Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • United States v. Radio Corporation of America

    158 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1958

    In Black River Valley Broadcasts v. … Gas Co. v.

    Reversed by United States v. Radio Corp. of America, 358 U.S. 334 (1959)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Township of Falls

    124 F.R.D. 91 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1988

    Three accusations or issues were brought to the Board’s attention. … Scouler v. Craig, 116 F.R.D. 494, 496 (D.N.J.1987) (quoting Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 13 (E.D.Wis.1972)); Spell v. McDaniel, 591 F.Supp. 1090, 1116 (E.D.N.C.1984).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Trust Under the Will of James Wills v. Burwell

    306 F. Supp. 3d 684 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 2018

    Next, Wills Eye requested review of the ALJ's decision by the Health and Human Services Department Appeals Board ("Board") pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §§ 498.5 (1)(3), 498.82(a). Pl. Mot. at 24, ECF No. 20. … The Board affirmed the ALJ's decision. Id.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Heeter v. Honeywell International, Inc.

    195 F. Supp. 3d 753 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2016

    The Superior Court of Pennsylvania relied heavily on this consideration in Brown v. Phila. … Rought v. Tyler Mem'l Hosp., No. 06-1709, 2007 WL 2903424 , at 6 (M.D.Pa. Sept. 28, 2007) (citing Brown v. Phila.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bomanski v. US Airways Group, Inc.

    620 F. Supp. 2d 725 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2009

    Plaintiff described the aircraft as “full” and “slightly chaotic” during the boarding process. (Id. at 44:14-23). Patrick Lenahan was a ticketed passenger on board the same flight as Plaintiff. (Lenahan Dep. … See Arnett v. Aspin, 846 F.Supp. 1234, 1237 (E.D.Pa.1994). B.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dipple v. Odell

    870 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 2012

    Plaintiff Edward Dipple filed this securities action against defendants, Pep Boys and the members of the Company’s board of directors 2 (the “Board”), on March 20, 2012. … The member of Pep Boys’ Board of Directors most knowledgeable about the Proposed Transaction. (Pis.’ Mem. at 8-9.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Crescitelli v. United States

    66 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1946

    Ct. 207 , 74 L.Ed. 686 ; Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 280 U.S. 320 , 50 S.Ct. 118 , 74 L. … See also Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Campuzano-Burgos v. Midland Credit Management

    497 F. Supp. 2d 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2007

    Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450 , 453 (3d Cir.2006) (internal quotation omitted). … See Brown, 464 F.3d at 455-56; *665 Kaltenbach v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. Rothensies

    43 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1942

    This viewL1 had been sustained by the Board of Tax Appeals in Lake View Trust and Savings Bank v. Commissioner, 1932, 27 B.T.A. 290 . However, in 1937, the Bureau promulgated G.C. … In a recent opinion (Second National Bank of Nashua v. Commissioner, Dec. 29, 1941) the Board of Tax Appeals declined to follow the decision in the Stearns case. In Commissioner v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Neely v. Eshelman

    507 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1981

    Rotolo v. Boro of Charleroi, 532 F.2d 920 (3d Cir. 1976); Negrich v. Hohn, 379 F.2d 213 (3d Cir. 1967). … Where employees of the parole board engage in duties which are administrative rather than adjudicative in nature, they are entitled to qualified good faith immunity from suit for their actions. Thompson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • White v. Beal

    413 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1976

    Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 415 F.2d 247, 250 (3d Cir. 1969). … See, e.g., Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 , 95 S.Ct. 2457 , 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975); Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974); Crawford v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Guess?, Inc.

    176 F. Supp. 2d 416 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2001

    Circuit in E.E.O.C. v. … Any member of the Board, or any agent or agency designated by the Board for such purposes, may administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses, and receive evidence.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Verde v. City of Philadelphia

    862 F. Supp. 1329 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1994

    Plaintiff specifically names individual defendants David Glancey, the chairman of the Board, Enrico Foglia, the Executive Director of the Board, Eugene P. … Davey, the Administrator of the Board, William Jameison, a supervisor at the Board, and Harry Goldberg, an evaluator for the *1332 Board (the named defendants).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • COM. FOR NEW MGT. OF GUAR. BANCSHARES CORP. v. Dimeling

    772 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1991

    Ehst is also a Committee nominee for the Guaranty Board of Directors ("Board"). (2) Marjorie M. … United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, 485 U.S. 351, 354 , 108 S.Ct. 1179, 1181-82 , 99 L.Ed.2d 368 (1988) (citing Ashwander v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Horvath v. Federal Deposit Insurance

    20 F. Supp. 2d 844 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 1998

    Leuthe was permitted to remain as a member of the Board of Directors of the company and Chairman of the Company; (ii) the Board of Directors of the Bank was ordered to elect a new president to the Bank and increase and maintain … See: Board of Governors v. MCorp Financial, Inc., 502 U.S. 32, 37 , 112 S.Ct. 459, 463 , 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991); Hindes v. F.D.I.C., 137 F.3d 148, 155 (3rd Cir.1998); 12 U.S.C. § 1818 , et. seq.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Harrison

    400 F. Supp. 2d 780 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2005

    United States v. Brown, 3 F.3d 673, 676 (3d Cir.1993) (citing Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 ). III. DISCUSSION A. … In Brown , the affidavit of probable cause for the search warrant comprised the report of a nongovernmental informant. Brown, 3 F.3d at 676-77 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • INTERN. LONGSHORE. UN. 1332 v. Intern. Longshore.

    940 F. Supp. 779 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1996

    See Mid-South Towing Co. v. … See United Mine Workers of Am., District No. 2 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zimmerman v. Duggan

    81 B.R. 296 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1987

    See Neiman v. Local m, 512 F.Supp. 187 (E.D.N.Y.1981) (primary client as member of secondary client’s board of directors). … See Hamilton v. Merrill Lynch, 645 F.Supp. 60 (E.D.Pa.1986) and Nemours Foundation v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • ROBERTS v. SCOTT

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 2020

    But see Sanchez v. Brown, Civ. A. No. 20-832, 2020 WL 2615931, at *12 (N.D. Tex. … Claims Against the Board Roberts cannot state a plausible claim against the Board because the Board is not subject to suit under § 1983.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cardio-Medical Associates, Ltd v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center

    536 F. Supp. 1065 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1982

    As the Tenth Circuit stated in Brown v. … Brown, 612 F.2d at 504 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.