Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

2.35s

  • United States v. Caramandi

    415 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1976

    This consignment was picked up the following day by Cicalese and it was received in a brown paper bag. … United States v. Press, 336 F.2d 1003 (2d Cir.1964); United States v. Laurelli, 293 F.2d 830 (3d Cir.1961); United States v. Weinberg, 226 F.2d 161 (3d Cir.1955).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Giordani v. Hoffmann

    277 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1967

    Horner v. Ferron, supra at 229 . This record does not establish that the suit constitutes “harassing and vexatious litigation brought without merit or good faith.” 4 Horner v. … Contention that employer members of the Board of Governors of the U. I. U.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rezza v. United States Department of Justice

    698 F. Supp. 586 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1988

    Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Courts have consistently held that the Brown analysis is applicable to cases involving the Rehabilitation Act. … See, e.g., McGuinness v. United States Postal Serv., 744 F.2d 1318, 1322 (7th Cir.1984); Shirey v. Devine, 670 F.2d 1188 , 1191 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1982) (dictum); Desroches v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Kirschke

    339 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1972

    v. … November 16, 1971) (Lord, III, J.) ” If defendant had presented his conscientious objector claim to his local board, we could consider whether the board had, in fact, applied an erroneous standard in considering his claim

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bors v. Johnson & Johnson

    208 F. Supp. 3d 648 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2016

    Brown v. … Daimler AG, 134 S.Ct. at 755 -56 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 927 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)). . Daimler, 134 S.Ct. at 755-56 . . Forest Laboratories, Inc. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Brownstein v. Arco Petroleum Products Co.

    604 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1985

    Brown, Franchising — A Fiduciary Relationship, 49 Tex.L.Rev. 650, 655-57 (1971). … See Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co., 470 F.Supp. 1302, 1303 (D.Minn.1979).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Long v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 141

    544 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1982

    Plaintiff predicates this argument on Milstead v. … Indeed, he recognized: “In Vaca v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Rundle

    208 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1962

    Bishop v. Maroney, 399 Pa. 208 , 159 A.2d 893 (1960). … Sleighter v. Banmiller, 392 Pa. 133 , 139 A.2d 918 (1958). Therefore, a state remedy remains available and this Court has no jurisdiction. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1952).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Owens v. City of Philadelphia

    6 F. Supp. 2d 373 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 13, 1998

    Russell directed Brown’ to find an instrument with which to cut the-body down. Brown was unable to find any such instrument. … County v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • McNeil v. United States

    94 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1950

    Libellant was not aware of the defect in the dunnage board; nor, while he was working, would visual inspection reveal the defect to him. 12. … Co. v. Borkmann, 4 Cir., 1942, 118 F. 420 ; Munson S.S. Lines v. Newman, 5 Cir., 1928, 24 F.2d 416 . Libellant may submit a decree in accordance with the conclusions here reached.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brew Ex Rel. Brew v. Mathews

    425 F. Supp. 727 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1977

    Norton v. … Id. at 398 , 66 S.Ct. at 1089 quoting Brown v. Swann, 35 U.S. (10 Pet.), 497, 503, 9 L.Ed. 508 (1836). Fourteen years later, in Mitchell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Cuyler

    475 F. Supp. 1347 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1979

    Cuyler; a prison guard, Anthony Posea; the education director of the prison, Nathan Lewis; and the Pennsylvania State Board of Barber Examiners. … Shaw v. Beto, 318 F.Supp. 1215,1217 (S.D.Tex.1970); Diehl v. Wainwright, 419 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1970). Plaintiff’s equal protection claim against the State Board of Barber Examiners must also fail.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • CHAMBERS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2020

    Feb. 22, 2016) (dismissing a university’s board of trustees as redundant because the university is also a party); Davis v. New Jersey Dep’t of Corr., 2011 WL 5526081, at *4 (D.N.J. … Aug. 27, 2008) (dismissing a township’s Board of Supervisors because the township itself is also a party).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cookingham v. United States

    87 F. Supp. 203 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1949

    The libellant, who was second cook and baker on board the Rufus W. … Boyce v. Seas Shipping Co., 2 Cir., 152 F.2d 658 ; Garcia v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Knox v. The Ninetta

    14 F. Cas. 827 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1844

    The only case cited and supposed to be de *829 cided against the jurisdiction in this direct question, is that of Swaim v. The Franklin [supra], as quoted in Thompson v. Lyle, 3 Watts & S. 160 . … See Swaim v. The Franklin [Case No. 13,660], That case was argued and decided in April, 183S. In October, 1840, that of Van Syckel v. The Thomas Ewing [Id. 16,877], was argued before the same learned judge.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Intercontinental Trading Co., Inc. v. M/V ZENIT SUN

    684 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 1988

    Van Mucking [Sic] & Co., Inc. v. M/V Star Mindanao, 630 F.Supp. 433 (E.D.Pa.1985). 6. … McNeely & Price Co. v. The Exchequer, 100 F.Supp. 343, 344 (E.D.Pa.1951). The plums were subjected to refrigeration on board the defendants’ ship; the cause of the spoiling was freeze damage. 10.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Finberg v. Sullivan

    461 F. Supp. 253 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1978

    DeMarcus, 389 U.S. 926 , 88 S.Ct. 288 , 19 L.Ed.2d 277 (1967) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Brown v. … Mitchell v. W. T. Grant, 416 U.S. 600 , 94 S.Ct. 1895 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974). 10 . In Brown v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Finberg v. Sullivan, 634 F.2d 50 (1980)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Townsend

    335 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1971

    The Appeal Board affirmed the Local Board. Thereafter, on July 24, 1970, Townsend was mailed notice to report for induction on August 19, 1970. … To paraphrase United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Reich v. Compton

    834 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 1993

    In Brock v. … Finally, the Secretary relies on Cutaiar v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Rothensies

    45 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1942

    The Marie, D.C., 49 F. 286 ; Seneca Washed Gravel Corporation v. McManigal [2 Cir.], 65 F.2d 779 ; United States v. Winn, 28 Fed. Cas. [page] 733, No. 16,740.” In Diomede et al. v. … The case of Fawcus Machine Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.