Case law

Major v. Garman

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2021

Richards v. Pa. Bd. of Probation and Parole, 423 F.3d 282, 285 (3d Cir. 2005). … But this is exactly the sort of decision that is committed to the parole board’s complete discretion. See id.; Coady v.

United States v. Wilmington

240 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2002

Kerns v. Cholfont-New Britain Twp. Joint Sewage Authority, 263 F.3d 61, 65 (3d Cir.2001). Any evidence discovered during a validly consented to search may be seized and admitted at trial. United States v. … Paret and Schwartz boarded the bus. Schwartz proceeded to the back of the bus to check the bathroom for contraband. Paret addresséd the passengers on the public address system.

Mutschler v. Haiainsworth

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2024

Board of Prob. & Parole, No. 474 MD 2021 (Pa. Commw. Ct. … Vaughn, 296 F.3d 138, 146 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 844-45 (1999)); see also Johnson v.

Edelweiss Development Corp. v. County of Susquehanna

738 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1988

Document # 30 at 5 citing Patsy v. Board of Regents of State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).

Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Saccone

894 F. Supp. 2d 573 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2012

The Board passed a resolution accusing the Vatican of *581 meddling in governmental affairs. … See Newdow v.

In-Cho Chung v. Park

377 F. Supp. 524 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 1974

Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College et al., 501 F.2d 31 (3d Cir. 1974). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). The College dismissed Dr.

Sheeran v. Ravella

18 F.R.D. 411 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1956

Stewart v. … See and cf. our opinion in Brown v. Hughes, D.C., 136 F. Supp. 55 , and cf. International Plastic Harmonica Corp. v. Harmonic Reed Corp., supra, 69 F.Supp. at page 516 ; Morse-Koob, Inc., v.

Taylor v. Cent. Pa. Drug & Alcohol Serv. Corp.

890 F. Supp. 360 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1995

Id., citing Brown v. A.J. Gerrard Manufacturing Co., 715 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir.1983) (en banc) (per curiam). … Brown Transport Corporation v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 133 Pa.Cmwlth. 545 , 578 A.2d 555, 562 (1990) and Consumers Motor Mart v.

Holocheck v. Luzerne County Head Start, Inc.

385 F. Supp. 2d 491 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2005

Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 796 (3d Cir.2001). “The issue is not whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail but whether the claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claims.” Maio v. … Brown v. Trench, 787 F.2d 167, 170 (3d Cir.1986); see also Kelly v. Borough of Sayreville, N.J., 107 F.3d 1073, 1077 (3d Cir.1997) (“State law creates the property rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.”).

In Re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II

922 F. Supp. 997 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1996

Fajardo is a well respected physician who is board certified in pathology. … V.

Ismail v. Honeywell International Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2023

O’Haro v. Harrisburg Area Cmty. Coll., No. 1:18-cv-02073, 2020 WL 5819768, at *14 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 30, 2020) (citing Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001)). … (citing Brown, 250 F.3d at 797).

Harrell v. Mayer

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2023

of Inspectors; (3) an appeal of the Chairman's decision to the full Dauphin County Prison Board of Inspectors; and (4) an appeal from the Prison Board's decision to the Dauphin County Solicitor. … sawyers v. Brown, 2014 WL 407337, *2, (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2014).

Ronning v. United States

547 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 13, 1982

Zannino v. Arnold, 531 F.2d 687 (3d Cir. 1976). … Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 , 89 S.Ct. 1794 , 23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969); Lucas Coal Co. v. Interior Board of Mine Operations, 522 F.2d 581 (3d Cir. 1975).

Wirtz v. Riocio

264 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1967

In Durkin v. … Morse Trucking Ltd., 50 Labor Cases ¶ 31,641 (S.D.Calif. 1964); Walling v. James V. Rueter, Inc., 321 U.S. 671 , 64 S.Ct. 826 , 88 L.Ed. 1001 (1944); National Labor Relations Board v.

Donahue v. Brittain

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2025

See id. at 15; Pabon v. Mahanoy, 654 F.3d 385, 391 n.8 (3d Cir. 2011) (explaining operation of “prisoner mailbox rule”). … this [parole board] challenge . . . in his first habeas petition,”15 but he did not.

Bowens v. Harry

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 2022

See Block v. Potter, 631 F.2d 233, 236 & n.2, 238, 240 (3d Cir. 1980); see also Burkett v. … Mickens-Thomas v. Vaughn, 355 F.3d 294, 310 (3d Cir. 2004). Bowens’ disagreement with the Parole Board’s decisions does not establish a right to habeas corpus relief.

Buleishvili v. Hoover

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2021

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Wiconisco Creek Watershed, Ass'n v. Kocher Coal Co.

646 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1986

Relying on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 , 96 S.Ct. 1236 , 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976); Burford v. … The state court proceedings consist of an appeal taken by defendant before the Environmental Hearing Board and defendant’s complaint before the Commonwealth Court.

Miller v. Austin

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2025

“[T]he arbitrary and capricious standard is extremely narrow and allows the Board wide latitude in fulfilling its obligation to review agency disciplinary actions.” United States Postal Service v. … Miller then points the court to Williams v.

Wolfe v. Rivello

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 2024

See Commonwealth v. Wolfe, No. CP-07-CR-135-2000 (Ct. Com. Pl. Blair Crnty.). Wolfe has completed his minimum sentence and has been regularly denied parole by the Pennsylvania Parole Board. See Wolfe v. … See Slack v.