Case law

Blackburn v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

454 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1978

It has, however, dealt in Hurst v. Triad Shipping Co. and in Brown v. … Brown v. Ivarans Rederi A/S, 545 F.2d at 863 .

Cahn v. International Ladies' Garment Union

203 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1962

See Philadelphia Dress Joint Board v. … See, e. g., Jones v. Brown, 54 Iowa 74 , 6 N. W. 140 (1880). It was stated in Hoosac Tunnel Dock & Elevator Co. v.

Roach v. Kligman

412 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1976

Walnorch v. McMonagle, 412 F.Supp. 270 (E.D.Pa.1976); Brown v. Cliff, 341 F.Supp. 177 (E.D.Pa.1972). See generally Annot., 51 A.L.R.3d 111 (1973). … In stark contrast to these cases is Brown v.

Wright v. Boeing Vertol Co.

704 F. Supp. 76 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1989

The Board received evidence from both sides, including testimony by plaintiff and a presentation by Donahue. … v.

Donaldson v. Severn River Glass Sand Co.

138 F. 691 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1905

Planters, etc., Co. v. Elder et al., 101 Fed. 1001 , 42 C. C. A. 130 ; Christie et al. v. Davis Coal & Coke Co. (D. C.) 95 Fed. 837 ; Gibson v. Brown (D. C.) 44 Fed. 98 . … Benedict’s Adm. (3d Ed.) § 552d; Boulton and Others v. Moore (C. C.) 14 Fed. 922 ; Lichtenfels et al. v. Phillips (D. C.) 53 Fed. 153 .

Dixon v. Gardner

302 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1969

In the same year the Social Security Administration began paying widow’s benefits under § 202(e) of the Social Security Act to Sally Brown Dixon. … Dixon traveled with Sally Brown (hereafter sometimes referred to as “second wife”) from North Carolina to South Carolina where they were ceremonially married.

Student Coalition for Peace v. Lower Merion School District Board of School Directors

633 F. Supp. 1040 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1986

At first blush it appears that Congress was attempting to expand the application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Widmar v. … Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 , 102 S.Ct. 269 , 70 L.Ed.2d 440 (1981) (forum limited to school students). A forum may be limited to topics or subject matter. Perry Education Assn. v.

North Philadelphia Community Board v. Temple University of Commonwealth System of Higher Education

330 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1971

National Mediation Board, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 96 , 425 F.2d 527 (1970); action taken in excess of agency powers, Curran v. Laird, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 280 , 420 F.2d 122 (1969); inadequacy of administrative remedies, Nemitz v. … Marable v. Alabama Mental Health Board, et al., 297 F.Supp. 291 (D. *1113 C.1969). In that ease Alabama officials were guilty of discrimination in hiring.

Arizmendi v. Lawson

914 F. Supp. 1157 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1996

See Irwin v. … The Court in Hornsby relied on Zipes and concluded that plaintiffs Title VII complaint should not have been dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1) in reliance on Brown v.

Committee on Masonic Homes of R. W. Grand Lodge v. National Labor Relations Board

414 F. Supp. 426 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 1976

EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 79, 92 [ 93 S.Ct. 827, 832, 838 , 35 L.Ed.2d 119 ] (1973); Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 [ 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 ] (1974). NLRB v. … Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Co., 415 U.S. 1 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 , is a strong precedent for denying injunctive relief.

Dennis v. Wetzel

966 F. Supp. 2d 489 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2013

Dennis testified that he boarded the 1:56 p.m. bus — right at the time the murder occurred. … He also said that Brown owned a brown Oldsmobile, and that Brown told him they had used his car. He said both Brown and Walker sounded “extremely nervous and upset.”

United States v. Serubo

502 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1980

United States v. Serubo, Crim. No. 78-71 (E.D.Pa. April 29, 1980). See United States v. Serubo, 502 F.Supp. 290 at 292 n. 2 (E.D.Pa.1980) (Lord, C. J.) (Zudick plea bargain discussion). … In United States v.

Resnick v. Manfredy

52 F. Supp. 2d 462 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1999

See: Vetrotex Certainteed Corp. v. … Co. of America v. American Guardian Life Assurance Co., 943 F.Supp. 509, 517 (E.D.Pa.1996); Mercury Foam Corp. v. L & N Sales & Marketing, 625 F.Supp. 87 (E.D.Pa.1985); Schmid Laboratories v.

Greater Delaware Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

163 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1958

See Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission, 1939, 306 U.S. 56 , 59 S.Ct. 409 , 83 L.Ed. 483 . Generally, Davis, Administrative Law, §§ 188, 189 (1951). … We have carefully examined the case of Beacon Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, D.C.E.D.Wis.1958, 162 F.Supp. 350 , and find that case not applicable to this situation.

Foerst v. Banko

662 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1984

Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … Estabrook, 680 F.2d 822, 829-834 (1st Cir.1982), cert denied, 459 U.S. 989 , 103 S.Ct. 345 , 74 L.Ed.2d 385 (1982); LaSalle National Bank v. County of Lake, 579 F.Supp. 8 (N.D.Ill.1984); see also Brown v.

Gascoe, Ltd. v. Newtown Tp., Bucks County

699 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1988

See Schad, supra, 452 U.S. at 66 , 101 S.Ct. at 2181 ; Jenkins v. Georgia, supra, 418 U.S. at 160-61 , 94 S.Ct. at 2775 ; Neiderhiser v. Borough of Berwick, 840 F.2d 213, 218 (3d Cir.1988); Brown v. … See also Brown v.

Parents United for Better Schools, Inc. v. School District of Philadelphia Board of Education

978 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1997

The State Board’s construction of state law, as manifested in these regulations, deserves deference. Cf. Chevron v. … Roberts v. Board of Directors of the School Dist., 462 Pa. 464 , 341 A.2d 475 , 480 n. 4 (1975). See also Zebra v. *206 School Dist., 449 Pa. 432 , 296 A.2d 748, 750 (1972); Spann v.

United States v. Mieczkowski

323 F. Supp. 1239 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1971

v. … But the question raised on subpoena power was with respect to the matter of the alleged prejudice of the chairman of the local board against Brown’s religion.

Remick v. Manfredy

138 F. Supp. 2d 652 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 2001

Cameli v. WNEP-16, 134 F.Supp.2d 403 (E.D.Pa.2001); Jordan v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co., 590 F.Supp. 997, 998 (E.D.Pa.1984); Schmidt v. Leader Dogs for the Blind, Inc., 544 F.Supp. 42, 47 (E.D.Pa.1982). … Accordingly, Counts V, VII and IX have been dismissed. 3 .

McErlean v. Borough of Darby

157 F. Supp. 2d 441 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2001

In Smith v. … In Matta v.