Case law

Durnin v. Allentown Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n.

218 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1963

Guthrie v. Harkness, 199 U.S. 148, 153 , 26 S.Ct. 4 , 50 L.Ed. 130 (1905); Bishop’s Estate v. Antilles Enterprises, 252 F.2d 498 (3d Cir., 1958), Maris, J.; Goldman v. … Orlando v. Reliance Homestead Association, 171 La. 1027 , 132 So. 777 (1931); Henzel v. Patterson Building and Loan Association No. 2, 128 Pa.Super. 531 , 194 A. 683 (1937); White v.

Sklar v. Ryan

752 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1990

Anderson v. Harless, 459 U.S. 4 , 103 S.Ct. 276 , 74 L.Ed.2d 3 (1982); Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155 (3rd Cir.1982). … Murphy, 378 U.S. 52, 77-78 , 84 S.Ct. 1594, 1608-09 , 12 L.Ed.2d 678 ; Ullman v. United States, 350 U.S. 422, 435-36 , 76 S.Ct. 497, 505-06 , 100 L.Ed. 511 (1956); Brown v.

Atkinson v. Lafayette College

653 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2009

.”); Williams v. Phila. Hous. Auth., 380 F.3d 751, 760 (3d Cir.2004) (two months lapse between protected activity and adverse action is too long to permit an inference of causation); Brown v. … Shaner v.

Educational Equality League v. Tate

333 F. Supp. 1202 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1971

Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1966); aff’d on rehearing en banc, 380 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied sub nom., Board of Education of City of Bessemer v. … One case, Turner v. Fouche, infra, has applied the percentage rationale to a school board. However, that case is clearly distinguishable from the instant case.

Kroese v. General Steel Castings Corp.

9 F.R.D. 273 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1949

Of course if the members of the board of directors are indispensable parties, plaintiff’s omission deprives this court of authority- to proceed in the matter. Minnesota v. … Jones v. Costlow, 1944, 349 Pa. 136 , 141—142, 36 A.2d 460 ; Jones v. Motor Sales Co. of Johnstown, 1936, 322 Pa. 492 , 185 A. 809 ; Hlawati v. Maeder-Hlawati Co., 1927, 289 Pa. 233 , 137 A. 235 ; Bloes v.

Verizon Pennsylvania LLC v. Communications Workers of America, Local 13000

216 F. Supp. 3d 530 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2016

Citing a district court decision, Verizon argues that the complete arbitration rule is inapplicable where the arbitration board has issued an unlawful award. (Pl.’s Mem., at 1) (citing Bensalem Park Maint., Ltd. v. … See Matteson et al. v. Ryder System Inc. et al., 99 F.3d 108, 112 (3d Cir. 1996).

Harper v. Vaughn

272 F. Supp. 2d 527 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2003

The Fifth Circuit reversed, holding that the district court committed error in relying solely on the affidavit of Brown’s trial attorney in denying Brown’s habeas petition. … The Brown court’s reasoning is inapplicable to this case. First, the Brown court granted relief based on its finding that Brown had presented a facially adequate claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

L. W. Foster Sportswear Co. v. United States

145 F. Supp. 148 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1956

National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197 , at page 229, 59 S.Ct. 206 , at page 217, 83 L.Ed. 126 , cited with approval in Universal Camera Corp. v. … Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 93 F.2d 985, 989 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, 6 Cir., 97 F.2d 13, 15 ; Ball-ston-Stillwater Knitting Co. v.

Framlau Corporation v. Dembling

360 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1973

State Board of Parole and Probation, 384 F.2d 238, 239 (9th Cir. 1967); Mattingly v. Elias, 325 F. Supp. 1374, 1375 (E.D.Pa.1971); Conover v. Montemuro, 304 F.Supp. 259, 261 (E.D.Pa.1969); Jones v. … Board of Parole, Commonwealth of Pa., 281 F.Supp. 62, 63 (E.D.Pa.1968); North Allegheny J. Sch. Sys. v. Secretary of Health, etc., 196 F.Supp. 144, 147 (W.D.Pa.1961); Ambassade Realty Corporation v.

Connor v. United States

87 F. Supp. 847 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1949

Tabitha Brown. The libel was filed against the United States of America and the United States Maritime Commission on October 2, 1947. … Seas Shipping Co., Inc. v. Sieracki, 328 U.S. 85 , 66 S.Ct. 872 , 90 L.Ed. 1099 ; Minnie v. Port Huron Terminal Co. et al., supra; Southern Pacific Co. v.

Pennsylvania Family Institute, Inc. v. Celluci

489 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2007

.”); Brown v. … . § 2101(a) (2007) (“In accordance with section 18 of Article V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, the Judicial Conduct Board shall be an independent board within the Judicial Branch and shall consist of 12 persons selected

Rodriguez v. Bush

367 F. Supp. 2d 765 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 2005

FDA v. … See, e.g., Pure Oil Co. v.

Grossmuller v. Budd Co. Consolidated Retirement Benefit Plan for Employees

547 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1982

Nor was the plaintiff ever advised by the Local Board or the National Board of ways in which he could submit issues and comments about his termination. Of useful comparison is Amato v. … See Grossmuller v.

NAACP-SCP v. Cortes

591 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2008

ballots; ballots that the county board of elections has supplied to the district election board for use as provisional ballots; or other paper ballots that are "either printed or written and of any suitable form." … Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 585 , 84 S.Ct. 1362 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964). Furthermore, in U.S. v. City of Philadelphia, No. 06-4592, 2006 WL 3922115 (E.D.Pa.

Horizon Financial, F.A. v. Norris (In Re Norris)

138 B.R. 467 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1992

See also Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988) (“The findings of fact by the bankruptcy court are re viewable only for clear error.” (citations omitted)). … Brown, 851 F.2d at 84 ; Frymire v.

Baksalary v. Smith

579 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1984

See Pennsylvania v. Board of Trusts, 353 U.S. 230 , 77 S.Ct. 806 , 1 L.Ed.2d 792 (1957); Pennsylvania v. Brown, 392 F.2d 120 (3d Cir.1968), cert, denied, 391 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 657 (1968). … Schier v. Temple University, Civil Action No. 82-3554 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 8, 1983) (bench opinion per Poliak, J.); accord Isaacs v. Board of Trustees of Temple University, 385 F.Supp. 473 (E.D.Pa. 1974).

Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Epsco, Incorporated

224 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1963

Ojay Mills, Inc., supra; nor the complete emasculation of the powers of subsidiary’s board of directors as in Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.

Jeanes Hospital v. Leavitt

453 F. Supp. 2d 888 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2006

Ctr. v. Heckler, 806 F.2d 1185, 1191 (3d Cir.1986). 61 . Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 512 , 114 S.Ct. 2381 , 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994). 62 . Id. (quoting Gardebring v. … Mercy Home Health v. Leavitt, 436 F.3d 370, 380 (3d Cir.2006) (quoting Richardson v.

Cooper v. Perkiomen Airways, Ltd.

609 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1985

Brown at 112 , 75 S.Ct. at 143 . In Johnson v. … Likewise, in Parker v.

Sorenson v. Selective Service System

203 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1962

Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 , 75 S.Ct. 591 , 99 L.Ed. 868 (1955); Shields v. Barrow, 58 U.S. 129 , 15 L.Ed. 158 (1855). … Townsend v. Zimmerman, 237 F.2d 376 (6th Cir., 1956); Tomlinson v. Hershey, 95 F.Supp. 72 (E.D.Pa.1949).