Case law

Johnson v. Mold Solutions & Inspections, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2022

Co. v. … Bd. of Internal Med. v. Von Muller, 540 F. App'x 103, 107 (3d Cir. 2013) (providing that a court “may reduce the requested hours with an across-the-board cut” (quoting Bivins v.

Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Easttown Township

72 F. Supp. 2d 512 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 1999

Board of Comm’rs of Lower *516 Merlon Township, 147 Pa.Cmwlth. 405 , 608 A.2d 585, 590 (Pa.Commw.1992); White Advertising Metro v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Susquehanna Township, 70 Pa. Cmwlth. 308, 453 A.2d 29, 35 (Pa. … Such relief is available where a board’s decision was motivated by “bias, bad faith, improper motive, racial animus, or the existence of partisan political or personal reasons,” Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v.

Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.

887 F. Supp. 2d 598 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2012

Financial Officer and Founder,” Brown as “Chief Executive Officer and President, Chairmen [sic] of the Board and Founder,” and Marotta as “Chief Operations Officer and Founder”).) … He then joined forces with Brown and Marotta as the founders, board members, and officers of the newfound Emerge in a directly competition relationship with Synthes. See Universal Grading Serv. v. eBay, Inc., No.

BROWN v. GERARD DETOX & DRUG & ALCOHOL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2024

Shorter v. United States, 12 F.4th 366, 374 (3d Cir. 2021) (quoting Perez v. Fenoglio, 792 F.3d 768, 774, 782 (7th Cir. 2015)), abrogation on other grounds recognized by Fisher v. … As Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court construes his allegations liberally. Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 244-45 (3d Cir. 2013)).

Solis v. Local 234, Transport Workers Union

855 F. Supp. 2d 329 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 2011

Donald Dennison Transportation Executive Board 9. Robert Briggs Transportation Executive Board 10. Ralph Branch Transportation Executive Board 11. Adam Willliam Transportation Executive Board 12. … Alex Gatta Maintenance Executive Board 13. Domenic Micolucci Maintenance Executive Board 14. Denise Mears Maintenance Executive Board .

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Board of Revision of Taxes

49 F. Supp. 2d 778 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1999

Trent v. Dial Medical of Florida, Inc., 33 F.3d 217, 224 (3d Cir. 1994). The two actions must be “parallel.” Ryan v. Johnson, 115 F.3d 193, 196 (3d Cir.1997). … The Board of Revision of Taxes has already denied SEPTA’s request for'a 100% exemption.

Cohen v. Ryder

258 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 1966

Brown v. Zuckert, supra. … Brown v. Zuckert, supra, See Brown v. Macy, 340 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1965).

Chickillo v. Commanding Officer, Naval Air Engineering Center

406 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1976

See Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300, 1306-1307 (2d Cir. 1974) , cert. granted, 421 U.S. 987 , 95 S.Ct. 1989 , 44 L.Ed.2d 476 (1975); Fuqua v. … The Fourth Circuit, in Clark v.

Weber v. Inacker

317 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1970

Clifford, 409 F.2d 700 , rehearing denied 412 F.2d 1137 (4th Cir. 1969); Hammond v. Lenfest, supra; Koster v. Sharp, 303 F.Supp. 837 (E.D. Pa. 1969); see Brown v. … Brown v. Clifford, 390 U. S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968). 3.

Walder v. U. S. Post Office

179 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1959

S. of America Post Office must be sustained on the authority of Lomax v. United States, D.C.Pa.1957, 155 F.Supp. 354 and Jacobsen v. United States, D.C.Pa.1958, 160 F.Supp. 491 . The law recognizes no such entity. … There is a failure to allege diversity of citizenship and that the suit meets the statutory amount as to Brown.

BROWN v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2024

Accordingly, Brown has not exhausted her administrative remedies for Counts II and V. … Compare Jones v.

McCall v. Brooks

432 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1977

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Chandler v. Roudebush, 425 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 1949 , 48 L.Ed.2d 416 (1976). … In Copeland v.

United States v. Chester County Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes

281 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1968

California v. Buzard, 382 U.S. 386 -393, 86 S.Ct. 478 , 15 L.Ed.2d 436 (1966). This statute “must be read with an eye friendly to those who dropped their affairs to answer their country’s call.” Le Maistre v. … “There is no persuasive evidence Congress meant state labels to be conclusive, * * *_>> California v.

In Re Nutrisystem, Inc. Derivative Litigation

666 F. Supp. 2d 501 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2009

Brown, Chief Marketing Officer (“CMO”) Thomas F. Connerty, and Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) Bruce Blair, and six members of its board of directors, Ian J. Berg, Robert F. Bernstock, Michael A. DiPiano, Warren V. … The two derivative actions are Esau v. Hagan, et al., No. 07-4565 and Jones v. Hagan, et al., No. 07-5193.

Toombs v. Manning

640 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1986

See Commonwealth v. Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority, 444 Pa. 345 , 281 A.2d 882 (1971); Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Authority v. Board for the As *943 sessment and Revision of Taxes, 18 Pa. … Manning and Brown.

BROWN v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANSIT CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2023

Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999). … Ass’n v. Trabosh, 812 F. Supp. 522, 524 (E.D. Pa. 1992). IV.

BROWN v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANSIT CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 2023

: Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v … V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief is hereby denied.

Council of Organizations on Philadelphia Police Accountability & Responsibility v. Rizzo

357 F. Supp. 1289 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1973

. *1292 In the third action, Alexander et al. v. … See N.A.A.C.P. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963); Smith v. Board of Education of Morrilton School District, 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966).

BROWN v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANSIT CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 2023

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Sys. v. Altisource Asset Mgmt.

Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.

428 F. Supp. 663 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1977

In my view, Brown is clearly distinguishable. … Plaintiff has cited no case in which the Brown holding has been extended beyond its own unique facts. The “holding out” theory has not been generally applied. See Slack v.