Case law

Fenstemacher v. Pennsylvania R.

296 F. 213 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1922

In this position it was supported by the board. … Moreover, as the law now stands, the board may act and proceed to the performance of its duties, notwithstanding the choice in accordance with the act of Congress or the ruling of the board. Labor Board v. Penna. R. R.

Klingler v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.

738 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1990

Poseidon Pools, Inc., 134 A.D.2d 926 , 522 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1987) (same) with Brown v. Daisy Mfg. Co., 724 F.Supp. 44, 46-48 (N.D.N.Y. 1989) (private cause of action); Hughes v. … Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 302 n. 31, 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 1717-18 n. 31, 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.

Barrett v. Covert

354 F. Supp. 446 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1973

Brown v. Fennell, 155 F.Supp. 424 (E.D.Pa.1957). See also Hamlin v. Holland, 256 F.Supp. 25 (E.D.Pa.1966). … Brown v. Fennell, supra, 427 of 155 F.Supp. Accordingly, the Court determines that the Defendant was a citizen of Pennsylvania on June 18, 1971, and the instant case must be dismissed for lack of diversity.

Csanadi v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 773

463 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1978

Goclowski v. Penn Central Transp. Co., 571 F.2d 747, 757 (3d Cir. 1977); Pawlak v. … the Executive Board of the Joint Council.

Benger Laboratories, Limited v. RK Laros Company

209 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 1962

Beyond all this, in view of the ruling in Topliff v. … This was the point upon which violation was predicated in United States v. Besser Mfg.

Justice v. Empire State Surety Co.

209 F. 105 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1913

Young v. American Bonding Co., 228 Pa. 373 , 77 Atl. 623 ; Philadelphia v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 231 Pa. 208 , 80 Atl. 62 , Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1085; Brown v. … In such case, for the reasons stated in Prairie State Bank v. United States and Fidelity Co. v.

Smith v. School District of Philadelphia

158 F. Supp. 2d 599 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2001

See generally Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Connick, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 ; see also Gratsch, 2001 WL 406440 . 2. … See generally Fales v.

Reich v. Compton

834 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 1993

In Brock v. … Finally, the Secretary relies on Cutaiar v.

Bitler v. ROBESON TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2024

Fields v. City of Philadelphia, 862 F.3d 353, 358 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Brown v. … V.

In Re Lower Merion Township Fire Department Labor Standards Litigation

972 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1997

The Board of Directors is directly responsible to the Township Board of Commissioners. Id. at ¶ 22 . C. … Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor, 471 U.S. 290, 296 , 105 S.Ct. 1953, 1959 , 85 L.Ed.2d 278 (1985); Powell v.

Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc.

322 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1971

In Seagrave Corp. v. … SEC v. R. A. Holman & Co., 377 F.2d 665 (2nd Cir. 1967); Essex Universal Corp. v. Yates, 305 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1962); Perlman v.. Feldmann, 219 F.2d 173 (2nd Cir. 1955); Insuranshares Corp. v.

Velez v. Cisneros

850 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1994

CHA’s Board of Commissioners was left with only residual authority; reconstituting the Board was at HUD’s sole discretion. A.R. at 19955. CHA’s Board of Commissioners has not met since November 5, 1991. … Brown, Tr. 5/6/93 at 132-37. CHA/HUD identified thirty-five “severely overcrowded families.” Cayford, Tr. 6/14/93 at 165-66.

Hightower v. Easton Area School District

818 F. Supp. 2d 860 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2011

Snyder v. Blue Mountain Sch. Dist., 650 F.3d 915 , 925 (3d Cir.2011) (quoting Gray v. … See Reeves v.

United States v. Townsend

335 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1971

The Appeal Board affirmed the Local Board. Thereafter, on July 24, 1970, Townsend was mailed notice to report for induction on August 19, 1970. … To paraphrase United States v.

Riethman v. Berry

113 F. Supp. 2d 765 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2000

In ECOA, Congress directed the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“the Board”) to create regulations implementing the purposes of ECOA. See Silverman v. … Similar to ECOA, "Congress has specifically designated the Federal Reserve Board and staff as the primary source for interpretation and application of truth-in-lending law.” Ford Motor Credit Company v.

Plechner v. United States

181 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1960

In August 1939 the second sentence expired, but Hammerer was detained upon request of the parole board. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, citing Zerbst v. … Tippitt v. Wood [supra] * * * The holding is on the theory that such a direction constitutes an interference by the court with the authority of the Parole Board. See also Zerbst v.

Edwards v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

523 F. Supp. 2d 462 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2007

Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 224-25 (3d Cir.2000) (quoting Thaddeus-X v. Blatter, 175 F.3d 378, 386 (6th Cir.1999) (en banc)). A prisoner’s access to the courts is a constitutional right, Bounds v. … Although the Board argues that Edwards’s underlying claims are frivolous, Edwards survived a motion to dismiss on at least one of his claims, see Order of July 6. 2006, Edwards v. PA.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen, Local 195 v. Cross Bros. Meat Packers, Inc.

362 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1973

No. 7 v. Lueder Const. Co., 346 F.Supp. 558, 562 (D.Neb.1972). A court will not allow the arbitrator to ignore the provisions embodied in an agreement. Price v. … RCA v. Association of Professional Engineering Personnel, 291 F.2d 105 , 107 (3rd Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 898 , 82 S.Ct. 174 , 7 L.Ed.2d 93 .

ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. Leavitt

631 F. Supp. 2d 584 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2007

. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … . § 1395x(v)(1)(A); 42 C.F.R. § 413.9 .

Rooney v. City of Philadelphia

623 F. Supp. 2d 644 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 2009

Clifford Brown’s deposition testimony Clifford Brown (“Mr. Brown”), Crew Chief Two at the Philadelphia Water Department (the “Water Department”), testified on June 4, 2008. Brown Dep. 5:13-17, June 4, 2008. Mr. … Brown confirmed that the area is a “trouble spot” because it has a history of flooding. Id. at 31:19-24, 32:1-11.