Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.02s
United States v. Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Ass'n
242 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1965
Las Vegas Merchant Plumbers Ass’n v. United States, supra, 210 F. 2d p. 748-749; Plymouth Dealers Ass’n v. United States, 279 F.2d 128, 130-131 (9th Cir. 1960). See also Associated Press v. … Nat’l Ass’n of Real Estate Boards, 339 U.S. 485, 488-492 , 70 S.Ct. 711 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 (1950), the defendants’position has no merit.
Cited 17 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2026
Brown v. City of Philadelphia, 750 F. App’x 171, 173 (3d Cir. 2018) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989)). … Thompson v. Yolanda Denise Thompson Soc. Sec. Tr., No. 20-3791, 2020 WL 4570707, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2020) (quoting United States v. Wunder, No. 16-9452, 2019 WL 2928842, at *5 (D.N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRIDPATH v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2020
Babayan, 430 F.3d at 137 (quoting Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493, 501 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004)). … (quoting Brown, 860 A.2d at 501). Moreover, “bad faith is not present merely because an insurer makes a low but reasonable estimate of an insured’s damages.” Johnson v. Progressive Inc. Co., 987 A.2d 781, 784 (Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknown21 F.2d 119 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1927
The agents then went to the front door of the brewery, and, upon being refused admittance, climbed up over the ear siding, took an ax, broke a pane of glass, and some pine boards behind it, and entered the brewery. … The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Carroll v. United States, 267 U. S. 132 , 45 S. Ct. 280 , 69 L. Ed. 543 , 39 A. L.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrotherhood Mutual Insurance v. Salem Baptist Church
985 F. Supp. 2d 624 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 2013
In the fall of 2008, at the behest of Terri White, then-chairperson of its Board of Trustees, Salem undertook to compare various other insurance plans to the commercial general liability insurance policy under which the church … Bower again returned to the church and gave a formal proposal to some six representatives of the church board or leadership. In conjunction with or immediately following this presentation, Mr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFederal Trade Commission v. Manufacturers Hanover Consumer Services, Inc.
543 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1982
In FTC v. … In FEC v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMCCRAY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 2024
Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481–82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., No. 13-7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWEINBERG v. LEGION ATHLETICS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2023
The remaining defendants are members of Legion’s Scientific Review Board (“Review Board”) and reside in Florida, Arizona, Kansas, Indiana, Nevada, Tennessee, North Carolina, California, Michigan, Ohio, Canada, Finland, … Jessie Hoffman, and Astrid Naranjo as the “Review Board defendants.” DI 1 ¶ 4-17.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrooks v. City of Philadelphia
747 F. Supp. 2d 477 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2010
See Roa v. … The Court in Davis made it clear that the Plaintiff in that case was not asking that the Court expand liability to hold the Board liable for the student’s actions, but rather it was seeking “to hold the Board liable for its
Cited 7 timesPublished296 F. 527 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1924
The respondents offered in evidence rule 20 of the Harbor Rules and Regulations for the Port of Philadelphia promulgated by the board of commissioners of navigation for the river Delaware and its navigable tributaries under … Wright & Cobb Lighterage Co. v. New England Navigation Co. 204 Fed. 762 , 125 C. C.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPresseisen v. Swarthmore College
442 F. Supp. 593 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 1977
The President is the principal administrative officer, responsible to the Board. [N.T. 17-21 to 17-24.] … Following the deliberations of the Committee on Promotion and Tenure, the President makes a recommendation to the Instructions and Library Committee of the Board of Managers for its action. [N.T. 18-30, 18-31.] V.
Cited 41 timesPublishedPaparo v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
43 F. Supp. 2d 547 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1999
In Rosen v. … For example, in Neill v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCoram Healthcare Corp. v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc.
94 F. Supp. 2d 589 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1999
Jiffy Lube Intern’l, Inc. v. Jiffy Lube of Pa., Inc., 848 F.Supp. 569, 576 (E.D.Pa.1994); see also, Brown v. SAP America, No. C.A. *594 98-507-SLR, 1999 WL 803888 , at *5 (D.Del. Sept.13,1999). … Cipolla v. Shaposka, 439 Pa. 563 , 267 A.2d 854, 856 (1970).
Cited 36 timesPublishedEdmundson v. Borough of Kennett Square
881 F. Supp. 188 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1995
See, e.g., Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 154 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1693-94 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). … Czurlanis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew Hampshire Insurance v. Dielectric Communications, Inc.
872 F. Supp. 2d 458 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2012
Paolella v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 158 F.3d 183, 189 (3d Cir.1998). A Third Circuit Court of Appeals opinion on the issue controls. A. … See Hullett v.
Cited 5 timesPublished779 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1991
Kyees v. County Dep’t. of Public Welfare, 600 F.2d 693, 694 (7th Cir.1979); Drummond v. … This court is not empowered to sit as a super adoption agency review board.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGEORGE v. PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 2025
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). … International Ass’n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc., 372 U.S. 682, 685 (1963). “The arbitral board’s jurisdiction is exclusive and cannot be avoided by efforts to bring [a] dispute directly into court.”
Cited 0 timesUnknown140 F. 208 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1905
Davis v. Brown, 94 U. S. 423 , 24 L. Ed. 204 . … Cavanaugh v. Buehler, 120 Pa. 457 , 14 Atl. 391 ; Williams v. Hay, 120 Pa. 485 , 14 Atl. 379 , 6 Am. St Rep. 719; Kapp v. Shields, 17 Pa. Super. Ct 524.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAHRENDSEN v. PRUDENT FIDUCIARY SERVICES, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2023
The Trustee was chosen by the Board of Directors of World Travel (“the Board”). The Wells defendants are relatives who founded World Travel in 1983. … The Wells defendants, however, retained their positions on the Board.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLewis Ex Rel. Young v. Rendell
501 F. Supp. 2d 671 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2007
Board of County Comm’rs of Saguache County, 2005 WL 2124842 , *4 (D.Colo.2005) (citing Goldberg, 397 U.S. at 262 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 ). … Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna