Case law

United States v. Fulani

277 F. Supp. 2d 454 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2003

Aster boarded the *456 bus. Both agents had badges visible on neck chains and earned concealed weapons. Agent Aster boarded the bus first and went directly to the lavatory area in the rear of the bus. … Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34 , 90 S.Ct. 1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970); United States v.

D.N. Ex Rel. Nelson v. Snyder

608 F. Supp. 2d 615 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2009

Brown, 520 U.S. at 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 694 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ). … Natale v. Camden County Corr. Facility, 318 F.3d 575, 584 (3d Cir.2003) (quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ).

Gonzalez v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2022

Here, neither of the state agency psychological consultants recorded findings with respect to Gonzalez’s mental residual functional capacity or any specific limitations, apparently based on their across-the-board findings … See, e.g., Mason v.

English v. Ross

140 F. 630 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 1905

Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U. S. 502 , 25 Sup. Ct. 339, 49 L. Ed. 571 . And upon the most cursory consideration it was patent that that would be the outcome here. … Brown v. Beecher, 120 Pa. 590 , 15 Atl. 608 ; Huston v. Regn, 184 Pa. 419 , 39 Atl. 208 ; Goodwin v. McMinn, 193 Pa. 646 , 44 Atl. 1094 , 74 Am. St. Rep. 703 ; Moran v. Munhall, 204 Pa. 242 , 53 Atl. 1094 ; Burkhart v.

Daniel Miller v. York County Regional Police Department, Chief Timothy Damon, The York County Regional Police Board of Commissioners

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2026

See Falco v. Zimmer, 767 F. … See Morse v. Lower Merion Sch.

United States v. Troy

6 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1934

“Aside from his position as presiding officer of the board of directors and of the stockholders when convened in general meeting, the president of a corporation has by virtue of his office, merely, no greater power than * … eases, where the liberties of the defendant are involved, no intendments can be indulged in favor of an indictment; it must allege ‘all the facts necessary to bring the ease within the intent of the act.’ ” United States v.

United States v. Chiolo

560 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1983

In Blake v. … Blake drew upon the policies enunciated by the Pennsylvania courts in the wake of Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413 , 93 S.Ct. 590 , 34 L.Ed.2d 608 (1973).

NIBCO Inc. v. Viega LLC

354 F. Supp. 3d 566 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 2018

Id. at 436, 437 (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. United States , 370 U.S. 294 , 325, 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) ; Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co. , 952 F.2d 715 , 722 (3d Cir. 1991) ) (citing Eastman Kodak Co. v. … Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc. , 429 U.S. 477 , 488, 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. , 370 U.S. at 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ).

Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp.

902 F. Supp. 523 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 1995

In Liljeberg v. … In Potashnick v.

Kristi H. Ex Rel. Virginia H. v. Tri-Valley School District

107 F. Supp. 2d 628 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2000

Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., 172 F.3d 238, 250 (3d Cir.1999). In Ridgewood, the parents requested a due process hearing in 1996. Id. at 245 . … We are unconvinced by the defendant’s reliance on Bernardsville Board of Education v. J.H., 42 F.3d 149 (3d Cir.1994).

McLaughlin v. Forty Fort Borough

64 F. Supp. 3d 631 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2014

Introduction Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34) filed by Defendants Forty Fort Borough (the “Borough”) and Forty Fort Zoning Hearing Board (the “Board” or “ZHB”) … However, Plaintiffs did not seek relief under these statutes or before the Zoning Hearing Board.

Voorhees v. Colvin

215 F. Supp. 3d 358 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2015

See Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir.1988); Johnson v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 529 F.3d 198, 200 (3d Cir.2008). Substantial evidence is a deferential standard of review. See Jones v. … Kangail v.

Jones v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

18 F.R.D. 181 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1955

For reasons assigned in our opinion in Smith v. … Cooper v. Brown, 3 Cir., 1942, 126 F.2d 874 ; Wright v.

Shoemaker v. City of Lock Haven

906 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1995

Fratantaro v. Kepler, 1992 WL 6754 at * 3 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 14, 1992), citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Citing Bolduc v. Board of Supervisors of Lower Paxton Township, 152 Pa.

POWELL v. MCKEOWN

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2021

Plaintiff presented testimony from inmate Victor Brown. (Id.) Plaintiff alleges that after inmate Brown testified, Defendant McKeown called Defendant Gardzalla and informed him of inmate Brown’s testimony. (Id.) … Inmate Brown then provided testimony. (Id. ¶ 26.)

Smith v. Central Dauphin School District

419 F. Supp. 2d 639 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2005

Thus, Defendants’ reliance on Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Carter v. City of Philadelphia, 989 F.2d 117 (3d Cir.1993) is unfounded. … Connick, 461 U.S. at 145 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 (quoting Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 467 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980)).

Whelan v. Careercom Corp.

711 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1989

Browne v. Maxfield, 663 F.Supp. 1193, 1202 (E.D.Pa.1987) (brackets added). In the instant case, plaintiffs cause of action based upon the above averment fails on the essential element of causation. … See Browne, supra, 663 F.Supp. at 1203 .

Hoffman v. Lehman

926 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1996

DeBlasio v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the Township of West Amwell, 53 F.3d 592, 598-601 (3d Cir.1995); Reich v. Beharry, 883 F.2d 239, 244 (3d Cir.1989). … In Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), the Supreme Court recognized a liberty interest in reputation, especially as it pertains to employment opportunities.

Bair v. Shippensburg University

280 F. Supp. 2d 357 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 2003

West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943). Against this backdrop, we must determine whether Anthony P. … Doe v. Michigan, 721 F.Supp. 852, 864 (E.D.Mich.1989); see also Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Sweezy v.

Dong

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2026

§636(b)(1); Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D.Pa. 2010) (citing Henderson v.