Brown, 293 Pa.Super. 412 , 439 A.2d 178 , (1981); Sendick v. Matvey, 391 Pa. 286 , 138 A.2d 92 , (1957); Thomas v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna