Case law

AFZAL v. AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 2022

Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 939 (1982)). 27 Von Muller, 2011 WL 857337, at *3 (citing Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 801 (3d Cir. 2001)); see also Jenkins v. Ne. … Nov. 10, 2021) (citing Kach v.

MIGLIORI v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2022

In Taylor v. … In doing so, the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on two Supreme Court cases: Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1969) and Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996).

Wright v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Wright)

133 B.R. 704 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1991

Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988). The Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., was enacted in 1968 to promote the informed use of consumer credit. … Regulation Z “absent some obvious repugnance to the statute should be accepted by the courts, as should the Board’s interpretation of its own regulation.” Anderson Brothers Ford v.

Pennsylvania ex rel. Rafferty v. Philadelphia Psychiatric Center

356 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1973

Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960); Wieman v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Purdie v. Tierney

769 F. Supp. 864 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1991

For example: "A parole board may revoke parole on the basis of an offense even if the parolee is never criminally charged or if he is acquitted or if the charges are dismissed prior to trial.” Brown v. Pa. … See also United States v. Chambers, 429 F.2d 410, 411 (3d Cir.1970). An appeal of the Board’s decision may be taken to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court. 3 .

Nolen v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

32 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1998

by the Board in good faith shall be binding” was a grant of discretionary authority); Quinn v. … Aug.19, 1997) (same); Morris v. Paul Revere Ins. Group, 986 F.Supp. 872, 881-882 (D.N.J. 1997) (adopting the Eleventh Circuit’s approach in Brown); Rizzo v. Paul Revere Ins.

Peters v. Delaware River Port Authority

785 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1992

In Yancoskie v. … v.

United States v. Reading Co.

295 F. 551 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1923

Douglas v. Merceles, 25 N. J. Eq. 144; Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co., 118 Mo. 447 , 24 S. W. 129 ; Henry v. North American Railway Construction Co., 158 Fed. 79 , 85 C. C. A. 409 . … Venner v. Southern Pacific Co. (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 832 ; Merriman v. National Zinc Corporation, 82 N. J. Eq. 493, 89 Atl. 764 .

Collins v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.

66 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1946

Scott v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., D. C., 55 F. Supp. 982 ; Wells v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., 6 Cir., 145 F.2d 240 . … Brown v. Minngas Co., D.C., 51 F.Supp. 363 . 2. Where the transmission of information is, of itself, the employer’s principal business. Moss v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., D.C., 42 F.Supp., 807 . 3.

The Astral

134 F. 1017 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1905

The libelant was a seaman on board the bark Astral during a voyage from Honolulu to Philadelphia, .and has proceeded in rem against the ship to recover damages for injuries suffered by reason of the master’s neglect of duty … Scarff v. Metcalf, 107 N. Y. 211 , 13 N. E. 796 , 1 Am. St. Rep. 807 . “3.

France Packing Co. v. Dailey

67 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1946

Lodge: I should like to invite the Senator’s attention to section 8, page 3, which contains the provision that— “ ‘Whenever any labor dispute has been certified to the Board, or jixrisdiction assumed on the Board’s own motion … The plaintiff’s complaint alleges that the defendant Dailey is a shop steward and the defendants Brown and Kober are committeemen. The War Labor Disputes Act began as S. 796, 78th Congress, 1st Session (1943).

Enterra Corp. v. SGS ASSOCIATES

600 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1985

v. … See Panter v.

Whittington v. Bowen

700 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1988

Eshleman later submitted separate reports to the Workmen’s Compensation Board (“the Board”) on June 3, 1985, December 13, 1985 and July 24, 1986 in which he opined that Plaintiff was incapable of performing any work due to … Discussion The standard of review to be applied in this case is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Secretary’s decision. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Brown v.

Porter v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Porter)

129 B.R. 397 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1991

Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988). Appellant appeals only issues of law. Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (a). … The Federal Reserve Board also issues staff commentary. When the statute or regulation does not expressly govern a disclosure issue, courts may look to the commentary for guidance. Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Adhi Parasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational, & Cultural Society of North America v. Township of West Pikeland

721 F. Supp. 2d 361 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2010

Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 271 (3d Cir.2009). … Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 607 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961).

Dunson v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.

346 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2004

Brown v. Francis, 75 F.3d 860, 865 (3d Cir.1996). 2 The burden of proof is on the party removing the case to show the presence of federal jurisdiction. … The Third Circuit in Cook v.

Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Kimball

444 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1977

See Goldberg v. … and there is non-disclosure or misleading disclosure as to the material facts of the transaction, a cause of action is stated under Section 10(b)]; contra Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v.

Litton RCS, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

376 F. Supp. 579 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1974

Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A.2d 877 (1973). The doctrine of sovereign immunity still maintains its viability. Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566 , 305 A.2d 868 (1973). … See also, Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31 (3 Cir. filed May 3, 1974). 17 .

Okocci v. KLEIN, CO.

270 F. Supp. 2d 603 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2003

Brown and Warden Wagner to be addressed. … Belcher v. City of Foley, 30 F.3d 1390, 1395-6 (11th Cir.1994), Andrews at 1078 , citing, Thelma D. by Delores A. v. Board of Educ., 934 F.2d 929, 934 (8th Cir.1991), citing, Harris, 489 U.S. at 396, 109 S.Ct. 1197 .

United States v. Rodenbough

21 F.2d 781 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1927

Brown v. Fitz, 13 N. H, 283. … S. v. Phellis, 257 U. S. 156 , 42 S. Ct. 53 , 66 L.