Case law

SWARTZ v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2022

Rendell-Baker v. … Ross v.

Hixon v. Durbin

560 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1983

Three Rivers Cable-Vision, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh, 502 F.Supp. 1118 (W.D.Pa.1980). Accord Duva v. World Boxing Assoc., 548 F.Supp. 710 (D.N.J.1982); Teleprompter of Erie, Inc. v. … See Dubree v. Commonwealth, 481 Pa. 540 , 393 A.2d 293 (1978); Zdaniewicz v. Sands, 288 Pa. Super. 420 , 432 A.2d 231 (1981); Picariello v. Commonwealth, 54 Pa.Cmwlth.Ct. 252, 421 A.2d 477 (1980). 6 .

Logemann v. Laird

346 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1972

Rothfuss v. Resor, 443 F.2d 554 (5 Cir. 1971); United States ex rel. Greenwood v. Resor, 439 F.2d 1249 (4 Cir. 1971); Bohnert v. Falkner, 438 F.2d 747 (6 Cir. 1971); Champ v. … Rothfuss v. Resor, supra; Champ v. Seamans, supra; Nachand v. Seaman, supra.

Jones v. Johnson

402 F. Supp. 992 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1975

v. … Nuble v. Boor, Civil No. 74-1708 (E.D.Pa., Oct. 9, 1975); Reiff v. Commonwealth, 397 F.Supp. 345 (D.C.Pa.1975). See also, Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1974); Joyce v.

BROWN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2026

June 25, 2026 Plaintiffs Andrew Brown and HC Composites LLC, Inc. … See Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg.

King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

88 F. Supp. 3d 402 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 2015

Brown Univ. in Providence in State of R.I., 5 F.3d 658 , 668 n. 8 (3d Cir.1993) (remarking that the rule of reason analysis has largely remained unchanged since it was first defined in Chicago Board of Trade v. … Dental Ass’n v. Med. Svc. Ass’n of Pa., 745 F.2d 248, 255 (3d Cir.1984) (citing Chicago Board of Trade, 246 U.S. at 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242 ).

United States Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Wheeler

321 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1970

In Weber v. … The Board there said: “The Board unanimously believed that Pvt.

Keiser v. Bell

332 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 1971

V. … In Hopt v.

Robinson v. Largent

311 F. Supp. 1032 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1970

Heyd, 299 F.Supp. 939 (E.D.La.1969); Jones v. Board of Probation and Parole, 281 F.Supp. 62 (E.D.Pa.1968); United States ex rel. Gomori v. … Dickson, 403 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 990 , 89 S.Ct. 1477 , 22 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969); Paige v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole, C.A. No. 69-2150 (E.D.Pa., filed January 8, 1970); Simmons v.

Brand v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

22 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 1938

It is an accepted doctrine that such boards and commissions have the legal power to function without being interfered with by the courts. Myers v. … The case of Carroll v.

Miller v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.

198 F.R.D. 638 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2001

Miller, Ralph Brown, Vincent Gray, Charles Knight, Michael Jones, Harold G. Williams, Jerry Hemingway, Barry C. … Co. v. Brown, 511 U.S. 117, 120-21 , 114 S.Ct. 1359, 1361 , 128 L.Ed.2d 33 (1994); cf. Ortiz v.

Coregis Insurance v. Law Offices of Carole F. Kafrissen, P.C.

186 F. Supp. 2d 567 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2002

But see Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Pa.Super. 1, 20-21 , 174 A. 748 , 756 (1934); Messner v. Korbonits, 39 Pa. D. & C.3d 182, 185 (1982); Emejota Eng’g Corp. v. Kent Polymers Inc., Civ. A. … The minutes contained communications from the board members to the lawyer and from the lawyer to the board members. See id.

Atkinson v. Lafayette College

653 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2009

.”); Williams v. Phila. Hous. Auth., 380 F.3d 751, 760 (3d Cir.2004) (two months lapse between protected activity and adverse action is too long to permit an inference of causation); Brown v. … Shaner v.

Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

79 F.R.D. 98 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1978

The commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2) may also be satisfied where the complaint alleges an “across the board” or permeating policy of discrimination. Presseisen v. … Other courts in this district have also held that allegations of “across-the-board” discrimination are sufficient to support a finding of commonality under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(2). See Webb v.

Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.

502 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1980

Gary Brown started worked at the Yeadon produce facility and was laid off in September, 1971. 11. Carl Green started work at the Yea-don produce facility in 1964. … Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 191 , 87 S.Ct. 903, 917 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967).

Pennsylvania Family Institute, Inc. v. Celluci

489 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2007

.”); Brown v. … . § 2101(a) (2007) (“In accordance with section 18 of Article V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, the Judicial Conduct Board shall be an independent board within the Judicial Branch and shall consist of 12 persons selected

Spangle v. Valley Forge Sewer Authority

668 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1987

In Celotex Corp. v. … In Sorba v.

United States ex rel. Manning v. Brierley

285 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 1967

Brown and Richard S. Lowe were appointed by the Court to represent Manning. … Henry v. State of Mississippi, 379 U.S. 443 , 85 S.Ct. 564 , 13 L.Ed.2d 408 (1965); Budd v. Rundle, 267 F.Supp. 49 (E.D.Pa.1967); United States ex rel. Realmuto v. Wallack, 254 F.Supp. 1006 (S.D.N.Y.1966).

Garrell v. Commanding Officer

312 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1970

United States v. … v.

Richelson v. Yost

738 F. Supp. 2d 589 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2010

See Kamen v. Kemper Fin. … See, e.g., Levner v.