Case law

Long v. Kistler

524 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1981

Bam ford. 12 A dissatisfied taxpayer must file an appeal with the Board of Assessment Appeals. An adverse decision by the Board may be appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, which exercises de novo review. … The county board of assessment appeals initially assesses the real property values, albeit without regard to assessments or methods thereof employed by other counties.

Kromnick v. School Dist. of Philadelphia

555 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1983

See, e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mechlenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Caulfield v. Board of Education of City of New York, 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1980); Zaslawsky v. … See Caulfield v. Board of Education of City of New York, supra, 632 *255 F.2d at 1006-1007.

Brauner v. United States

10 F.R.D. 468 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1950

Hickman v. … Wunderly v. United States, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 356 .

McNeil v. United States

94 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1950

Libellant was not aware of the defect in the dunnage board; nor, while he was working, would visual inspection reveal the defect to him. 12. … Co. v. Borkmann, 4 Cir., 1942, 118 F. 420 ; Munson S.S. Lines v. Newman, 5 Cir., 1928, 24 F.2d 416 . Libellant may submit a decree in accordance with the conclusions here reached.

Cardio-Medical Associates, Ltd v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center

536 F. Supp. 1065 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1982

As the Tenth Circuit stated in Brown v. … Brown, 612 F.2d at 504 .

Vartan v. Nix

980 F. Supp. 138 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1997

Reich v. Beharry, 883 F.2d 239, 242 (3d Cir.1989). ’ A contract or mutually explicit understanding with a public entity may be subject to such protection. Perry v. … In Ransom v.

United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

65 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1946

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Wisconsin Labor Relations Board v. Fred Rueping Leather Co., 1938, 228 Wis. 473 , 279 N.W. 673 , 117 A.L.R. 398 ; International Ass’n of Machinists v. State ex rel.

United States v. Radio Corporation of America

158 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1958

In Black River Valley Broadcasts v. … Gas Co. v.

Curry v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

577 F. Supp. 991 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1984

Neuberg v. Bobowicz, 401 Pa. 146 , 162 A.2d 662 (1960); Brown v. Glenside Lumber & Coal Co., 429 Pa. 601 , 240 A.2d 822 (1968). … Following the incorporation of an Equal Rights Amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution in 1971, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overruled Neuberg and Brown . In Hopkins v.

Davis v. Colonial Securities Corp.

541 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 27, 1982

Rather, they rely upon the unofficial opinion of the Federal Reserve Board and a literal reading of the statutory language. Unofficial opinions of the Federal Reserve Board are not necessarily binding upon the courts. … Thomas v. Myers-Dickson Furniture Co., 479 F.2d 740, 747 (5th Cir. 1973). The court may, of course, defer to the Board’s analysis, particularly in complex matters within the Board’s expertise.

Hayes v. Cuyler

475 F. Supp. 1347 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1979

Cuyler; a prison guard, Anthony Posea; the education director of the prison, Nathan Lewis; and the Pennsylvania State Board of Barber Examiners. … Shaw v. Beto, 318 F.Supp. 1215,1217 (S.D.Tex.1970); Diehl v. Wainwright, 419 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1970). Plaintiff’s equal protection claim against the State Board of Barber Examiners must also fail.

Bomanski v. US Airways Group, Inc.

620 F. Supp. 2d 725 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2009

Plaintiff described the aircraft as “full” and “slightly chaotic” during the boarding process. (Id. at 44:14-23). Patrick Lenahan was a ticketed passenger on board the same flight as Plaintiff. (Lenahan Dep. … See Arnett v. Aspin, 846 F.Supp. 1234, 1237 (E.D.Pa.1994). B.

Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. Rothensies

43 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1942

This viewL1 had been sustained by the Board of Tax Appeals in Lake View Trust and Savings Bank v. Commissioner, 1932, 27 B.T.A. 290 . However, in 1937, the Bureau promulgated G.C. … In a recent opinion (Second National Bank of Nashua v. Commissioner, Dec. 29, 1941) the Board of Tax Appeals declined to follow the decision in the Stearns case. In Commissioner v.

United States v. Strong

608 F. Supp. 188 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1985

In United States v. Reagan, 453 F.2d 165, 172-73 (6th Cir.1971), the court stated: The opinion of the Court of Appeals in In Re Pacific Ry. … See Rio Tinto Zinc Corp., et al. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., [1978] 1 All. E.R. 434.

United States Ex Rel. Bishop v. Brierly

288 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1968

Williams v. Patterson, 389 F.2d 374 (10th Cir. 1968); United States v. Hartsell, 277 F.Supp. 993 (E.D.Tenn.1967). … See Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490 , 55 S.Ct 818 , 79 L.Ed. 1566 (1935); United States ex rel. Heacock v. Myers, 251 F.Supp. 773 (E.D.Pa.1966), aff’d 3 Cir., 367 F.2d 583 , cert. denied Heacock v.

White v. Beal

413 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1976

Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 415 F.2d 247, 250 (3d Cir. 1969). … See, e.g., Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 , 95 S.Ct. 2457 , 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975); Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974); Crawford v.

United States v. Harrison

400 F. Supp. 2d 780 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2005

United States v. Brown, 3 F.3d 673, 676 (3d Cir.1993) (citing Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 ). III. DISCUSSION A. … In Brown , the affidavit of probable cause for the search warrant comprised the report of a nongovernmental informant. Brown, 3 F.3d at 676-77 .

Delaware Valley Marine Supply Co. v. American Tobacco Co.

184 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1960

Moreover, it is unnecessary to board American vessels to sell them because companies which own them do the buying. … He sold the products of Brown and Williamson, Larus Bros., Stefano Bros., United States Tobacco and some imported German, Italian and Greek cigarettes.

Silas v. Smith

361 F. Supp. 1187 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1973

After an evidentiary hearing, the Board may award benefits to the petitioning claimant. An appeal may be taken by any party from any action of the Board on matters of law. 77 P.S. § 872. … The argument is based, in the main, on Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970). Goldberg v.

Hayes v. Ridge

946 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1996

First, in Lyon Ford, Inc. v. … In Walsh v.