Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

1.48s

  • Irving-Cloud Publishing Co. v. Chilton Co.

    463 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1978

    Consequently, the decisions of the Board to cancel trademarks are not binding upon a court of equity in litigation to determine the rights of usage of trademarks. See Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. … Graham v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • AARDVARK CHILDCARE AND LEARING CENTER, INC. v. Township of Concord

    401 F. Supp. 2d 427 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2005

    In Village of Willowbrook v. … Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township, 808 F.2d 1023, 1031 (3d Cir.1987). In Rogin v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Creelman v. Carpenters Pension & Annuity Fund

    945 F. Supp. 2d 592 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2013

    Accordingly, the Court applies the deferential “arbitrary and capricious” standard of review to the Board’s denial of benefits. 6 Miller, 632 F.3d at 844-45; Abnathya v. … In Demirovic v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania R.

    5 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1945

    Brensilber v. … Toucey v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Keim v. County of Bucks

    275 F. Supp. 2d 628 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2003

    See, Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 213 (3d Cir.2001); Reich v. Beharry, 883 F.2d 239, 244 (3d Cir.1989). … Gilbert v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924, 928-929 , 117 S.Ct. 1807, 1811 , 138 L.Ed.2d 120 (1997); Bradley v. Pittsburgh Board of *634 Education, 913 F.2d 1064, 1077 (3d Cir.1990).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Strother v. Nardolillo

    583 F. Supp. 2d 645 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2008

    Hill Correctional Facility, Strother received notice that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the “Parole Board”) had ordered him to serve an additional 23 months and 20 days incarceration for his violation of … This petition was denied by the Parole Board on March 2, 2006. (Id.).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Local 1357, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.

    202 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1961

    Plaintiff, through the Retail Clerks International Association, intervened in the proceeding before the Board. … United Textile Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. Textile Workers Union of America, 258 F.2d 743 (C.A. 7, 1958), does not require a different conclusion.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Creamer v. AIM Telephones, Inc.

    159 B.R. 440 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1993

    Estate of Friedman v. Schoolman, 483 Pa. 614, 634 , 398 A.2d 615, 625 (1978) (quoting Fahringer v. Strine Estate, 420 Pa. 48, 53-55 , 216 A.2d 82, 85-86 (1966)). … See Fried v. Fisher, 328 Pa. 497, 501 , 196 A. 39, 41 (1938); Sunseri v. Sunseri, 358 Pa. 1, 6 , 55 A.2d 370 (1947).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sharp & Dohme, Inc. v. Storage Warehouse Employees Union, Local No. 18571

    24 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1938

    The Trial Court held that *703 as the Norris-LaGuardia Act was suspended by the Wagner Act to enable the orders of the Labor Board to be enforced, it was by implication suspended to enable the Board to make the orders to … The plaintiff in effect rests its cause upon the ruling of the Circuit Court of Appeals for this Circuit in Food Stores Case, Union Premier Food Stores, Inc., v. Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union, 98 F.2d 821 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jetro Cash & Carry Enterprises, Inc. v. Food Distribution Center

    569 F. Supp. 1404 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1983

    Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) and progeny. However, this argument is simply not supported by the law upon which PFFTC relies. … As Justice Brandeis observed in Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918): Every agreement concerning trade, every regulation of trade, restrains.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Underwood v. Maloney

    14 F.R.D. 222 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 7, 1953

    See Stoner v. Higginson, 316 Pa. 481 . … See Knowles v. War Damage Corp., 83 U.S.App.D.C. 388 , 171 F.2d 15 ; Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co., 7 Cir., 125 F.2d 84 ; cf. Hansberry v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kemether v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n

    15 F. Supp. 2d 740 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 1998

    Martin v. Safeguard Scientifics, Inc., No. 96-8293, 1998 WL 306528, at *4-6 (E.D.Pa. June 5, 1998) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982)); Sabo v. … Brown Univ., 101 F.3d 155, 176 (1st Cir.1996) (distinguishing purposes of Title VII and Title IX); Marshall v. Regis Educ.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. School District

    443 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1978

    See, e. g., Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 572-74 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569, 576-78 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. … E. g., Mount Healthy City Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 283 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) (by implication); Goss v. Lopez, supra, 419 U.S. at 573 , 95 S.Ct. 729 (dictum); Board of Regents v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nikiforow v. Rittenhouse

    277 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1967

    The protections outlined in the Sieracki decision have been extended to situations where the injury did not occur on board the ship, but on the deck adjacent to the ship. Gutierrez v. Waterman S.S. Corp., supra. … He was injured by an unexplained explosion while on board.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Riccobono v. Whitpain Township

    497 F. Supp. 1364 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1980

    Goosby v. … Ainsworth (former member, Board of Supervisors), Anthony J. DeVincent (member, Board of Supervisors), William Lechler (member, Board of Supervisors), Robert Krum (former member, Board of Supervisors), Marc B.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Inmates of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Corbett

    484 F. Supp. 2d 359 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2007

    Then, in Richardson v. … In McCoy v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 2006 WL 59329 , at *5 (M.D.Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jubilee v. Horn

    975 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1997

    Defendants are numerous officials and employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the “Board”). … This holding relied primarily on Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 60 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1127 , 105 S.Ct. 811 , 83 L.Ed.2d 804 (1985).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Willred Company v. Westmoreland Metal Mfg. Co.

    200 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1961

    In this connection, Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251 , 66 S. … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United States v. Two Lots of Ground

    183 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1960

    One Joe Brown purchased certain real estate 1 in Reading, Pennsylvania, from David Realty Corporation and gave that corporation a purchase money mortgage in the sum of $42,000. … The deed to Joe Brown, the mortgage to David Realty Corporation, and the assignment to the bank were all dated January 10, 1957, and were all recorded 2 January 17, 1957.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Anderson v. Bundle

    274 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1967

    Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). … He. • then recognized Anderson as a “known narcotics man” from a photograph of the relator on the police bulletin board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.