Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

4.47s

  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown

    260 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 1966

    Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 493-495 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 7 . Compare Jaffe, Standing to Secure Judicial Review: Private Actions, 75 Harv.L.Rev. 255, 300 (1961).

    Reversed on other grounds by Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969)Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.

    229 F. 444 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1916

    The cause reached on appeal the Supreme Court of the state and is reported in Rea v. Penna. Canal Co., 249 Pa. 239 , 94 Atl. 833 . The principle invoked here is the res ad judicata principle. … When such persons are acting for the corporation, the only direct evidence which can be had of that fact is their own declaration, or a recorded resolution of its board of directors.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hahnemann University Hospital

    20 F. Supp. 3d 538 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2014

    Grossman v. Barke, 868 A.2d 561, 567 (Pa.Super.Ct.2005). Brown asserts that he has met that standard. … The Court will therefore deny Brown’s motion for summary judgment. V.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    458 F. Supp. 49 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1978

    Brown has indeed violated his probation. I note at the outset that the revocation of probation is a matter which rests squarely within the discretion of the district court. Burns v. … Brown relies heavily on United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 , 92 S.Ct. 455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown

    270 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1967

    Com. of Pennsylvania v. Board of Directors of City Trusts, 357 U.S. 570 , 78 S.Ct. 1383 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1546 (1958). … See Com. of Pennsylvania v. Board of Directors of City Trusts, supra.” 382 U.S. at 299 , 86 S.Ct. at 488 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    417 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1976

    In Sanders v. … Lindsey v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    101 F. Supp. 939 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1951

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. American Motorists Insurance

    930 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1996

    Co. v. Brown, 834 F.Supp. 854, 856 (E.D.Pa.1993). Whether a particular loss is within a policy’s coverage is a question of law that may be decided at the summary judgment stage. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. The Independence

    4 F. Cas. 399 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1836

    This is to prove another certificate of the time of Brown’s discharge from the hospital; the proceedings of a police court, the sentence of that court, the nature of the wound inflicted on Brown, and the hospital expenses … In the case of Hart v. The Little John [Case No. 6,153], the ship had delivered her cargo at Liverpool.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. The Neptune

    4 F. Cas. 413 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 1829

    Part of the time he was in prison, put there by the captain, probably because he would not come on board; but this is not distinctly known. Our information upon these points is very imperfect and unsatisfactory. … This is not chargeable to Brown. Again, he left the brig on Friday, but the pilot did not come on board before Sunday; and, as the captain was not acquainted with the river, he could not have sailed without his pilot.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Home Insurance v. Brown

    298 F. Supp. 160 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1969

    Knight Realty Corp., 242 F.Supp. 337 (E.D.Pa.1965), 370 F.2d 624 (3d Cir. 1967), and Reading Company v. Brown, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al., 391 U.S. 471 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968). … Francis Shunk Brown, 3rd, Trustee, etc.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    197 F. Supp. 3d 726 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2016

    Otis Brown, Jr. … Brown Decl. ¶ 2; see also United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gill & Fisher, Ltd.

    50 F. 939 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1892

    Campbell v. Society, 4 Bosw. 298 ; Salter v. Burt, 20 Wend., 205 ; Avery v. Stewart, 2 Conn. 69 ; Chaffee v. Railroad Co., 146 Mass. 221 , [16 N. E. Rep. 34.] … As said in Coxe v. Heisley, 19 Pa. St. 247, a local usage if it be ancient, uniform, notorious and reasonable, may enter into and become part of a contract which is to be executed at the place where the usage prevails.”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.

    274 F. 467 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1921

    American v. Grand Rivers (C. C.) 159 Fed. 775 , sustains this distinction. The fund there was the property of the defendants, against which the plaintiffs had a claim in common.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    19 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1937

    Ewald & Co. v. Commissioner, 18 B.T.A. 1130, 1133 . … Porter v. United States, 27 F.(2d) 882 (C.C.A.9).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    147 F. Supp. 3d 312 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2015

    See Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348, 354 , 116 S.Ct. 1373 , 134 L.Ed.2d 498 (1996); United States v. Renfroe, 825 F.2d 763, 765-66 (3d Cir.1987) (citing Drope v. … Defendant Dorothy June Brown is not competent to stand trial. See, e.g., United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    287 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1968

    Stapf v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 367 F.2d 326 (1966); Dunn v. United States, 376 F.2d 191 (4th Cir. 1967). … Williams v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 255 , 335 F.2d 290 (1964); Scott *445 v. United States, 326 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1964); United States v. Deaton, 364 F.2d 820 (6th Cir. 1966); Powers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown University

    772 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1991

    Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan, 182 F.2d 329 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 851 , 71 S.Ct. 79 , 95 L.Ed. 624 (1950); Expoconsul Int’l Inc. v. … See Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235 , 102 S.Ct. 252 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981); Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 , 84 S.Ct. 805 , 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964); Gulf Oil Corp. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • King v. M.R. Brown, Inc.

    911 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1995

    environment by making lewd comments about the anatomy of female customers, hanging a sexually suggestive poster in the restaurant’s kitchen, and permitting the posting of explicit hand-drawn pictures on the employee bulletin board … See also Harris v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    24 F. Cas. 1250 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1830

    Lee v. Coleshill, Cro. … In the case of Bolton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.