Case law

Dennis

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 2026

We will proceed to trial next month on the excessive force and common law assault and battery claims against Correctional Officers Henry and Brown. I. … Spivack v. City of Phila., 109 F.4th 158, 165-66 (3d Cir. 2024) (citing Peroza-Benitez v.

United States v. Local 30, United Slate, Tile Etc.

686 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 1988

In early 1972, Union officials Traitz, Jack Kinkade, Carlton Brown (“Brown”) and others tried to organize the Kitson *1145 Bros, workers, sponsoring a dinner for them at the Waterfall Lounge. … A vote as to whether a representation election should be held by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) was held. The ballot box was in the room with Brown, who was visibly armed with a handgun.

Schauffler ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 677, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers

201 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1961

etc. v. … Store Union v. Rains, 5 Cir., 1959, 266 F.2d 503 , 505-506; Douds v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union, 2 Cir., 1957, 248 F.2d 534 , 538; Dooley v. Highway Truck Drivers, D.C.Del.1960, 182 F.Supp. 297, 301 .

Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

388 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1974

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Brown v. *165 Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); McLaurin v. … Belton, supra, later became one of the four companion cases in Brown v. Board of Education, see 347 U.S. 483 , 486 n. 1 and 494 n. 10, 74 S.Ct. 686 . As chancellor, Judge Seitz wrote: “ . . .

Sciotto Ex Rel. Sciotto v. Marple Newtown School District

81 F. Supp. 2d 559 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1999

See Brown v. Gra-bowski 922 F.2d 1097, 1118 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991). See also Hayes v. … v.

HOOPER v. THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2020

Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994) (footnote and citation omitted); see also Wilkinson v. … See Coady v. Vaughn, 251 F.3d 480, 485 (3d Cir. 2001). Indeed, Hooper has already filed a habeas petition challenging the Board’s calculation of his sentence, and his petition is currently pending.3 See Hooper v.

HOOPER v. THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2020

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-CV-0399 : THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION … Hooper’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. CaremarkPCS Health, L.P.

254 F.R.D. 253 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2008

Brown, Ms. Hedberg, Ms. Hankins, Ms. Samantha Brown, another in-house lawyer at Care-mark, and Cheryl Hall, Manager of Pricing, all CC’d on the e-mail. Id.; see also Def.’s Mem. Ex. A. Ms. … Brown, Mr. Parrish, Ms. Pollio, and Mr. Elder. These e-mails were produced. Ms.

United States v. One 1951 Oldsmobile Sedan

129 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1955

The facts here are more analogous to the cases of United States v. One 1941 Pontiac Sedan, D.C.N.Y.1948, 83 F. Supp. 999 and United States v. One Dodge Coupe, etc., D.C.N.Y.1942, 43 F. Supp. 60 . … Sanders v.

Schauffler v. Local 1357, Retail Clerks International Ass'n

199 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1961

. § 159 (c), being filed within” thirty days from May 5, 1961. 4 See McLeod v. … The interesting legal questions raised by respondent should be disposed of by the Board, rather than by the court, in view of this language from pages 10-11 of the recent opinion in Schauffler Regional Director, etc. v.

Hesling v. Avon Grove School District

428 F. Supp. 2d 262 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2006

See C.M. v. Board of Educ. of Union County Regional High Sch. Dist., 128 Fed.Appx. 876, 880 (3d Cir.2005); Bucks County Dep’t of Mental Health v. … Berg, 219 F.3d at 276 (citing Bd. of County Comm'rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).

Samoff v. BUILDING & CONST. TRADES COUN. OF PHILA.

346 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 1972

V. … Brown, 284 F.2d 619 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 934 , 81 S.Ct. 1659 , 6 L.Ed.2d 846 (1961); Joiner, Inc., 135 NLRB 876 ; NLRB v.

Miller v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.

202 F.R.D. 142 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 2001

Miller, Ralph Brown, Vincent Gray, Charles Knight, Michael Jones, Harold G. Williams, Jerry Hemingway, Barry C. … Alexander v.

Pennsylvania System Board of Adjustment of Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Pennsylvania R.

294 F. 556 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1923

, influenced, or it may be aroused, by the opinion of the board. … , and thus to escape the consequence of a finding by the board.

Kauffman v. Osser

321 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1971

In the case of Haakenson v. … Id.; Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 , 84 S.Ct. 526 , 11 L.Ed.2d 481 (1964). This right to vote is fundamental. E. g., McDonald v. Board of Election, etc., 394 U.S. 802, 806, 807 , 89 S.

Thompson v. US Airways, Inc.

717 F. Supp. 2d 468 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2010

See Travers v. JetBlue Airways, 2009 WL 2242391 , 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63699 (D.Mass., July 23, 2009) (O’Toole, J.) (dismissing skycaps’ state law claims as preempted); Brown v. … Judge Gertner based her original, pre Travers preemption ruling in Brown on the authority of Judge Young’s first preemption ruling in DiFiore v.

Collins v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

257 F. Supp. 2d 812 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 2003

The relevant statute, pertaining to judicial review of decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board, provides that a petition to review a final order or final decision of the Board shall be filed in the United States Court … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 828 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). See also Robinson v.

Hoersch v. Froehlke

382 F. Supp. 1235 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1974

O’Mara v. Zebrowski, sup ra, Smith v. Resor, supra, Schonbrun v. Commanding Officer, supra, Fox v. Brown, supra, Winters v. United States, supra. … O’Mara v. Zebrowski, 447 F.2d 1085 (3d. Cir. 1971); Byrne v. Resor, 412 F.2d 774 (3d Cir. 1969); Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1967); Schonbrun v.

Denckla v. Maes

313 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 1970

Hartmann v. Time, Inc., 166 F.2d 127 (3rd Cir. 1948); Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc., 174 F.2d 914 (3rd Cir. 1948); Commonwealth v. Brown, 260 F.Supp. 323 (E.D.Pa.1966). II. … McClintoch v.

Wolk Law Firm v. U.S. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd.

392 F. Supp. 3d 514 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2019

In McGilvra v. National Transportation Safety Board , 840 F. Supp. 100 (D. Colo. 1993), cited by the NTSB, the court faced a FOIA request for the CVR tape from an aircraft crash. … In McGilvra v. National Transportation Safety Board , 840 F. Supp. 100 (D. Colo. 1993), cited by the NTSB, the court faced a FOIA request for the CVR tape from an aircraft crash.