Case law

BROWN-BREMER v. PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR SKILLED NURSING HOME

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 2022

See Rockmore v. Harrisburg Prop. Serv., 501 F. … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984); Seitzinger, 164 F.3d at 240.

Stanson v. Carroll

316 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1970

Plaintiffs in these four cases are persons accused of committing crimes in Philadelphia County who allege that a local Rule of Court, Rule 301, promulgated by the Board of Judges of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, … Cooper v. Hutchinson, 184 F.2d 119 , 122 (C.A. 3, 1951); accord, Matzner v. Brown, 288 F.Supp. 612 (D.N.J. 1968) , aff’d, 410 F.2d 1376 (C.A. 3, 1969) .

Remick v. Manfredy

52 F. Supp. 2d 452 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1999

See: Vetrotex Certainteed Corp. v. … Pierce v. Montgomery County Opportunity Board, 884 F.Supp. 965 (E.D.Pa.1995). Malice, i.e., an intent to injure, and lack of justification are essential elements to a civil conspiracy cause of action.

Brewer v. SmithKline Beacham Corp.

774 F. Supp. 2d 720 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2011

between 15 and 30 minutes, the three directors vote on a limited number of financial issues on an agenda prepared in Philadelphia. 22 They typically review and approve financial statements that have been prepared by George Brown … See White v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., Civ. A. No. 10-2141, 2010 WL 3119926 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 6, 2010); Hoch v. Eli Lilly & Co., 736 F.Supp.2d 219 (D.D.C.2010).

Santiago v. City of Philadelphia

435 F. Supp. 136 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1977

Yurkovich, 409 F.Supp. 557, 559 (N.D.Ill.1975); Williams v. Brown, 398 F.Supp. 155, 160-61 (N.D.Ill.1975). VII. … See also Black v. Brown, supra at 654 n.3; Tucker v. City of Montgomery Board of Comm’r, 410 F.Supp. 494, 508 (M.D.Ala.1976).

Carpenter v. COM., PA. LIQUOR CONTROL BD.

508 F. Supp. 148 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1981

See Usery v. Manchester East *149 Catholic School Board, 430 F.Supp. 188 (D.N.H.1977). However, this conclusion does not preclude Congress’ use of Section 5 as a separate and independent source of authority as well. … Board of Education of Salt Lake City, 421 F.Supp. 718 (D.Utah 1976). Exercise of Congressional authority under Section 5, unlike the Commerce Clause, is not limited by the Tenth Amendment. Usery v.

Stout v. Peugeot Motors of America

662 F. Supp. 1016 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1986

In Neville Chemical Company v. … The decisive testimony with respect to Yellow Cab came from Juanita Brown and Paul Higley, who were founders and officials of the organization. Brown, under questioning by defense counsel, testified as follows: Q.

Piedmont Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n

863 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1994

Inc. v. Marquar, 980 F.2d 359, 379-82 (6th Cir.1992); Burlington Northern R.R. v. … . -, 113 S.Ct. 1028 , 122 L.Ed.2d 173 (1993); Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Brown, 252 F.2d 149, 155 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 949 , 78 S.Ct. 913 , 2 L.Ed.2d 843 (1958); National Airlines, Inc. v.

HOWARD v. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2024

See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F. … See Lance v.

Matter of IJ Knight Realty Corp.

431 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1977

Otte v. United States, supra. It is settled that the fire damage claims are administrative expenses of the receivership. Reading Co. v. Brown, supra. … Dry Goods Co. v. United States, supra, the Board made it clear that a tentative return would not start the statutory period running. 44 B.T.A. at 570 . 4 .

E. Rockhill Twp. v. Richard E. Pierson Materials Corp.

386 F. Supp. 3d 493 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2019

Counterclaim Defendants include the Township, East Rockhill Township Board of Supervisors ("the Board"), Township Manager and Zoning Officer Marianne Morano, and Board members Gary Volovnik, David Nyman, and Jim Nietupski … Stat. § 8550 . " 'Willful misconduct' in this context 'has the same meaning as the term intentional tort.' " Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp. , 269 F.3d 205 , 214 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting Delate v.

MIGLIORI v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2022

: No. 5:22-cv-00397 : LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS : et al., … Kos Pharms., Inc. v. Andrx Corp., 369 F.3d 700, 708 (3d Cir. 2004); Bieros v. Nicola, 857 F. Supp. 445, 446 (E.D. Pa. 1994).

Chester Upland School District v. Pennsylvania

284 F.R.D. 305 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2012

V. … Brown’s students’ are being denied FAPE. Ms. Brown also highlighted two eases in which the decrease in services caused the students to regress academically and emotionally.

GUMMINGER v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION/PAROLE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2023

See West v. … See Coady v. Vaughn, 251 F.3d 480, 487 (3d Cir. 2001) (addressing substantive due process claim in habeas petition claiming that Board improperly denied petitioner’s application for parole); Disabatino v. Pa.

AFZAL v. AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 2022

They allege the more difficult exam disadvantages “Black Brown” doctors. … Assoc., 972 F.3d 262, 270-71, n.2 (3d Cir. 2020) (quoting Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 939 (1982)). 24 Von Muller, 2011 WL 857337, at *3 (citing Brown v.

Samoff ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees' Union Local 568

223 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1963

The standard to be applied has been authoritatively defined in Schauffler v. … The Board has submitted a series of suggested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. I shall consider them Requests for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

United States v. Reading Co.

295 F. 551 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1923

Douglas v. Merceles, 25 N. J. Eq. 144; Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co., 118 Mo. 447 , 24 S. W. 129 ; Henry v. North American Railway Construction Co., 158 Fed. 79 , 85 C. C. A. 409 . … Venner v. Southern Pacific Co. (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 832 ; Merriman v. National Zinc Corporation, 82 N. J. Eq. 493, 89 Atl. 764 .

MIGLIORI v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 2023

See Sole v. … V.

ROMANELLI v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF REGISTERED NURSES

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2022

.”); Fitzpatrick v. … Mar. 7, 2019) (“the Board of Registered Nursing is a California state agency”).

Ninth Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

15 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1936

One with which it is on all fours is City Bank Farmers’ Trust Co. v. U. S. (D.C.) 5 F.Supp. 871 , affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 74 F.(2d) 692 . The case of the Pennsylvania Company v. … Brown (D.C.) 6 F.Supp. 582 , ruled by Judge Kirkpatrick, affirmed in (C.C.A.) 70 F.(2d) 269 , is not in conflict with the rul ing of Judge Hand. Another case which we think gives it support is U. S. v.