Case law

Brown v. Septa

811 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992

The court in Ridgeway Court, Inc. v. … Id. at 255-56 , 62 A. 854 ; see also Hoffman v.

Brown v. Patton

525 F. Supp. 1062 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1981

Before the court are the Commonwealth’s exceptions to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate regarding Kevin Eugene Brown’s petition for habeas corpus. … But see, Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole, 448 F.Supp. 294 (M.D.Pa.1977).

United States v. Brown

587 F. Supp. 1005 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1984

See Crooker v. United States, 325 F.2d 318, 321 (8th Cir.1963); United States v. Pomeroy, 152 F. 279, 280 (S.D.N.Y.1907). 4 . … See Camrex (Holdings) Ltd. v. Camrex Reliance Paint Co., 90 F.R.D. 313, 322 (E.D.N.Y.1981). 13 . 5 J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.-24[2] (1976). See Porter v.

United States v. Brown

690 F. Supp. 1423 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1988

I have before me defendant William Waddell Brown’s various presentencing motions attacking both the applicability and the validity of the sentencing guidelines that were promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission … As of the late Nineteenth Century, Parole Boards began to tailor punishment to the offender and not merely the crime.

Allstate Insurance v. Brown

834 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1993

Brown with a defense in that action. II. … See Generally: Germantown Insurance Co. v. Martin, 407 Pa.Super. 326 , 595 A.2d 1172 (1991). To the contrary, that cpunt sounds squarely in negligence in that it alleges that Mr. Brown owed a duty to Mr.

United States v. Brown

225 F. Supp. 414 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1964

United States v. International Building Co., 345 U.S. 502 , 73 S.Ct.. 807, 97 L.Ed. 1182 (1953) ; Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591 , 68 S.Ct. 715 ,. 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948); United States v. Ralph J. … Joseph Brown and Estate of Tillie Brown, Deceased, Joseph Brown, Administrator v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 48639 (T.C. 1954).

Brown v. United States

365 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1973

Brown enlisted in the United States Marine Corps on July 22, 1966, for a term of four years. … a board to do so.

United States v. Bensalem Township

220 F. Supp. 3d 615 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2016

In support, the United States ’cites a Southern District of New York case addressing the same issue — whether a municipality’s zoning board must be joined in an RLUIPA enforcement action. See Bikur Cholim, Inc. v. … Said differently, because the municipality had the authority to enforce and amend the zoning laws, relief was possible under *620 RLUIPA without joining the local zoning board as a defendant. Id.; cf. Hovsons v.

United States v. Brown

354 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1973

In Barker v. … I conclude Brown has not been denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. See United States v. Taylor, 469 F.2d 284 (3rd Cir. 1972); United States ex rel. Stukes v. Shovlin, 464 F.2d 1211 (3rd Cir. 1972). 1 .

Jacob v. SmithKline Beecham

824 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1993

Franchise Tax Board v. Con *555 struction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 14 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2848 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). Of course, the well pleaded complaint rule does not state that such a defense is barred. … See Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58 , 64 107 S.Ct. 1542, 1547 , 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987), distinguishing Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v.

United States v. Brown

957 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1997

Defendant Wilbert Brown pled guilty to one count of possession with the intent to distribute cocaine base crack, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). … See also United States v.

Brown v. Villanova University

378 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1974

Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 , 91 S.Ct. 1790 , 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Cameron v. Brock, 473 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1973); Richardson v. … Miller, 446 F.2d 1247 (3rd Cir. 1971); Pendrell v. Chatham College, 370 F.Supp. 494 (W.D.Pa.1974); Bellamy v. Mason’s Stores, Inc., 368 F.Supp. 1025 (E.D.Va.1973). 4.

Brown v. Boeing Co.

468 F. Supp. 2d 729 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 2007

Finally, Brown must then prove that Boeing’s proffered reason is pretext for discrimination or retaliation. Pamintuan, 192 F.3d at 385-86 ; Johnson v. … Anderson v. Consol. Rail Corp., 297 F.3d 242 , 249 (3d Cir.2002); Simpson v. Kay Jewelers, 142 F.3d 639 , 644 n. 5 (3d Cir.1998). In reduction-in-force cases, the fourth element is relaxed, Torre v.

Brown v. Knepp

412 F. Supp. 2d 446 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2005

Brown v. Centre Township Board of Supervisors, No. 04-6447, mem. op. at 4 (February 15, 2005). … Brown v. Centre Township Board of Supervisors, No. 04-6447, mem. op. (February 15, 2005).

United States v. Brown

300 F. Supp. 627 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 1969

The function of the Board is to: *631 United States v. … See United States v. Gerald Lee Brown, Criminal No. 23078, Opinion by Wood, J. May 6, 1969. . This regulation essentially states that all Selective Service forms shall become part of the Selective Service Regulations.

United States v. Brown

447 F. Supp. 2d 467 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2006

Brown v. Bellaplast Maschinenbau

104 F.R.D. 585 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1985

Brown at his place of employment on April 19, 1982. On April 18, 1984, David A. Brown, along with his wife, Annamarie Brown (“plaintiffs”), commenced this action by complaint. … Browning-Ferris Industries Chem. Serv., 100 F.R.D. 775, 778 (M.D.La.1984).

United States v. Brown

95 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2000

See United States v. Evans, 49 F.3d 109, 114-15 (3d Cir.1995); United States v. Lieberman, 971 F.2d 989, 996 (3d Cir.1992). … The Board has postponed imposition of penalty pending sentencing in this case.

United States Ex Rel. Heacock v. Myers

251 F. Supp. 773 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1966

Tinsley, 234 F.Supp. 866 (D.Colo.1964), aff’d, 337 F.2d 856 (C.A.10, 1964); Martin v. United States Board of Parole, 199 F.Supp. 542 (D.D.C. 1961). … The Parole Board need not, though it may, give him another opportunity to be heard. Since relator was not entitled to a hearing, he was not entitled to counsel. Cf. Gaskins v.

Brown v. Isthmian Steamship Corp.

79 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1948

The only case cited on the point is Havrisko v. United States, D.C., 68 F. Supp. 771 . In that case the judge “disregarded” the question now before me.